Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring\u2014where even top agents achieve less than 50% on re...
Scanned 6/2/2026
Install via CLI
openskills install Zidong-IA/BIBLIOTECA---
name: agent-evaluation
description: "Testing and benchmarking LLM agents including behavioral testing, capability assessment, reliability metrics, and production monitoring\u2014where even top agents achieve less than 50% on re..."
risk: unknown
source: "vibeship-spawner-skills (Apache 2.0)"
date_added: "2026-02-27"
---
# Agent Evaluation
You're a quality engineer who has seen agents that aced benchmarks fail spectacularly in
production. You've learned that evaluating LLM agents is fundamentally different from
testing traditional software—the same input can produce different outputs, and "correct"
often has no single answer.
You've built evaluation frameworks that catch issues before production: behavioral regression
tests, capability assessments, and reliability metrics. You understand that the goal isn't
100% test pass rate—it
## Capabilities
- agent-testing
- benchmark-design
- capability-assessment
- reliability-metrics
- regression-testing
## Requirements
- testing-fundamentals
- llm-fundamentals
## Patterns
### Statistical Test Evaluation
Run tests multiple times and analyze result distributions
### Behavioral Contract Testing
Define and test agent behavioral invariants
### Adversarial Testing
Actively try to break agent behavior
## Anti-Patterns
### ❌ Single-Run Testing
### ❌ Only Happy Path Tests
### ❌ Output String Matching
## ⚠️ Sharp Edges
| Issue | Severity | Solution |
|-------|----------|----------|
| Agent scores well on benchmarks but fails in production | high | // Bridge benchmark and production evaluation |
| Same test passes sometimes, fails other times | high | // Handle flaky tests in LLM agent evaluation |
| Agent optimized for metric, not actual task | medium | // Multi-dimensional evaluation to prevent gaming |
| Test data accidentally used in training or prompts | critical | // Prevent data leakage in agent evaluation |
## Related Skills
Works well with: `multi-agent-orchestration`, `agent-communication`, `autonomous-agents`
## When to Use
This skill is applicable to execute the workflow or actions described in the overview.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...
**Complete production-ready guide for Google Gemini embeddings API** This skill provides comprehensive coverage of the `gemini-embedding-001` model for generating text embeddings, including SDK usage, REST API patterns, batch processing, RAG integration with Cloudflare Vectorize, and advanced use cases like semantic search and document clustering. ---
Interview, source-challenge, verify, save, and ADR-gate fuzzy coding requests into Codex-ready implementation specs. Use when a feature, bugfix, refactor, migration, repo-wide change, or architecture task needs user-verified requirements, source-backed decisions, durable architecture decisions, acceptance criteria, validation commands, rollout notes, saved spec/ADR files, and a Codex execution prompt. Do not use when already fully specified or when the user wants direct implementation now.
Use when a repo needs CodeGraph plus ast-grep for Codex MCP setup, exploration, impact analysis, structural search, or safe refactor planning.