'Strategy: Military-grade assumption testing — Key Assumptions Check,
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill stress-test-assumption-challenge --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Stress Test Assumption Challenge?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-stress-test-assumption-challenge)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: stress-test-assumption-challenge
description: 'Strategy: Military-grade assumption testing — Key Assumptions Check,
Devil''s Advocacy, Team A/B analysis to expose hidden dependencies and unexamined
beliefs.'
type: strategy
tactics:
- assumption-cascade
- structured-attack-campaign
dependencies:
tactics:
- assumption-cascade
- structured-attack-campaign
sops:
- assumption-cascade-tracer
- devils-advocacy
- finding-aggregation
- key-assumptions-check
- probe-execution
---
# Assumption Challenge Strategy
Military ACT (Analytic Confidence Testing): systematically surface and attack assumptions underlying the artifact.
## Method
1. **key-assumptions-check** enumerates all assumptions (explicit and implicit)
2. Assumptions sorted by criticality and evidence strength
3. **devils-advocacy** constructs strongest counter-argument for each critical assumption
4. Team A defends assumptions, Team B attacks — structured exchange
5. **assumption-cascade-tracer** maps dependency chains from root assumptions
6. Failed assumptions trigger cascade analysis to identify downstream impacts
## Budget Table
| Parameter | S | M | L |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attack vectors | 5 | 12 | 20 |
| Probing rounds | 3 | 6 | 10 |
| Personas | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Assumption checks | 5 | 10 | 20 |
## Orchestration
```
key-assumptions-check → [enumerate and rank assumptions]
→ [for each critical assumption]:
devils-advocacy (construct counter-argument)
→ probe-execution (test assumption)
→ assumption-cascade-tracer (map dependencies)
→ finding-aggregation → attack-resilience-scoring
```
## Subagents
- key-assumptions-check (enumeration and ranking)
- devils-advocacy (counter-argument construction)
- probe-execution (assumption testing)
- assumption-cascade-tracer (dependency mapping)
- finding-aggregation (result synthesis)
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
## Available Tactics
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use |
| --- | --- |
| assumption-cascade | Tactic: Surface assumptions, sort by dependency, attack root assumptions first, then trace cascade failures through the dependency graph. |
| structured-attack-campaign | Tactic: Full attack lifecycle — threat surface enumeration, attack vector generation, systematic probing, and finding aggregation across all surfaces. |
## Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
| --- | --- |
| assumption-cascade-tracer | Build assumption dependency graphs and trace cascade failures when root assumptions are invalidated. |
| devils-advocacy | Construct the strongest possible counter-argument against a position, steelmanning the opposition before attacking. |
| finding-aggregation | Aggregate, deduplicate, and classify findings from multiple probes into a coherent vulnerability report. |
| key-assumptions-check | Military ACT: systematically enumerate all assumptions, classify by type, and evaluate evidence strength supporting each. |
| probe-execution | Execute a single attack probe against an artifact, record the result with evidence and severity classification. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!