Skip to content
Back to skills

Deep Interview

ASecurity

Ambiguity gating — detects vague feature requests and forces structured requirements gathering with scoring across scope, platform, performance, integration, and acceptance criteria. Prevents wasted cycles on underspecified tasks.

  • 21 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 3 views
  • Added May 27, 2026
data-aiperformance

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned May 27, 2026

npx -y skills add XeldarAlz/everything-claude-unity --skill deep-interview --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Deep Interview?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Deep Interview
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/xeldaralz-deep-interview/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/xeldaralz-deep-interview)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: deep-interview
description: "Ambiguity gating — detects vague feature requests and forces structured requirements gathering with scoring across scope, platform, performance, integration, and acceptance criteria. Prevents wasted cycles on underspecified tasks."
alwaysApply: true
---

# Deep Interview — Ambiguity Gating

Before executing any feature request, evaluate whether the requirements are clear enough to proceed. Vague requests waste agent cycles and produce code that needs reworking.

## When to Activate

A request is **vague** when ALL of these are true:
- No file paths or directory references mentioned
- No function, class, or component names specified
- No code blocks or snippets included
- No numbered steps or explicit instructions
- The request is more than 10 words (short requests like "add a jump" are intentionally open-ended and acceptable)

If **any one** specificity signal is present, skip the interview and proceed normally.

## Exemptions — Skip the Interview

Do NOT activate for:
- **Bug fixes** — request mentions "error", "bug", "crash", "fix", "broken", "NullReference", "exception"
- **Commands with built-in clarification** — `/unity-workflow` has its own Phase 1: Clarify, `/unity-prototype` expects open-ended prompts
- **Explicit opt-out** — user includes `--skip-interview` or says "just do it" / "don't ask"
- **Follow-up requests** — user is continuing a conversation where requirements were already established
- **Simple modifications** — "make it faster", "change the color to red", "increase the speed"

## Ambiguity Score

Rate the request across 5 dimensions. Each scores 0–2:

| Score | Meaning |
|-------|---------|
| 0 | Unspecified — no information provided |
| 1 | Partial — vague or implied |
| 2 | Clear — explicitly stated or obvious from context |

### Dimensions

1. **Scope** — What exactly is being built? What are its boundaries? What is NOT included?
2. **Platform** — Target platform, Unity version, render pipeline, input method?
3. **Performance** — FPS target, memory budget, draw call limits, target device tier?
4. **Integration** — What existing systems does this touch? Dependencies? Data flow?
5. **Acceptance Criteria** — How do we know it's done? What should we test? What does success look like?

**Threshold: total score >= 6 out of 10 to proceed.**

## Interview Protocol

When the score is below threshold:

1. **Present the current scores** — show the user which dimensions are weak
2. **Ask targeted questions** — max 3 questions per round, focused on the lowest-scoring dimensions
3. **Re-score after each round** — update scores based on answers
4. **Proceed when threshold is met** — or when the user explicitly opts out

Question style: be direct and specific, not generic. Instead of "What platform?", ask "Is this for mobile (touch input, limited GPU) or desktop (keyboard/mouse, full GPU budget)?"

## Output: Requirements Document

When the threshold is met, produce a structured summary:

```
## Requirements Summary

**Feature:** [one-line description]

**Scope:** [what's included and what's explicitly excluded]
**Platform:** [target platform, input method, render pipeline]
**Performance:** [constraints, budgets, target devices]
**Integration:** [systems touched, dependencies, data flow]
**Acceptance Criteria:**
- [criterion 1]
- [criterion 2]
- [criterion 3]
```

Ask the user to confirm the summary before proceeding to implementation.

## Scoring Examples

**Vague (score 3/10):** "Add multiplayer to my game"
- Scope: 1 (multiplayer is broad — co-op? competitive? matchmaking?)
- Platform: 0 (unspecified)
- Performance: 0 (unspecified)
- Integration: 1 (implies networking but no specifics)
- Acceptance: 1 (implied: "it works")

**Clear enough (score 7/10):** "Add 2-player local co-op split-screen for the existing PlayerController using the new Input System"
- Scope: 2 (2-player local co-op split-screen)
- Platform: 1 (implies desktop from split-screen, but not explicit)
- Performance: 1 (split-screen implies rendering budget concern)
- Integration: 2 (PlayerController, Input System explicitly named)
- Acceptance: 1 (implied: both players can play simultaneously)

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.