Diagnose and troubleshoot bitcoin-auth token generation and verification issues. This skill should be used when users encounter authentication failures, signature verification errors, or integration problems with the bitcoin-auth library.
Scanned 2/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Activer007/ordinary-claude-skills --skill bitcoin-auth-diagnostics --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Bitcoin Auth Diagnostics?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/activer007-bitcoin-auth-diagnostics)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
version: 1.0.0
name: bitcoin-auth-diagnostics
description: Diagnose and troubleshoot bitcoin-auth token generation and verification issues. This skill should be used when users encounter authentication failures, signature verification errors, or integration problems with the bitcoin-auth library.
location: user
---
# Bitcoin Auth Diagnostics
## Overview
This skill enables comprehensive diagnosis of bitcoin-auth authentication issues across client and server implementations. Use this skill when encountering token generation failures, signature verification errors, or integration problems with the bitcoin-auth library.
## When to Use This Skill
Use this skill when:
- Bitcoin auth token verification is failing
- Investigating "invalid signature" or "invalid token" errors
- Debugging integration with bitcoin-auth in APIs (especially Sigma Auth)
- Token generation produces unexpected results
- Time skew or timestamp-related authentication failures occur
- Body hash mismatches are suspected
- Scheme confusion between bsm and brc77 exists
## Bitcoin Auth Token Format
All bitcoin-auth tokens follow this pipe-delimited format:
```
pubkey|scheme|timestamp|requestPath|signature
```
**Components:**
- `pubkey`: Hex-encoded public key (66 characters)
- `scheme`: Either `bsm` (legacy) or `brc77` (recommended)
- `timestamp`: ISO8601 format (e.g., `2025-01-15T14:30:00.000Z`)
- `requestPath`: Full path including query parameters (e.g., `/api/endpoint?param=value`)
- `signature`: Base64-encoded signature
**Example valid token:**
```
02a1b2c3d4e5f6...|brc77|2025-01-15T14:30:00.123Z|/api/status|dGVzdHNpZ25hdHVyZQ==
```
## Diagnostic Workflow
### Step 1: Token Structure Validation
First, validate the token structure before checking cryptographic validity:
```typescript
import { parseAuthToken } from 'bitcoin-auth';
const token = "..."; // The failing token
const parsed = parseAuthToken(token);
if (!parsed) {
console.error("FAILED: Token structure is invalid");
// Check: Does token have exactly 5 pipe-delimited parts?
const parts = token.split('|');
console.log(`Token has ${parts.length} parts (expected 5)`);
console.log("Parts:", parts);
// Common issues:
// - Missing parts (incomplete token)
// - Extra pipes in requestPath or other fields
// - Invalid scheme (not 'bsm' or 'brc77')
} else {
console.log("✅ Token structure is valid");
console.log("Parsed token:", parsed);
}
```
### Step 2: Component Validation
Validate each component individually:
```typescript
const { pubkey, scheme, timestamp, requestPath, signature } = parsed;
// Validate public key
console.log("Public key length:", pubkey.length); // Should be 66 chars
console.log("Public key starts with 02/03:", pubkey.startsWith('02') || pubkey.startsWith('03'));
// Validate scheme
console.log("Scheme:", scheme); // Must be 'bsm' or 'brc77'
// Validate timestamp
const tokenTime = new Date(timestamp);
console.log("Token timestamp:", tokenTime.toISOString());
console.log("Current time:", new Date().toISOString());
console.log("Age (minutes):", (Date.now() - tokenTime.getTime()) / 60000);
// Default timePad is 5 minutes - token older than 5 minutes will fail
// Validate request path
console.log("Request path:", requestPath);
// Must match EXACTLY including query parameters and their order
// Validate signature
console.log("Signature (base64):", signature);
console.log("Signature length:", signature.length);
```
### Step 3: Signature Verification
If structure is valid, diagnose verification failures:
```typescript
import { verifyAuthToken } from 'bitcoin-auth';
import type { AuthPayload } from 'bitcoin-auth';
const authPayload: AuthPayload = {
requestPath: "/api/endpoint?param=value", // Must match token exactly
timestamp: new Date().toISOString(), // Server's current time
body: requestBody // Optional, must match if token was signed with body
};
const isValid = verifyAuthToken(
token,
authPayload,
5, // timePad in minutes (default 5)
'utf8' // bodyEncoding: 'utf8', 'hex', or 'base64'
);
if (!isValid) {
console.error("FAILED: Signature verification failed");
// Diagnose specific failures:
// 1. Request path mismatch
if (parsed.requestPath !== authPayload.requestPath) {
console.error("❌ Request path mismatch:");
console.error(" Token path:", parsed.requestPath);
console.error(" Verify path:", authPayload.requestPath);
// Common issue: Query parameter order differs
}
// 2. Timestamp issues
const tokenTimestamp = new Date(parsed.timestamp);
