Skills DirectorySkills Directory
SkillsLearnSecurityCategoriesDocsCommunityBlog
Sign InSubmit Skill
Skills Directory

Security-tested agent skills for Claude, coding agents, and AI workflows.

Directory

  • Browse Skills
  • All Skills A–Z
  • Claude Skills
  • Claude Code Skills
  • Agent Skills
  • Categories
  • Submit a Skill

Learn

  • Learn Hub
  • Install Claude Skills
  • Write SKILL.md
  • Skills vs MCP
  • Directories Compared

Security

  • Security
  • Methodology
  • Secure Claude Skills
  • Security Badges

Company

  • About
  • Community
  • Blog
  • API Docs
  • Advertise

2026 Skills Directory. All rights reserved.

Back to skills

Constraint Identification

ASecurity

Find blockers and showstoppers using TOC, TRIZ contradiction analysis, and Pre-mortem techniques.

417 stars
0 votes
0 copies
1 views
Added 6/2/2026
researchgo

Security Analysis

A100/100

Scanned 6/2/2026

Install to Claude Code

$npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill constraint-identification --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Constraint Identification?

Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Constraint Identification
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/yogsoth-ai-constraint-identification/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-constraint-identification)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.

Download Zip
Files
SKILL.md
---
name: constraint-identification
description: Find blockers and showstoppers using TOC, TRIZ contradiction analysis, and Pre-mortem techniques.
used-by: feasibility-assessment
---

# Constraint Identification

**Purpose:** Systematically discover what could prevent a candidate from being implemented. Uses Theory of Constraints to find bottlenecks, TRIZ to surface contradictions, and Pre-mortem to anticipate failures before they occur.

**When to use:**
- A candidate looks promising but you need to stress-test its viability
- Stakeholders want to know what could go wrong before committing
- You need a structured inventory of blockers with severity and removability assessments

## Budget

| Metric | Target |
|--------|--------|
| Constraints identified | >= 3 per candidate |
| Hard constraints classified | >= 1 |
| Removal paths designed | >= 1 per removable constraint |

## State Ledger

| Key | Type | Description |
|-----|------|-------------|
| candidate | object | The candidate under assessment |
| constraints[] | array | All identified constraints |
| hard_constraints[] | array | Non-negotiable blockers |
| soft_constraints[] | array | Constraints that can be worked around |
| assumptions[] | array | Unvalidated beliefs that may become constraints |
| removal_paths{} | map | Constraint -> removal path mapping |

## Available Tactics

| Tactic | When |
|--------|------|
| constraint-drilling | Default — full constraint discovery, classification, and removal path design |

## Available SOPs

| SOP | Purpose |
|-----|---------|
| constraint-identification-sop | Discover constraints |
| constraint-classification | Sort into hard/soft/assumptions |
| removability-assessment | Score how removable each constraint is |
| removal-path | Design steps to remove a constraint |

## Execution Guidance

1. Deploy `constraint-identification-sop` to discover all constraints using TOC, TRIZ, and Pre-mortem
2. Feed discovered constraints to `constraint-classification` to sort them
3. For each non-trivial constraint, run `removability-assessment`
4. For constraints with removability score > 0.3, design `removal-path`
5. Aggregate findings into state ledger

## Output Format

```yaml
constraint_analysis:
  candidate: <name>
  total_constraints: N
  hard_constraints:
    - {constraint, severity, rationale}
  soft_constraints:
    - {constraint, severity, workaround_sketch}
  assumptions:
    - {assumption, risk_if_false, validation_method}
  removal_paths:
    - {constraint, removability: 0.X, steps: [...], timeline, resources}
  showstopper_verdict: <yes/no>
  showstopper_reason: <if yes>
```

Attribution

yogsoth-aiyogsoth-ai
View sourceMore from yogsoth-ai →
SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

SSkills DirectorySkills Directory

Your tool, in front of Claude Code builders.

3 founder slots · $299/mo · GSC-verified traffic · sponsors can never buy grades.

See placements

Related Skills

Competitor Analysis

This skill provides comprehensive analysis of competitor SEO and GEO strategies, revealing what's working in your market and identifying opportunities to outperform the competition.

1823 votes

Deep Research

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review...

452202 votes

Paperclip Distill

Use when an operation issue is a Paperclip cursor-window, distill, or backfill — `operationType: "distill"` or `"backfill"` and the body references a Paperclip source bundle for a project or root issue. Turn raw Paperclip activity into a wiki-insightful project page, decisions log, and history note. This skill exists specifically to replace the stiff, datestamp-heavy templated output that the deterministic distiller produces.

805541 votes

Academic Pipeline

Orchestrator for the full academic research pipeline: research -> write -> integrity check -> review -> revise -> re-review -> re-revise -> final integrity check -> finalize. Coordinates deep-research, academic-paper, and academic-paper-reviewer into a seamless 10-stage workflow with mandatory integrity verification, two-stage peer review, and reproducible quality gates. Triggers on: academic pipeline, research to paper, full paper workflow, paper pipeline, end-to-end paper, research-to-publi...

452201 votes

Exa Search

Semantic search, similar content discovery, and structured research using Exa API

304951 votes
View all in research →