'Tactic: Sequential perspective evaluation with divergence aggregation.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill stress-test-perspective-rotation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Stress Test Perspective Rotation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-stress-test-perspective-rotation)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: stress-test-perspective-rotation
description: 'Tactic: Sequential perspective evaluation with divergence aggregation.
Each agent evaluates from a distinct viewpoint, then disagreements are surfaced
and resolved.'
type: tactic
strategies:
- society-of-mind
- multi-perspective-panel
dependencies:
sops:
- confidence-calibration
- debate-architect
- divergence-detection
- perspective-critic
---
# Perspective Rotation Tactic
Sequential multi-perspective evaluation followed by divergence analysis and deliberation.
## Orchestration
1. **debate-architect** assigns N perspectives (domain expert, skeptic, practitioner, theorist, etc.)
2. [Parallel] Each **perspective-critic** evaluates artifact from assigned viewpoint
3. **divergence-detection** compares all evaluations:
- Identifies consensus points (agreement across >70% of perspectives)
- Identifies divergence points (disagreement across >50% of perspectives)
4. [Deliberation] Perspective-critics respond to divergence points
5. **divergence-detection** re-evaluates — tracks convergence trend
6. **confidence-calibration** determines if further rounds needed
## Perspective Types
- Domain Expert (technical validity)
- Methodological Skeptic (rigor and reproducibility)
- Practitioner (real-world applicability)
- Theorist (conceptual coherence)
- Adversary (strongest possible objection)
- Novice (clarity and accessibility)
## Subagents Dispatched
- debate-architect (perspective assignment)
- perspective-critic × N (evaluation from viewpoint)
- divergence-detection (agreement/disagreement mapping)
- confidence-calibration (convergence assessment)
## Termination Conditions
- Convergence reached (divergence points < 2)
- Max deliberation rounds exhausted
- Saturation detected (no position changes between rounds)
- Irreconcilable disagreement identified (flagged for human review)
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
## Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
| --- | --- |
| confidence-calibration | Calibrates confidence scores based on debate progression. Determines whether to escalate, continue, or terminate based on cumulative evidence. |
| debate-architect | Designs debate structure based on artifact type — selects attack vectors, assigns perspectives, determines escalation ladder, and configures round parameters. |
| divergence-detection | Identifies agreement and disagreement patterns across multiple perspective evaluations. Maps consensus clusters and persistent divergence points. |
| perspective-critic | Evaluates artifact from a specific assigned perspective. Produces assessment grounded in that viewpoint's values, priorities, and expertise. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!