TAM/SAM/SOM market sizing with top-down and bottom-up estimation methods, cross-validation of assumptions, and divergence reconciliation. Generates investor-ready materials with growth projections and confidence intervals. Use when estimating addressable markets, validating opportunity size, or preparing pitch deck market slides.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add yonatangross/orchestkit --skill market-sizing --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Market Sizing?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yonatangross-market-sizing-orchestkit)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: market-sizing
compatibility: "Claude Code 2.1.251+"
description: "TAM/SAM/SOM market sizing with top-down and bottom-up estimation methods, cross-validation of assumptions, and divergence reconciliation. Generates investor-ready materials with growth projections and confidence intervals. Use when estimating addressable markets, validating opportunity size, or preparing pitch deck market slides."
version: 1.0.0
author: OrchestKit
user-invocable: false
disable-model-invocation: false
complexity: medium
persuasion-type: guidance
tags: [tam, sam, som, market-size, addressable-market, opportunity-sizing]
context: fork
agent: product-strategist
metadata:
category: document-asset-creation
allowed-tools: [Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, WebSearch]
---
# Market Sizing
TAM/SAM/SOM framework for estimating addressable market and validating opportunity size.
## Definitions
| Metric | Definition | Question It Answers |
|--------|------------|---------------------|
| **TAM** | Total Addressable Market — everyone who could possibly buy | "What's the theoretical ceiling?" |
| **SAM** | Serviceable Addressable Market — segment you can actually reach | "What can we realistically target?" |
| **SOM** | Serviceable Obtainable Market — realistic share in 3 years | "What will we actually capture?" |
```
+-------------------------------------------------------+
| TAM |
| +---------------------------------------------------+ |
| | SAM | |
| | +-----------------------------------------------+| |
| | | SOM || |
| | +-----------------------------------------------+| |
| +---------------------------------------------------+ |
+-------------------------------------------------------+
```
## When to Use Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up
| Method | Use When | Risk |
|--------|----------|------|
| **Top-Down** | Industry reports exist; investor pitch; quick estimate | Overestimates SOM |
| **Bottom-Up** | Sales capacity known; pricing validated; more credible | More work; requires assumptions |
| **Both (recommended)** | High-stakes decisions; fundraising; board decks | Cross-validate to build confidence |
Always cross-validate both methods and reconcile within 20%. If they diverge by more than that, revisit your assumptions.
## Quick Formulas
```
Top-Down
TAM = (# potential customers) × (annual value per customer)
SAM = TAM × (% your solution can address)
SOM = SAM × (realistic market share % in 3 years)
Bottom-Up
SOM = (# customers you can acquire) × (average deal size)
SAM = SOM / (your expected market share %)
TAM = SAM / (your segment as % of total market)
```
## Example: AI Code Review Tool
```markdown
## Market Sizing: AI Code Review Tool
### Top-Down
TAM
- Global developers: 28M
- Using code review tools: 60% → 16.8M
- Average annual spend: $300/developer
- TAM = $5.04B
SAM
- Enterprise only (>500 employees): 8M developers
- Willing to pay premium: 40% → 3.2M
- SAM = $960M
SOM
- Sales capacity supports ~$15M ARR (Year 3)
- Realistic market share: 2%
- Unconstrained SOM = $960M × 2% = $19.2M
- Constrained SOM = min($19.2M, $15M) = $15M
### Bottom-Up
- Target accounts Year 1: 50 enterprise deals
- Average ACV: $100K
- Year 1 ARR: $5M
- Year 3 (3× growth): $15M ARR → SOM = $15M
### Reconciled SOM: $15M (confirmed by both methods)
```
## SOM Constraint Model
Do not report an unconstrained SOM. Always apply real-world limits:
```
SOM constraints:
Sales capacity: supports $15M ARR max
Competitive pressure: 5 strong incumbents → −20% market share
Go-to-market reach: 70% of SAM reachable with current channels
Conservative SOM = min(
SAM × target_share%,
sales_capacity_ceiling,
SAM × gtm_reach% × target_share%
)
```
## Confidence Levels
| Confidence | Evidence Required |
|------------|------------------|
| HIGH | Multiple corroborating sources, data < 2 years old |
| MEDIUM | Single authoritative source, 1-2 years old |
| LOW | Extrapolated, heavy assumptions, data > 2 years old |
Always label each number with its confidence level in deliverables.
## Common Mistakes
| Mistake | Correction |
|---------|------------|
| TAM = "everyone on earth" | Define a specific, bounded customer segment |
| SOM = 10% of a billion-dollar market | Apply actual sales capacity and GTM constraints |
| Single method only | Cross-validate top-down and bottom-up |
| Old data | Use sources < 2 years old; flag if older |
| Ignoring competition | SOM must account for incumbents' share |
## References
- [TAM/SAM/SOM Rules](rules/market-tam-sam-som.md) — Calculation methods, SOM constraint model, cross-referencing
- [TAM/SAM/SOM Guide](references/tam-sam-som-guide.md) — Detailed guide with data source recommendations
## Related Skills
- `ork:competitive-analysis` — Understand competitive dynamics that constrain SOM
- `ork:business-case` — Build financial justification once opportunity is sized
- `ork:product-frameworks` — Full product strategy toolkit
---
Version: 1.0.0
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!