Claude Skills by sunyifeisb-art

Reviews a proposed clinical trial agreement against an institutional research playbook to identify recurring compliance and drafting gaps involving screening practices, cross-border data transfer obligations, reimbursement controls, side-letter authority issues, allocation of responsibility for protocol deviations, and governing-law considerations.

Reviews a proposed clinical trial agreement against an institutional research playbook to identify governing-law choice issues, exclusion-screening cadence gaps, fair-market-value concerns for compensation, side-letter governance bypass risks, pass-through cost-control gaps, liability-allocation issues for protocol deviations, and safety-reporting misalignment.

Reviews a Medicare enrollment application package for compliance deficiencies by checking disclosure completeness, authority of signatories, accuracy of status certifications, lease and compensation arrangements, screening of required individuals, accreditation assertions, and consistency across related application materials.

Reviews a medical director compensation arrangement against applicable healthcare fraud-and-abuse compensation rules, nonprofit excess benefit principles, and related documentation standards, identifying fair market value opinion gaps, ownership-conflict issues, referral-motivated compensation indicators in internal communications, and time-tracking deficiencies.

Reviews a pre-submission package for a novel medical device to identify issues in product classification, biocompatibility categorization, software concern classification, electromagnetic compatibility testing gaps, investigational study requirements, predicate selection, imaging-compatibility claims, drug-use instructions, and clinical study design deficiencies.

Reviews a government healthcare subpoena and supporting materials to identify potential temporal scope objections, relator indicators, audit privilege risks, retaliation exposure, successor-liability issues, parallel-state-investigation coordination needs, and spoliation concerns.

Reviews a healthcare facility license transfer agreement to identify issues involving governing law conflicts, government certification gaps, indemnification structure, certificate-of-need reporting obligations, adverse-action disclosure requirements, and force majeure risks.

Reviews a healthcare merger agreement and supporting diligence materials to identify structural, regulatory, valuation, restrictive-covenant, reimbursement, earnout, indemnity, and operational issues that may affect closing, integration, and post-closing performance.

Produces a per-document compliance gap report identifying privacy-rule deficiencies, using subsection-level citations where available, and covering common HIPAA privacy-policy topics such as marketing communications, notice of privacy practices distribution, separate confidentiality regimes for substance use disorder records, electronic-accounting obligations, business associate scope alignment, patient restriction rights, reproductive-health privacy provisions, and minimum-necessary access c...

Reviews a draft management services agreement and supporting materials to identify common healthcare regulatory and drafting risks, including corporate practice of medicine concerns, fee arrangement issues under fraud-and-abuse principles, physician self-referral issues where applicable, independence flaws in valuation support, restrictive covenant enforceability issues, fee-splitting concerns, assignment asymmetry, and liability cap adequacy.

Reviews a Stark Law compliance program, physician arrangement documents, and internal audit materials to identify exception-citation deficiencies, in-office ancillary services same-building issues, holdover-arrangement issues, and compliance-officer reporting-independence gaps.

Reviews physician compensation arrangements, lease agreements, compliance hotline logs, and fair-market-value opinions to produce an issue-identification memorandum addressing Stark Law compliance risk, exposure at risk by arrangement, voluntary-disclosure considerations, and the relationship between unresolved compliance complaints and broader litigation or notice concerns.

Gap analysis review of a draft petition package where exhibit completeness, sequential numbering integrity, and form currency are prone to being overlooked when the filing checklist is reconciled against the petition body.

Compliance gap analysis comparing employer corrective action plans against applicable immigration-related employment verification standards, where plans may contain remedial provisions that are themselves non-compliant despite their corrective purpose.

Cross-audit comparing an employee roster against employment eligibility verification records to identify compliance gaps at the individual employee level, with employee-specific documentation, timing, and reverification analysis.

Gap analysis comparing a position’s stated minimum requirements against an individual’s actual credentials, with attention to whether superficial matches on degree field and experience totals conceal qualification-defeating deficiencies in certification specificity, pre-degree experience countability, and concurrent academic-work periods.

Multi-candidate credential gap analysis for immigration compliance where agents assess the job requirements against each candidate’s credentials, separate filing-blocking deficiencies from gaps that may be documented or cured, and produce prioritized corrective actions by candidate.

Discrepancy review comparing a USCIS filing receipt against the original petition submission, focusing on field-by-field mismatches, their potential effect on case linkage and identity verification, and the appropriate correction path based on the source and materiality of each error.

BIA appellate brief challenging an asylum denial by translating record-based procedural errors and legal-standard misapplications into structured appellate arguments using the governing immigration framework and relevant appellate authority.

I-9 compliance corrective action memorandum following an internal audit, where the remediation plan must distinguish between paperwork corrections, anti-discrimination concerns requiring separate treatment, and ongoing work-authorization obligations for nonimmigrant employees.

Draft an employer compliance certification responding to an agency site visit and request for evidence in a multi-worker sponsorship matter, with separate treatment of the external submission and any privileged internal memorandum.

LCA preparation package for multiple beneficiaries where workforce composition determines dependent-employer status and the LCA attestation obligations, and where per-beneficiary data must be verified against source documents rather than assumed from prior filings.

Motion to reopen removal proceedings where the procedural basis selected (for example, exceptional circumstances, lack of notice, or changed country conditions) determines the timing rules and the evidentiary showing required.

PERM recruitment report and companion compliance memo for a labor certification filing, where the report must document each mandatory and supplemental recruitment step in the required order and format, and the memo must separately identify compliance risks in the recruitment record.

