Install vigiles and test a Claude Code harness — hooks, skills, agents, settings, CLAUDE.md — by picking the right tier (unit / deterministic / eval) and writing a test that passes. Use to check that a hook fires or blocks, that a skill triggers, that injected context lands; or to observe a run — which tools it called, whether it stayed inside its declared allowed-tools, what files and side effects it produced, how to intercept a call without executing it.
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add zernie/vigiles --skill test-harness --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Test Harness?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/zernie-test-harness)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: test-harness
allowed-tools: Read, Edit, Write, Glob, Grep, Bash
description: Install vigiles and test a Claude Code harness — hooks, skills, agents, settings, CLAUDE.md — by picking the right tier (unit / deterministic / eval) and writing a test that passes. Use to check that a hook fires or blocks, that a skill triggers, that injected context lands; or to observe a run — which tools it called, whether it stayed inside its declared allowed-tools, what files and side effects it produced, how to intercept a call without executing it.
---
Test the Claude Code **harness** — the hooks, skills, settings, and CLAUDE.md that
steer an agent — as the assembled machine it ships as. vigiles gives three tiers,
cheapest first; this skill picks the right one, writes the test, and runs it.
The guiding rule: **start at the cheapest tier that can answer the question, and
climb only when it genuinely can't.** Two of the three tiers need no model and no
API key, so they run on every commit for free — reach for the paid real-model
tier only when the question actually requires a real model.
## Step 0 — Pick the tier (the judgment call)
Match what you're testing to the cheapest tier that can answer it:
| What you're testing | Tier | Cost | API |
| -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------- | ------------------------------------------------ | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
| "Does this hook block/allow event X?" — pure hook logic, **every** event type (incl. Edit/Write, PreCompact, SessionEnd, SubagentStop) | **Unit** | free, milliseconds, no `claude` | `runHook` |
| "Is the hook actually **wired into** the assembled plugin and does it fire in a real session?" | **Deterministic** | free, no API key (real `claude` + scripted mock) | `runHarnessTest` + `scriptModel` |
| "Did the injected context (a SessionStart hook, a `/command`) actually **reach the model**?" | **Deterministic** | free, no API key | `runHarnessTest` → `trace.modelRequests` / `assertRequestContains` |
| "Does this skill's **description trigger** when it should (recall) **and stay quiet** when it shouldn't (precision)?" | **Eval** | **paid** (real model) | `measureTriggerRate` (+ `irrelevantPrompts`) → `assertTriggerRate({ min, maxFalsePositive })` |
| "Can I measure triggering on a **cheaper model** and trust it as a floor?" | **Eval** | **paid** (two runs) | `compareContainment(weak, strong)` → `formatContainment` |
| "Is this exact skill's **output any good**?" — absolute quality, no on/off baseline (the default for testing one skill) | **Eval** | **paid** (real model) | `measure({ checks: [judged(rubric)] })` → `assertRates({ min })` |
| "Does this harness change **move what the agent does**, _relative_ to off?" — A/B lift, regression, signal vs noise | **Eval** | **paid** (real model) | `runEval` (arms) + `assertSignificant` |
Most harness questions — block/allow, wired-in, context-landed — never need a
model. Only "does the model trigger / behave differently" needs the eval tier.
⚠️ **A trigger-rate of 0% on EVERY prompt is a wiring bug until proven otherwise.**
It reads like a verdict on the description, and three separate setup mistakes
produce it: a **bare** id in `fired` where the namespaced `<plugin>:<skill>` is
required; `pluginDir` where a loose `.claude/skills` needs **`skillsDir`**; and a
missing **`fixture`**, since a run starts in an empty directory and a prompt about
a file that isn't there is one the model is right to decline. Rule all three out
before reporting it. (A partial rate is a real number — don't second-guess it.)
**Don't tune against a cheaper model until you've checked it's actually a floor.**
`compareContainment(weak, strong)` answers that: it reports prompts that fired on
the weak model but NOT the strong one, and each one means the weak model is not a
lower bound but a _different router_. Prompts that fired only on the strong model
are expected and are not a failure. Measured once (21 skills, 84 prompts, haiku
vs sonnet): **3 weak-only, and one skill higher on haiku** — so containment is
not established, which is why the floor stays.
If the unit and deterministic tiers can both answer it, **prefer unit**: it's
faster and reaches events the deterministic mock can't drive.
## Step 0.4 — Observing a run, and what it costs
Two questions have their own references — open the one you need, don't guess:
- **"What did the run actually DO?"** — which tools it called, whether it stayed
inside its declared `allowed-tools`, what it wrote, how to record a call without
executing it → [`references/observing-a-run.md`](references/observing-a-run.md)
- **"Is this free, sub-priced, or does it need a container?"** — the three buckets,
and what to tell the user after a paid run →
[`references/cost-and-expectations.md`](references/cost-and-expectations.md)
Never say "we'll test it" without settling the second one first.
