Multi-Criteria Scoring Campaign — evaluate and rank candidates against
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill convergence-multi-criteria-scoring --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Convergence Multi Criteria Scoring?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-convergence-multi-criteria-scoring)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: convergence-multi-criteria-scoring
description: Multi-Criteria Scoring Campaign — evaluate and rank candidates against
multiple weighted criteria using AHP, BWM, TOPSIS, VIKOR, ELECTRE, PROMETHEE, MAUT
methods.
execution: campaign
dependencies:
strategies:
- best-option-selection
- category-sorting
- full-ranking
- non-compensatory-screening
- weight-elicitation
campaigns:
- pairwise-ranking
sops:
- context-checkpoint
- context-init
- convergence-paper-overview
- convergence-paper-research
- convergence-paper-search
- convergence-saturation-detection
- convergence-sensitivity-analysis
- convergence-web-research
- convergence-web-search
---
# Multi-Criteria Scoring
Evaluate and rank candidate alternatives using multi-criteria weighted assessment. Supports mainstream MCDA methods including AHP, BWM, TOPSIS, VIKOR, ELECTRE, PROMETHEE, and MAUT, covering the full workflow from criteria definition, weighting, scoring, to sensitivity analysis.
## Strategy Routing
| Signal | Strategy |
|--------|----------|
| "What criteria? How to score?" / select best option / rank by criteria | best-option-selection |
| "Full ranking" / full ranking / league table / priority list | full-ranking |
| "Categorize" / categorize / A/B/C grading / compliance sorting | category-sorting |
| "Eliminate non-qualifying" / go/no-go / safety screening / veto | non-compensatory-screening |
| "Determine weights" / weight negotiation / criteria importance | weight-elicitation |
## Manifest
### Strategies
| Strategy | Purpose | Budget |
|----------|---------|--------|
| best-option-selection | Select best option from candidates | M |
| full-ranking | Produce complete priority ranking | M |
| category-sorting | Classify candidates into predefined categories | M |
| non-compensatory-screening | Eliminate non-qualifying candidates | S |
| weight-elicitation | Determine criteria weights | S |
### Tactics
| Tactic | Purpose |
|--------|---------|
| scoring-matrix-construction | Define criteria → assign weights → score → aggregate → sensitivity check |
| screening-then-scoring | Non-compensatory elimination first → then fine-grained scoring of survivors |
| multi-method-triangulation | Multi-method comparison → identify method-sensitive options |
### Subagent SOPs
| SOP | Purpose |
|-----|---------|
| criterion-definition | Extract evaluation criteria from research goals and candidates |
| weight-elicitation-sop | Compute criteria weights using specified method |
| alternative-scoring | Score candidates against each criterion |
| normalization | Normalize the score matrix |
| dominance-check | Identify dominated and non-dominated alternatives |
| threshold-setting | Set minimum thresholds for each criterion |
| conjunctive-filter | Eliminate candidates failing thresholds |
| rank-comparison | Compare consistency of multiple ranking results |
| method-sensitivity-report | Analyze impact of method choice on rankings |
| scoring-synthesis | Synthesize scores, rankings, and sensitivity into final recommendation |
## Budget Table
| Metric | Target |
|--------|--------|
| Criteria count | 5-8 |
| Candidate count | 8-15 |
| Weight method comparison | >=2 methods |
| Sensitivity analysis | >=3 parameter perturbations |
## MCP Tools
| Tool | Usage |
|------|-------|
| vault_search | Retrieve existing evaluation criteria and historical scores |
| vault_query_graph | Query relationships and dependencies between alternatives |
| vault_add_edge | Record evaluation result relationships |
## Context Management
- Each SOP executes as a subagent with independent context
- Strategy layer maintains State Ledger to track progress
- Score matrix is passed between SOPs as structured data
- Sensitivity analysis results are aggregated into final synthesis
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->
## Available Strategies
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Strategy | When to use |
| --- | --- |
| best-option-selection | Select the single best candidate from a set using WSM, TOPSIS, AHP, MAUT, or VIKOR methods. |
| category-sorting | Classify candidates into predefined categories using ELECTRE-Tri, FlowSort, AHPSort, or DRSA methods. |
| full-ranking | Produce a complete ordering of all candidates using PROMETHEE I/II, ELECTRE III, or MAVT methods. |
| non-compensatory-screening | Eliminate non-qualifying candidates using conjunctive rules, dominance filtering, lexicographic ordering, or veto thresholds. |
| weight-elicitation | Determine criteria weights using AHP, Swing, BWM, MACBETH, or Simos methods. |
## Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
| --- | --- |
| context-checkpoint | Append research process and results to the current Phase's context file. Covers both process and results with genuine substance. Use this skill at plan-designated checkpoint points — typically after each strategy completes or at key decision nodes within a research Phase. |
| context-init | Create a new context file for a research Phase. Called once at Phase start to initialize the file that subsequent context-checkpoint calls will append to. Use this skill whenever a new research Phase begins and a fresh context file is needed. |
| convergence-paper-overview | Paper landscape scan at abstract level — discover MCDA, voting theory, Delphi, and optimization methodology papers. |
| convergence-paper-research | Full-text deep reading of methodology papers — complete understanding of algorithms, proofs, and implementation details. |
| convergence-paper-search | Paper AI summary reading — deeper understanding of specific methodology papers without full-text commitment. |
| convergence-saturation-detection | Determines when to stop iterating — coverage threshold met or marginal returns diminishing. Shared across all campaigns. |
| convergence-sensitivity-analysis | Tests conclusion robustness by perturbing parameters and observing rank changes. Shared across scoring, portfolio, and steel-manning campaigns. |
| convergence-web-research | Deep web research with full-page extraction — detailed methodology guides, tutorials, implementation references. |
| convergence-web-search | Quick web scan to discover relevant pages — methodology references, case studies, best practices for convergence methods. |
## Available Campaigns
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Campaign | When to use |
| --- | --- |
| pairwise-ranking | Pairwise Ranking Campaign — produce global rankings through pairwise comparisons and voting aggregation using Bradley-Terry, Elo, TrueSkill, Condorcet, Borda, Schulze methods. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!