Generates structured criticism from attack stance using Toulmin model. Produces claims, grounds, warrants, and rebuttals targeting artifact weaknesses.
Scanned 6/1/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill debate-critic --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Debate Critic?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-debate-critic)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: debate-critic
description: Generates structured criticism from attack stance using Toulmin model. Produces claims, grounds, warrants, and rebuttals targeting artifact weaknesses.
execution: subagent
prompt: ./prompt.md
input: artifact (string), escalation_level (string), attack_vectors (string)
used-by: [multiagent-debate]
---
# Debate Critic
Generates structured adversarial criticism targeting artifact weaknesses.
## Execution
Subagent — spawned via subagent-spawning/spawn-agent.
## Why Subagent
Attack generation requires dedicated adversarial stance without contamination from defensive reasoning. Isolated context ensures pure opposition.
## Input
- **artifact**: The artifact being debated (full text)
- **escalation_level**: Current level (L1-surface, L2-structural, L3-foundational)
- **attack_vectors**: Specific angles to attack (from debate-architect)
## Output
- **attacks**: List of structured attacks (claim + ground + warrant + rebuttal anticipation)
- **confidence**: How confident the critic is in each attack (0.0–1.0)
- **escalation_suggestion**: Whether to escalate, maintain, or de-escalate
## Budget
One unit = one set of attacks for one round.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!