## Step 1 — Ensure vigiles is installed
Check whether `vigiles` is a dependency (`package.json`), and install it as a
dev dependency if not:
```bash
npm i -D vigiles # or: pnpm add -D vigiles / yarn add -D vigiles
```
The deterministic tier additionally needs the `claude` CLI on PATH (no API key):
`npm i -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code`. The eval tier needs model auth. If the
`claude` CLI is missing, you can still write and run **unit**-tier tests.
## Step 2 — Locate the harness surface to test
Find what the project actually ships, in this order:
1. `.claude/settings.json` / `.claude/settings.local.json` — inline `hooks`.
2. `.claude-plugin/plugin.json` — a plugin manifest (`hooks`, `skills`, `agents`, `mcpServers`).
3. `hooks/hooks.json` — the plugin hooks convention (e.g. obra/superpowers).
4. `skills/<name>/SKILL.md`, `agents/<name>.md`, `commands/<name>.md`.
Pick one concrete thing to pin down — a specific `PreToolUse` hook, a specific
`SessionStart` injection, a specific skill.
## Step 3 — Write the test for the chosen tier
Per-tier skeletons, and the one mistake that silently swallows failures (a
hand-rolled runner eats stderr) →
[`references/writing-tests.md`](references/writing-tests.md)
Read it before writing the file — the skeleton differs per tier, and the runner
warning has cost real debugging time.
## Step 4 — Run it
In a runner (node:test / vitest / jest) the tests are plain async functions. Or
use the zero-setup CLI, which discovers and runs the files:
```bash
npx vigiles test # *.harness.{mjs,ts} — unit + deterministic, no API key
npx vigiles eval --trials=6 # *.eval.{mjs,ts} — real model (local / nightly, not CI)
```
Unit-tier `runHook` tests need no `claude` and **always run** — write and run them
even with no `claude` installed. A tier that genuinely can't run reports a loud
`⊘ SKIPPED` (tallied separately, never a fake `✓`); a standalone script emits one
via `skip(reason)` from `vigiles`. A skip passes by default, but in a CI
job that asserts the capability is present, run **`vigiles test --no-skip`** so a
skipped tier fails — a green-with-skips is untested surface. Keep unit +
deterministic tests in CI (free); run evals locally or on a schedule with auth.
## CI — don't hand-write the steps
These tiers belong in CI, and there is a published Action for it. Run `vigiles init`: it
writes `.github/workflows/vigiles.yml`, wiring the Action (`zernie/vigiles@v1`) for the jobs
that can use it plus a plain `npx vigiles test` job for this tier — that one needs
repo-local `node_modules`, which the Action does not install, so it stays hand-rolled on
purpose.
If the repo already has a workflow, the Action's inputs are documented in
[docs/github-action.md](../../docs/github-action.md). Read them there rather than guessing:
the input list is defined in `action.yml`, and a copy of it here would be a second source of
truth that goes stale without anything noticing — which is exactly what happened to this
file's own sibling docs and to a consumer's CI comment, both measured on 2026-08-18.
## Step 5 — Lock the eval so CI stays honest (you do this automatically)
Real-model evals run on the user's subscription — locally, never in CI. So **as
part of writing an eval, you keep its result fresh for them.** Do these two things
without being asked:
1. **Give every eval a `name`.** That's what the lock keys on.
2. **After running it, commit the lock:**
```bash
vigiles eval --update # records the result → .vigiles/eval-locks/<name>.lock.json
```
Then commit that file. CI runs `vigiles eval --check` (no model) to verify it
still matches the inputs — so a later edit that forgets to re-eval fails loud
instead of shipping stale numbers.
**When you later change a skill's description or prompts, re-run `vigiles eval
--update` and commit the updated lock** — the change altered what the eval
measures. (vigiles also nudges you: when a lock exists, a `SKILL.md` edit triggers
a non-blocking reminder.)
Why it's cheap: `--check` only hashes inputs (skill text, prompts, model). A
**threshold** change in the test re-uses the saved numbers (no model); only an
**input** change needs a fresh `--update`. Full mechanics:
[`docs/harness-testing.md`](../../docs/harness-testing.md#keep-eval-results-fresh-in-ci-the-lock).
## When the user didn't say what to test
Don't ask them to specify — **pick something real and demonstrate.** Scan the
harness surface (Step 2), choose the cheapest meaningful test, write it, run it,
and show the result. Good default picks, in order:
1. A `PreToolUse` hook → **unit-test** that it blocks the thing it's meant to block (and allows a safe sibling).
2. A `SessionStart` hook that injects context → **deterministic** test that the text actually reaches the model (`assertRequestContains`).
3. A skill → **deterministic** test that it resolves via `pluginDir`, then offer the paid `measureTriggerRate` eval as a follow-up.
Then say which tier you used and why, and offer to climb a tier if the cheaper
test can't fully answer their question.
## Reference
The full guide — every tier, testing skills for real, "fired ≠ landed", the
safe-by-default sandbox, the coverage matrix, and how it compares to promptfoo —
is in [`docs/harness-testing.md`](../../docs/harness-testing.md).
Scanned 9/3/2026
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!