Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Convergence Multi Criteria Scoring

ASecurity

Multi-Criteria Scoring Campaign — evaluate and rank candidates against

417 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 9/5/2026
researchgonode

Works with

mcp

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 9/5/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill convergence-multi-criteria-scoring --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Convergence Multi Criteria Scoring?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Convergence Multi Criteria Scoring
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yogsoth-ai-convergence-multi-criteria-scoring/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-convergence-multi-criteria-scoring)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: convergence-multi-criteria-scoring
description: Multi-Criteria Scoring Campaign — evaluate and rank candidates against
  multiple weighted criteria using AHP, BWM, TOPSIS, VIKOR, ELECTRE, PROMETHEE, MAUT
  methods.
execution: campaign
dependencies:
  strategies:
  - best-option-selection
  - category-sorting
  - full-ranking
  - non-compensatory-screening
  - weight-elicitation
  campaigns:
  - pairwise-ranking
  sops:
  - context-checkpoint
  - context-init
  - convergence-paper-overview
  - convergence-paper-research
  - convergence-paper-search
  - convergence-saturation-detection
  - convergence-sensitivity-analysis
  - convergence-web-research
  - convergence-web-search
---

# Multi-Criteria Scoring

Evaluate and rank candidate alternatives using multi-criteria weighted assessment. Supports mainstream MCDA methods including AHP, BWM, TOPSIS, VIKOR, ELECTRE, PROMETHEE, and MAUT, covering the full workflow from criteria definition, weighting, scoring, to sensitivity analysis.

## Strategy Routing

| Signal | Strategy |
|--------|----------|
| "What criteria? How to score?" / select best option / rank by criteria | best-option-selection |
| "Full ranking" / full ranking / league table / priority list | full-ranking |
| "Categorize" / categorize / A/B/C grading / compliance sorting | category-sorting |
| "Eliminate non-qualifying" / go/no-go / safety screening / veto | non-compensatory-screening |
| "Determine weights" / weight negotiation / criteria importance | weight-elicitation |

## Manifest

### Strategies

| Strategy | Purpose | Budget |
|----------|---------|--------|
| best-option-selection | Select best option from candidates | M |
| full-ranking | Produce complete priority ranking | M |
| category-sorting | Classify candidates into predefined categories | M |
| non-compensatory-screening | Eliminate non-qualifying candidates | S |
| weight-elicitation | Determine criteria weights | S |

### Tactics

| Tactic | Purpose |
|--------|---------|
| scoring-matrix-construction | Define criteria → assign weights → score → aggregate → sensitivity check |
| screening-then-scoring | Non-compensatory elimination first → then fine-grained scoring of survivors |
| multi-method-triangulation | Multi-method comparison → identify method-sensitive options |

### Subagent SOPs

| SOP | Purpose |
|-----|---------|
| criterion-definition | Extract evaluation criteria from research goals and candidates |
| weight-elicitation-sop | Compute criteria weights using specified method |
| alternative-scoring | Score candidates against each criterion |
| normalization | Normalize the score matrix |
| dominance-check | Identify dominated and non-dominated alternatives |
| threshold-setting | Set minimum thresholds for each criterion |
| conjunctive-filter | Eliminate candidates failing thresholds |
| rank-comparison | Compare consistency of multiple ranking results |
| method-sensitivity-report | Analyze impact of method choice on rankings |
| scoring-synthesis | Synthesize scores, rankings, and sensitivity into final recommendation |

## Budget Table

| Metric | Target |
|--------|--------|
| Criteria count | 5-8 |
| Candidate count | 8-15 |
| Weight method comparison | >=2 methods |
| Sensitivity analysis | >=3 parameter perturbations |

## MCP Tools

| Tool | Usage |
|------|-------|
| vault_search | Retrieve existing evaluation criteria and historical scores |
| vault_query_graph | Query relationships and dependencies between alternatives |
| vault_add_edge | Record evaluation result relationships |

## Context Management

- Each SOP executes as a subagent with independent context
- Strategy layer maintains State Ledger to track progress
- Score matrix is passed between SOPs as structured data
- Sensitivity analysis results are aggregated into final synthesis

<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->

## Available Strategies

Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.

| Strategy | When to use |
| --- | --- |
| best-option-selection | Select the single best candidate from a set using WSM, TOPSIS, AHP, MAUT, or VIKOR methods. |
| category-sorting | Classify candidates into predefined categories using ELECTRE-Tri, FlowSort, AHPSort, or DRSA methods. |
| full-ranking | Produce a complete ordering of all candidates using PROMETHEE I/II, ELECTRE III, or MAVT methods. |
| non-compensatory-screening | Eliminate non-qualifying candidates using conjunctive rules, dominance filtering, lexicographic ordering, or veto thresholds. |
| weight-elicitation | Determine criteria weights using AHP, Swing, BWM, MACBETH, or Simos methods. |

## Available SOPs

Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.

| SOP | When to use |
| --- | --- |
| context-checkpoint | Append research process and results to the current Phase's context file. Covers both process and results with genuine substance. Use this skill at plan-designated checkpoint points — typically after each strategy completes or at key decision nodes within a research Phase. |
| context-init | Create a new context file for a research Phase. Called once at Phase start to initialize the file that subsequent context-checkpoint calls will append to. Use this skill whenever a new research Phase begins and a fresh context file is needed. |
| convergence-paper-overview | Paper landscape scan at abstract level — discover MCDA, voting theory, Delphi, and optimization methodology papers. |
| convergence-paper-research | Full-text deep reading of methodology papers — complete understanding of algorithms, proofs, and implementation details. |
| convergence-paper-search | Paper AI summary reading — deeper understanding of specific methodology papers without full-text commitment. |
| convergence-saturation-detection | Determines when to stop iterating — coverage threshold met or marginal returns diminishing. Shared across all campaigns. |
| convergence-sensitivity-analysis | Tests conclusion robustness by perturbing parameters and observing rank changes. Shared across scoring, portfolio, and steel-manning campaigns. |
| convergence-web-research | Deep web research with full-page extraction — detailed methodology guides, tutorials, implementation references. |
| convergence-web-search | Quick web scan to discover relevant pages — methodology references, case studies, best practices for convergence methods. |

## Available Campaigns

Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.

| Campaign | When to use |
| --- | --- |
| pairwise-ranking | Pairwise Ranking Campaign — produce global rankings through pairwise comparisons and voting aggregation using Bradley-Terry, Elo, TrueSkill, Condorcet, Borda, Schulze methods. |

<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->

Attribution

yogsoth-aiyogsoth-ai
View sourceMore from yogsoth-ai →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Know which skills are safe — weekly.

Best new skills + every skill we flagged as malicious. From the team that scanned 103,619.

Join free

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 8 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, three-way literature scan, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report co...

486982 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

805541 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory, coverage-bounded integrity checks, two-stage peer review, and auditable quality-assurance artifacts. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end p...

486981 votes

Exa Search

Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API

304951 votes
View all in research →