Sender allow/block rules at all five scopes: downward inheritance (reseller rules apply to everything beneath), the listing that returns only directly-attached rules, create with `rule_type: allow|block` and address-or-domain values, and the flat delete endpoint.
Scanned 9/5/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add WYRE-AI/msp-claude-plugins --skill allow-block-rules --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Allow Block Rules?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/wyre-ai-allow-block-rules)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: "Mailprotector Allow/Block Rules"
description: >
Sender allow/block rules at all five scopes: downward inheritance
(reseller rules apply to everything beneath), the listing that returns
only directly-attached rules, create with `rule_type: allow|block` and
address-or-domain values, and the flat delete endpoint.
when_to_use: >-
When managing Mailprotector sender rules. Use when: allow rule, block
rule, allowlist, blocklist, whitelist, blacklist, block sender,
mailprotector rule_type, allow_block_rules, sender exception.
---
# Mailprotector Allow/Block Rules
## Overview
Allow/block rules override filtering per sender: an allow rule bypasses
spam scoring for that sender; a block rule stops the sender's mail
outright. Rules attach to any level of the hierarchy and inherit
downward, so scope choice is the whole game.
## Key Concepts
| Concept | Detail |
|---------|--------|
| `rule_type` | Send lowercase `allow` or `block`; responses may echo `"Allow"`/`"Block"` capitalized — compare case-insensitively |
| `value` | A full address (`user@domain.com`) or a bare domain (`domain.com`) — nothing else, no wildcards |
| `entity` | The owner in responses: `{id, entity_type, name}` with `entity_type` `Account` (reseller **or** customer), `Domain`, `UserGroup`, or `User` |
| Inheritance | A rule applies to the entity it's attached to and everything beneath it |
## Common Workflows
### Listing rules at a scope
`mailprotector_allow_block_rules_list` with `scope` + `scope_id` →
`GET /{resellers|customers|domains|user_groups|users}/{id}/allow_block_rules`.
**The listing returns only rules attached directly to that entity** —
neither rules on entities beneath it nor rules inherited from above.
The effective rule set for a user is the union of five listings:
reseller → customer → domain → user group → user. Audit the whole chain
before declaring "no rule exists for this sender".
### Creating a rule
`mailprotector_allow_block_rules_create` with `scope`, `scope_id`, and
```json
{"value": "user@domain.com", "rule_type": "block"}
```
→ `POST /{scope}/{scope_id}/allow_block_rules`, 201 with the rule `id`.
Pick the narrowest scope that solves the problem:
- One user's newsletter complaint → user scope.
- A customer-wide vendor false positive → customer scope.
- A reseller-scope rule applies to **every customer, domain, group, and
user** under the MSP — reserve it for universally-true decisions
(e.g. blocking a known-abusive domain fleet-wide), and say the blast
radius out loud before creating one.
### Deleting a rule
`mailprotector_allow_block_rules_delete` →
`DELETE /allow_block_rules/{allow_block_rule_id}` → 204. The endpoint is
flat (no scope in the path) — the `id` from a listing is all you need,
which also means a listing at any scope hands you enough to delete rules
you can see. Deletes are irreversible; re-creating needs the original
`value`/`rule_type`, so record them before deleting.
## Gotchas
- **Allow rules are a durable filtering hole.** Spam scoring is bypassed
for the matched sender, and spoofed mail claiming that sender inherits
the exemption. Prefer address values over whole domains, and prefer
narrow scopes over wide ones.
- **A domain value matches every address at that domain** — allowing
`gmail.com` at any scope is allowing all of Gmail.
- **Block rules fail silent.** The sender's mail simply stops arriving —
no bounce the recipient sees. A block on a shared sending service
(e.g. a marketing platform's domain) takes out every legitimate
customer of that service under the rule's scope.
- **`entity_type: "Account"` is ambiguous** between reseller and
customer in responses — resolve by the `entity.id` you queried, not
the type label.
- **Duplicate-looking rules at different scopes are normal** after
years of per-user self-service; when auditing, collapse by
`value` + `rule_type` across scopes to see the real posture.
## Related Skills
- [quarantine-and-messages](../quarantine-and-messages/SKILL.md) — where the false-positive evidence comes from
- [api-patterns](../api-patterns/SKILL.md) — scope/scope_id fundamentals
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!