Find blockers and showstoppers using TOC, TRIZ contradiction analysis, and Pre-mortem techniques.
Scanned 6/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine --skill constraint-identification --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Constraint Identification?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/yogsoth-ai-constraint-identification)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: constraint-identification
description: Find blockers and showstoppers using TOC, TRIZ contradiction analysis, and Pre-mortem techniques.
used-by: feasibility-assessment
---
# Constraint Identification
**Purpose:** Systematically discover what could prevent a candidate from being implemented. Uses Theory of Constraints to find bottlenecks, TRIZ to surface contradictions, and Pre-mortem to anticipate failures before they occur.
**When to use:**
- A candidate looks promising but you need to stress-test its viability
- Stakeholders want to know what could go wrong before committing
- You need a structured inventory of blockers with severity and removability assessments
## Budget
| Metric | Target |
|--------|--------|
| Constraints identified | >= 3 per candidate |
| Hard constraints classified | >= 1 |
| Removal paths designed | >= 1 per removable constraint |
## State Ledger
| Key | Type | Description |
|-----|------|-------------|
| candidate | object | The candidate under assessment |
| constraints[] | array | All identified constraints |
| hard_constraints[] | array | Non-negotiable blockers |
| soft_constraints[] | array | Constraints that can be worked around |
| assumptions[] | array | Unvalidated beliefs that may become constraints |
| removal_paths{} | map | Constraint -> removal path mapping |
## Available Tactics
| Tactic | When |
|--------|------|
| constraint-drilling | Default — full constraint discovery, classification, and removal path design |
## Available SOPs
| SOP | Purpose |
|-----|---------|
| constraint-identification-sop | Discover constraints |
| constraint-classification | Sort into hard/soft/assumptions |
| removability-assessment | Score how removable each constraint is |
| removal-path | Design steps to remove a constraint |
## Execution Guidance
1. Deploy `constraint-identification-sop` to discover all constraints using TOC, TRIZ, and Pre-mortem
2. Feed discovered constraints to `constraint-classification` to sort them
3. For each non-trivial constraint, run `removability-assessment`
4. For constraints with removability score > 0.3, design `removal-path`
5. Aggregate findings into state ledger
## Output Format
```yaml
constraint_analysis:
candidate: <name>
total_constraints: N
hard_constraints:
- {constraint, severity, rationale}
soft_constraints:
- {constraint, severity, workaround_sketch}
assumptions:
- {assumption, risk_if_false, validation_method}
removal_paths:
- {constraint, removability: 0.X, steps: [...], timeline, resources}
showstopper_verdict: <yes/no>
showstopper_reason: <if yes>
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!