Orchestrates pairwise consistency evaluation and narrative construction to filter the morphological field
Scanned 6/1/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill cross-consistency-filtering --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Cross Consistency Filtering?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-cross-consistency-filtering)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: cross-consistency-filtering
description: "Orchestrates pairwise consistency evaluation and narrative construction to filter the morphological field"
version: 1.0.0
category: experiment-execution
type: tactic
used-by: scenario-planning
orchestrates:
- consistency-pair-evaluation
- scenario-narrative-construction
---
# Tactic: Cross-Consistency Filtering
## Orchestration Pattern
1. **Spawn consistency evaluation** → `consistency-pair-evaluation`
- Pass: Zwicky Box (full parameter space), evaluation criteria
- Receive: CCA matrix with pairwise consistency scores
2. **Apply filtering rules**
- Mark configurations with ANY inconsistent pair as eliminated
- Mark configurations with conditionally consistent pairs as flagged
- Retain configurations with all-consistent pairs as primary scenarios
- If too few survive (< 3): relax to include conditionally consistent configs
- If too many survive (> 10): tighten criteria or select representative subset
3. **Rank surviving configurations**
- Score by: total consistency score (sum of pairwise ratings)
- Score by: diversity (maximize coverage of parameter space)
- Score by: relevance (proximity to current trajectory)
- Select top N (typically 4-8) for narrative construction
4. **Spawn narrative construction** → `scenario-narrative-construction` (per selected config)
- Pass: parameter configuration, consistency context, research approach
- Receive: rich scenario narrative
5. **Validate narratives**
- Check: Does narrative honor all parameter values in the configuration?
- Check: Is the causal logic internally consistent?
- Check: Is the scenario distinguishable from others?
- If validation fails: re-spawn with specific correction guidance
## Quality Checks
- [ ] CCA matrix is complete (all pairs evaluated)
- [ ] Filtering produces 3-8 surviving configurations
- [ ] Surviving configs span the parameter space (not clustered)
- [ ] Each narrative is internally consistent with its configuration
- [ ] Narratives are qualitatively distinct from each other
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!