**Status:** Accepted
Scanned 9/20/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add woditschka/agentic-coding-reference --skill adr --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Adr?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/woditschka-adr-agentic-coding-reference)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
# The Docs Audit Is One Command: `brief-review` Becomes `audit-docs` and Runs the Doctor
**Status:** Accepted
## Context
The harness splits docs validation into two engines by design ([docs-as-API](2026-06-12-docs-as-harness-project-api.md)): the `doctor` skill runs deterministic, blocking, CI-runnable structural checks, and the `brief-review` skill runs the advisory judgment pass — principle form, enforceability, cross-document coherence. The split is correct; its surfacing was not.
Two problems compounded:
1. **`brief-review` was undiscoverable.** The name is precise inside the harness's vocabulary: the `docs/` roster *is* the project's "brief." But nobody asking "check my docs against a high bar, individually and against each other" thinks the word "brief." Users reached for a docs audit and did not find it.
2. **The old `/lint-docs` was dissolved** into the doctor, `brief-review`, and `audit-agents`, removing the one obvious entry point and leaving no command whose name matched the intent. The result: two separately-named skills, neither resonant, for what a user experiences as one task.
## Decision
**Rename `brief-review` → `audit-docs`, and make the renamed skill run the full audit: the doctor first, then the judgment review, reporting both.**
- **The name matches the intent and the family.** `audit-docs` says what it does and sits beside the existing `audit-agents` and (root) `audit-consistency` skills.
- **One command, two passes.** `audit-docs` runs the doctor (structural, deterministic) first; on a structurally-valid brief it adds the judgment pass (each document individually, and in combination). It reports the doctor's pass/fail line and the judgment findings together.
- **The engines stay separate underneath.** The doctor remains a standalone, model-free script — still the blocking gate, still CI-runnable on its own. `audit-docs` is the human-facing orchestrator over it, not a replacement. The deterministic-vs-judgment boundary the docs-as-API ADR established is preserved at the mechanism level.
- **No alias is kept.** `brief-review` is gone, not aliased — consistent with retiring `/seed` rather than carrying a stale second name. ADRs and the README Project History keep the old name as historical record.
## Consequences
**Positive:**
- A single resonant command audits the docs the way users describe the task — individually and against each other.
- The structural pass can no longer be forgotten: it is the first step of the audit, not a separate command a user must remember to run first.
- Naming is consistent across the `audit-*` skills.
**Negative:**
- "Audit" reads slightly gate-like, while the judgment half is advisory. Mitigated in the skill's description and prose: the doctor gates, the judgment pass advises.
- The doctor is still invocable on its own (for CI), so there are two ways to run the structural check. Acceptable: CI wants the bare deterministic script; humans want the one-command audit.
- The rename touched `harness/core`, the stack agent rosters, both samples (re-materialized), and the root docs. ADRs keep the old name, so historical references stay accurate.
## Notes
Renames the judgment skill introduced in [docs-as-API](2026-06-12-docs-as-harness-project-api.md) and referenced by [complete-replacement materialize](2026-06-13-materialize-complete-replacement.md). Those records stand as written; this ADR changes the skill's name and folds the doctor run into it.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!