Clio contacts -- the people and companies connected to matters: person vs. company contact types, and how a contact relates to the matters they are party to (client, opposing party, witness, and other roles).
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add WYRE-AI/msp-claude-plugins --skill contacts --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Contacts?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/wyre-ai-contacts)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: "Clio Contacts"
description: >
Clio contacts -- the people and companies connected to matters: person
vs. company contact types, and how a contact relates to the matters they
are party to (client, opposing party, witness, and other roles).
when_to_use: >-
When creating, updating, or searching for a Clio contact, or when
figuring out how a contact relates to a matter. Use when: clio contact,
clio person, clio company, clio client contact, clio opposing counsel,
clio witness, or clio contact search.
---
# Clio Contacts
## Overview
A **contact** in Clio is a person or a company. Contacts exist
independently of any single matter — the same contact can be the client on
one matter, opposing counsel on another, and a witness on a third. Tools:
`clio_contacts_list`, `clio_contacts_get`, `clio_contacts_create`,
`clio_contacts_update`. Navigate into the `contacts` domain first.
**No delete tool exists for contacts** — same rule as everywhere else in
this integration (see [api-patterns](../api-patterns/SKILL.md)). A contact
that's no longer relevant doesn't get removed through this integration.
## Anti-triggers
- **An MSP client, its billing entity, or a service-desk contact** — every
other plugin here says "contact", "client", and "company" too, and none
of them mean a party to a legal matter. Use `autotask-crm`,
`connectwise-psa-contacts`, `halopsa-clients`, `hubspot-contacts`, or
`qbo-customers`.
- **Everyone connected to a case** — a contact is a party record, not the
case file. The relationship (client, opposing party, witness) is carried
on the matter; use `clio-matters` to resolve the matter first.
- **Removing someone's data on request** — no delete tool exists here, and
legal retention obligations are exactly why. That request goes to the
firm, in Clio, with a human deciding.
## People vs. Company Contacts
Clio contacts come in two shapes:
| Type | Examples | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| **Person** | An individual client, an opposing party who is a person, a witness, an individual attorney at another firm | Has first/last name fields |
| **Company** | A corporate client, an opposing party that's a business entity, a vendor | Has a company/organization name; may have associated people (e.g. a primary contact at the company) |
When creating a contact, get the type right up front — person vs. company
determines which fields are meaningful (a company doesn't have a
first/last name; a person isn't "incorporated"). If a user describes an
entity ambiguously ("Acme" could be a company or could be shorthand for a
person at Acme), ask rather than guess, especially before creating a new
contact — search first (see below).
## Contact ↔ Matter Relationships
A contact's relationship to a given matter is contextual, not a fixed
property of the contact itself. The same contact record might be:
- **Client** — the party the firm represents on the matter (every matter
has exactly one client contact — see the
[matters skill](../matters/SKILL.md))
- **Opposing party** — the other side in the matter
- **Witness** — someone with relevant testimony or evidence, not a party
- Other matter-specific roles the firm tracks (co-counsel, expert,
guardian ad litem, etc.), depending on how the firm uses Clio
Don't assume a contact's role from one matter carries over to another —
the same person can be a client on one file and a witness on an unrelated
file. When summarizing "who's involved" in a matter, resolve the
relationship per-matter rather than trusting a contact's role from a
different context.
## Searching Before Creating
Law firms accumulate large contact lists with overlapping names (multiple
"John Smith"s across different matters is normal, not a data quality
problem). Before calling `clio_contacts_create`:
1. Search existing contacts (`clio_contacts_list` with a name/company
filter) — check email address and company affiliation, not just name,
to disambiguate.
2. If there's a plausible existing match, confirm with the user rather
than silently reusing it or silently creating a duplicate — both are
real failure modes in a system where contacts persist across many
matters and years.
3. Only create a new contact once you're confident it doesn't already
exist.
## Creating and Updating Contacts
- **Person**: first name, last name are the minimum meaningful fields;
email/phone are commonly expected for anyone who'll be communicated
with directly.
- **Company**: the organization name is the minimum; consider whether the
firm also wants a primary person contact linked at the company for
day-to-day communication.
- **Updates** (`clio_contacts_update`) are scoped to a single contact ID —
send only the fields actually changing.
Contact data is comparatively low-sensitivity relative to matter content
(communications, documents), but it's still client PII — don't populate
fields with guesses, and don't merge/overwrite existing contact data
without the user's explicit intent.
## Related Skills
- [Clio API Patterns](../api-patterns/SKILL.md) — connection, navigation, scope limits
- [Clio Matters](../matters/SKILL.md) — the matter a contact is linked to, and the client relationship
- [Clio Time & Billing](../time-billing/SKILL.md) — activities and bills, which reference the matter, not the contact directly
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!