Business case analysis with ROI, NPV, IRR, payback period, and TCO calculations for investment decisions. Use when building financial justification, cost-benefit analysis, build-vs-buy comparisons, or sensitivity analysis.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add yonatangross/orchestkit --skill business-case --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Business Case?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yonatangross-business-case-orchestkit)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: business-case
compatibility: "Claude Code 2.1.251+"
description: "Business case analysis with ROI, NPV, IRR, payback period, and TCO calculations for investment decisions. Use when building financial justification, cost-benefit analysis, build-vs-buy comparisons, or sensitivity analysis."
version: 1.0.0
author: OrchestKit
user-invocable: false
disable-model-invocation: false
complexity: medium
persuasion-type: guidance
tags: [roi, npv, irr, tco, build-vs-buy, financial-analysis, cost-benefit]
context: fork
agent: product-strategist
metadata:
category: document-asset-creation
allowed-tools: [Read, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, WebSearch]
---
# Business Case
Financial frameworks for investment justification and decision support.
## When to Use Each Framework
| Framework | Use When |
|-----------|----------|
| **ROI** | Quick sanity check; time value of money doesn't matter much |
| **NPV** | Multi-year investments; gold standard for GO/NO-GO |
| **IRR** | Comparing projects competing for the same budget |
| **Payback Period** | Leadership asks "how fast do we break even?" |
| **TCO** | Build vs. buy; total cost including hidden/ongoing costs |
| **Sensitivity Analysis** | High uncertainty; need to stress-test assumptions |
## Decision Tree
```
Is the investment multi-year?
YES → Use NPV (+ IRR to compare alternatives)
NO → ROI is sufficient
Is this a build vs. buy decision?
YES → TCO comparison across all three options
NO → Skip TCO, use NPV/ROI
Are assumptions uncertain?
YES → Add sensitivity analysis (3 scenarios)
NO → Base case only
```
## Quick Reference Formulas
```
ROI = (Net Benefits - Total Costs) / Total Costs × 100%
NPV = Sum(Cash Flow_t / (1 + r)^t) - Initial Investment
r = discount rate (10% enterprise, 15-20% growth, 25-40% startup)
Decision: Accept if NPV > 0
IRR = discount rate where NPV = 0
Decision: Accept if IRR > hurdle rate
Payback Period = Initial Investment / Annual Cash Flow
Benchmarks: SaaS 6-12 mo, Enterprise platform 12-24 mo, Infra 24-36 mo
TCO = CAPEX + (OPEX × years) + Opportunity Cost + Hidden Costs
```
## Business Case Template
```markdown
# Business Case: [Project Name]
## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentences: what we're investing in and expected return]
## Financial Analysis
### Investment Required
| Item | One-Time | Annual |
|------|----------|--------|
| Development | $X | |
| License / SaaS | | $X |
| Implementation | $X | |
| Training | $X | |
| Maintenance | | $X |
| **Total** | **$X** | **$X** |
### Expected Benefits
| Benefit | Annual Value | Confidence |
|---------|--------------|------------|
| Time savings (X hrs × $Y/hr) | $X | High |
| Error reduction | $X | Medium |
| Revenue uplift | $X | Low |
| **Total** | **$X** | |
### Key Metrics
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| 3-Year TCO | $X |
| NPV (10% discount) | $X |
| IRR | X% |
| Payback Period | X months |
| ROI | X% |
## Sensitivity Analysis
| Scenario | Discount Rate | Year 1 Benefits | NPV |
|----------|---------------|-----------------|-----|
| Base case | 10% | $X | $X |
| Conservative | 15% | $X × 0.75 | $X |
| Optimistic | 8% | $X × 1.25 | $X |
## Risk Analysis
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|------|-------------|--------|------------|
| | | | |
## Recommendation
[GO / NO-GO] — [one-sentence rationale]
```
## TCO: Build vs. Buy vs. Partner
See [rules/business-cost-benefit.md](rules/business-cost-benefit.md) for the full 3-year TCO template and hidden cost checklist.
Key hidden costs to never omit:
| Category | Build | Buy |
|----------|-------|-----|
| Opportunity cost | Yes — team blocked from other work | No |
| Switching costs | N/A | Yes — vendor lock-in |
| Downtime risk | You own uptime | Partial SLA coverage |
| Security/compliance | Your responsibility | Shared |
## Common Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Mitigation |
|---------|------------|
| Simple ROI without time value | Always use NPV for multi-year decisions |
| Ignoring soft costs (training, change mgmt) | Add 30% buffer to implementation estimates |
| Optimistic benefit estimates | Use conservative estimates, document assumptions |
| Sunk cost included in forward analysis | Evaluate future costs/benefits only |
| No sensitivity analysis | Always test conservative + optimistic scenarios |
## References
- [ROI & Financial Metrics](rules/business-roi.md) — NPV, IRR, payback period formulas with code examples
- [Cost-Benefit & TCO](rules/business-cost-benefit.md) — Build vs. buy TCO template, hidden costs, sensitivity analysis
- [ROI Calculation Guide](references/roi-calculation-guide.md) — Detailed cost breakdown (CAPEX/OPEX/opportunity cost)
- [Build-Buy-Partner Decision](references/build-buy-partner-decision.md) — Scoring matrix across 5 dimensions
## Related Skills
- `ork:market-sizing` — Size the opportunity before building the business case
- `ork:competitive-analysis` — Assess competitive context and moat for the investment
- `ork:product-frameworks` — Full product strategy toolkit (prioritization, OKRs, personas)
---
Version: 1.0.0
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!