Expert opinion letter for an extraordinary-ability petition accompanied by a privileged issues memo, where the letter must rely exclusively on verifiable claims and the memo must flag every statistic or assertion that cannot be confirmed from the supporting documentation.

Draft a multi-document response package to an employment verification notice of inspection, keeping the external response, privileged internal audit materials, and remediation planning separate and handling each according to its audience and privilege posture.

Draft a response package to a USCIS request for evidence for an H-1B specialty occupation petition. Separate the public-facing response from any privileged internal memorandum, organize the response by each issue raised in the request, and keep the analysis focused on evidence, procedure, and case-specific gaps without blending audiences.

Structured deficiency matrix extracted from a structured immigration compliance audit report, where the analysis must classify each deficiency by regulatory type and severity and separately flag any potential anti-discrimination exposure for further review.

Structured eligibility matrix for multiple visa categories extracted from regulatory summaries and policy guidance, where the matrix must preserve the disjunctive or layered structure of each standard and the discrepancy report must flag inconsistencies between source documents.

Filing requirements checklist for pending immigration petitions extracted from regulatory guidance documents, where the checklist should capture both core procedural requirements and petition-specific risks arising from beneficiary facts and filing logistics.

Cross-referenced extraction from multiple foreign credential evaluations and supporting academic records, where the output should surface discrepancies between evaluators and between evaluations and the underlying records, rather than only summarizing each evaluation's conclusion.

Structured audit of a civil penalty notice where the analysis must reconstruct the penalty calculation arithmetic from the notice's components, verify each step against the underlying findings, and identify contestable errors in violation count, rate application, or adjustment factor direction.

Audit employee I-9 forms against the applicable completion, document, and consistency requirements, using roster or intake data as needed to verify timing and form-level accuracy at the individual employee level.

Issue memorandum identifying deficiencies and grounds for challenge in a government fine notice, where each contestable ground must be supported by specific analysis of penalty-rate applicability, violation categorization, and quantified financial impact.

Pre-filing H-1B qualification review where the memo must assess both the position's specialty occupation and the beneficiary's individual qualifications, including coursework specificity, credential evaluation adequacy, and immigration history continuity, using only generalized analytical categories and without relying on scenario-specific facts.

Pre-interview issue review of a consular processing packet where the analysis must assess document completeness, application consistency, inadmissibility-related concerns, and administrative processing risk factors using severity ratings.

Pre-filing issues memo for an H-1B petition package where deficiencies in the labor condition application, support letter, organizational documentation, and financial records must each be identified with an explanation of why the deficiency creates a filing risk.

H-1B request-for-evidence issue identification memo where each agency-identified concern is analyzed for its impact on petition approvability, with a response strategy and evidence recommendation for each issue organized by RFE category.

H-1B request-for-evidence issue-identification memorandum. The analysis should go beyond the stated agency concerns to review the petition record for independent factual inaccuracies, internal inconsistencies, and sequence problems in the petitioner’s own submissions, and should assess how any such issues may affect the response strategy and the underlying petition record.

Agents analyzing a reinsurance treaty counterparty redline should avoid playbook-compliance framing that collapses distinct economic issues, and should test each proposed change against internal positions and the counterparty's stated characterizations.

Agents reviewing a commercial property damage claim against policy exclusions should apply each exclusion to each claimed category, test any exception to an exclusion against the governing policy language and applicable law, and verify covered amounts after any sublimits or other policy caps are applied.

Agents producing a gap analysis memo against coverage specifications should identify shortfalls, explain the business exposure each shortfall can create, and present findings in a severity-prioritized structure without assuming any particular fact pattern.

Agents conducting a policy form compliance review against state regulatory requirements should cross-reference prior objections, verify relevant statutory or regulatory periods for the applicable jurisdiction, and summarize gaps by severity tier.

Agents reviewing an insurance product filing package against state regulatory requirements identify potential compliance gaps, verify internal calculations, and check for required disclosures, notices, timing provisions, and consistency across documents without relying on task-specific citations or scenario-specific numeric thresholds.

Agents analyzing a complex property claim against a commercial policy should compare the claimed loss categories against the operative coverage grants, exclusions, endorsements, valuation provisions, deductibles, and mitigation-related clauses; address causation doctrines where relevant; and test the claim timeline and arithmetic against the policy terms.

Agents assessing reserve adequacy against industry benchmarks should describe reserve deficiencies by comparing loss development, identifying whether access limitations affected the actuarial analysis, and tracing the external consequences that reserve strengthening can have for capital, ratings, reinsurance capacity, and compliance timing.

Agents comparing an insurance proposal against coverage specifications should analyze compounded coverage gaps across policies, check for maritime-worker coverage obligations, and calibrate severity to the practical exposure presented by each issue.

Agents comparing a reinsurance treaty against the underlying policy should treat the work as a structured gap analysis, quantify any unrecovered share for relevant loss categories where treaty limitations reduce recovery below the underlying policy treatment, and analyze how a per-occurrence cap interacts with current loss development.

Agents drafting a change-of-control application for an insurance regulator should build a complete ownership-and-control narrative, identify financing and governance items that may need disclosure or approval, and check for filing obligations in each potentially affected jurisdiction.

Agents drafting a CGL coverage opinion letter for a toxic tort claim should begin with the relevant policy terms and claim summary, then analyze the coverage issues methodically, including the duty to defend, reservation of rights, and any independent-counsel considerations.