Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Convergence Scoring Matrix Construction

ASecurity

Build a complete scoring matrix through criterion definition, weighting,

417 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 9/5/2026
researchgotesting

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/5/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill convergence-scoring-matrix-construction --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Convergence Scoring Matrix Construction?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Convergence Scoring Matrix Construction
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yogsoth-ai-convergence-scoring-matrix-construction/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-convergence-scoring-matrix-construction)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: convergence-scoring-matrix-construction
description: Build a complete scoring matrix through criterion definition, weighting,
  scoring, normalization, and sensitivity testing.
execution: tactic
dependencies:
  sops:
  - alternative-scoring
  - criterion-definition
  - normalization
  - scoring-synthesis
  - weight-elicitation-sop
---

# Scoring Matrix Construction

Standard MCDA workflow of define criteria → assign weights → score → aggregate → sensitivity check, producing a complete scoring matrix and ranking results.

## Stages

1. **Criterion Definition** — Extract evaluation criteria from research goals and candidates
2. **Weight Elicitation** — Compute criteria weights using specified method
3. **Alternative Scoring** — Score candidates against each criterion
4. **Normalization** — Normalize scores to make different scales comparable
5. **Sensitivity Testing** — Perturb weights to verify result robustness

## Available SOPs

- criterion-definition — Extract evaluation criteria
- weight-elicitation-sop — Compute criteria weights
- alternative-scoring — Score alternatives
- normalization — Normalize scores
- scoring-synthesis — Aggregation and sensitivity (including perturbation analysis)

## Execution Guidance

- Stages execute sequentially; each stage's output serves as input for the next
- Stage 2 method options: AHP, Swing, BWM, MACBETH, Simos
- Stage 4 normalization method must match the subsequent aggregation method (linear normalization for WSM, vector normalization for TOPSIS)
- Sensitivity testing must perturb at least 3 weight parameters by ±10%
- If any stage's output fails quality requirements, roll back and redo that stage

## Minimum Yield

Complete scoring matrix + weight vector + ranking results

<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->

## Available SOPs

Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.

| SOP | When to use |
| --- | --- |
| alternative-scoring | Score each candidate alternative against all criteria to produce a score matrix. |
| criterion-definition | Extract evaluation criteria from research goals and candidate alternatives. |
| normalization | Normalize a score matrix using a specified method to make scores comparable across criteria. |
| scoring-synthesis | Synthesize score matrix, rankings, and sensitivity analysis into a final recommendation. |
| weight-elicitation-sop | Compute criteria weights using a specified elicitation method (AHP, Swing, BWM, MACBETH, or Simos). |

<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->

Attribution

yogsoth-aiyogsoth-ai
View sourceMore from yogsoth-ai →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report co...

486982 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

805541 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end p...

486981 votes

Exa Search

Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API

304951 votes
View all in research →