const targetTime = new Date(authPayload.timestamp);
targetTime.setMinutes(targetTime.getMinutes() + 5); // Add timePad
if (tokenTimestamp > targetTime) {
console.error("❌ Token timestamp too far in future");
console.error(" Token time:", tokenTimestamp.toISOString());
console.error(" Target time:", targetTime.toISOString());
}
// 3. Body hash mismatch
if (authPayload.body) {
console.log("Verifying with body present");
console.log(" Body encoding:", 'utf8'); // Check encoding matches
console.log(" Body length:", authPayload.body.length);
// Try different encodings if utf8 fails
}
// 4. Scheme-specific issues
if (parsed.scheme === 'bsm') {
console.log("Using legacy BSM signature scheme");
// BSM uses different signature format than BRC77
} else {
console.log("Using BRC77 signature scheme (recommended)");
}
}
```
### Step 4: Common Integration Issues
Check for common integration mistakes:
**Server-side (verification):**
```typescript
// ❌ WRONG: Using token's timestamp (defeats the purpose)
const authPayload = {
requestPath,
timestamp: parsedToken.timestamp, // DON'T DO THIS
body
};
// ✅ CORRECT: Use server's current time
const serverTime = new Date().toISOString();
const authPayload = {
requestPath,
timestamp: serverTime,
body
};
```
**Client-side (generation):**
```typescript
// ✅ Token generation
import { getAuthToken } from 'bitcoin-auth';
const token = getAuthToken({
privateKeyWif,
requestPath: '/api/endpoint?param=value', // Include full path with query
body: JSON.stringify(requestBody), // If POST/PUT with body
scheme: 'brc77', // Default, recommended
bodyEncoding: 'utf8' // Default
});
// Include in request headers
fetch(url + requestPath, {
method: 'POST',
headers: {
'X-Auth-Token': token,
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
},
body: JSON.stringify(requestBody)
});
```
## Common Error Patterns
### "Invalid bitcoin-auth token format"
**Cause**: Token doesn't have exactly 5 pipe-delimited parts
**Solutions:**
- Check token isn't truncated or corrupted
- Verify no extra pipes in requestPath or signature
- Ensure token is properly URL-encoded if passed in query params
### "Bitcoin signature verification failed"
**Cause**: Signature doesn't match the payload
**Solutions:**
1. Verify request path matches exactly (including query params)
2. Check timestamp isn't older than timePad (default 5 minutes)
3. Ensure body hash matches (if body present)
4. Confirm correct bodyEncoding (utf8, hex, base64)
5. Verify scheme matches (bsm vs brc77)
### "Invalid token: time skew"
**Cause**: Token timestamp too far from server time
**Solutions:**
- Increase timePad parameter (default 5 minutes)
- Check client/server clock synchronization
- Verify timestamp format is ISO8601
### "Request path mismatch"
**Cause**: Token requestPath doesn't match verification path
**Solutions:**
- Include full path with query parameters
- Ensure query parameter order is consistent
- Don't include domain/protocol in requestPath
- Match case sensitivity
### "Body hash mismatch"
**Cause**: Body used for signing doesn't match verification body
**Solutions:**
- Use exact same body string (not re-serialized JSON)
- Check bodyEncoding matches (utf8, hex, base64)
- Verify body isn't modified between signing and verification
- Ensure Content-Type header matches body encoding
## Integration with Sigma Auth
When working with Sigma Auth (auth.sigmaidentity.com), common patterns:
**Token verification endpoint:**
```typescript
// POST /api/auth/token-for-endpoint
// Body: { authToken: "...", requestBody: "..." }
// Server parses and verifies:
const parsed = parseAuthToken(authToken);
const authPayload = {
requestPath: "/api/auth/token-for-endpoint",
timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
body: requestBody
};
const isValid = verifyAuthToken(authToken, authPayload);
```
**Wallet connect flow:**
```typescript
// Uses BSM scheme for compatibility
const token = getAuthToken({
privateKeyWif,
requestPath: "/wallet/connect",
scheme: 'bsm'
});
```
## Reference Documentation
For detailed API documentation and implementation examples, see:
- `references/bitcoin-auth-api.md` - Complete API reference
- `references/common-issues.md` - Detailed troubleshooting guide
- Bitcoin Auth GitHub: https://github.com/b-open-io/bitcoin-auth
- BRC-77 Specification: https://github.com/bitcoin-sv/BRCs/blob/master/peer-to-peer/0077.md
## Environment Requirements
- Node.js/Bun runtime with `@bsv/sdk` peer dependency
- bitcoin-auth library installed: `bun add bitcoin-auth`
- For testing: Access to bitcoin-auth repository test suite
## Security Considerations
**Never log private keys or WIF strings** - Only log public keys, tokens, and diagnostic information.
When diagnosing authentication issues:
- Use test/development keys for diagnostics
- Sanitize logs before sharing (remove signatures/private data)
- Verify token expiry (timePad) is appropriate for your use case
- Use BRC77 scheme (default) for new implementations
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!