Skip to content
Back to skills

Vendor Check

ASecurity

Run third-party due diligence on a vendor / supplier / counterparty. Verify legal standing, sanctions / denied-party screening, ESG posture, certificate status, insurance, data-security posture, prior findings, and required agreements (MSA, DPA, SOW, etc.). Use when onboarding a new supplier, switching providers, or qualifying a SaaS vendor that will touch regulated data.

  • 10 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added August 31, 2026
ai-agentsgosecurity

Works with

  • cli

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned August 31, 2026

npx -y skills add WenzhuoXu/lawgent --skill vendor-check --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Vendor Check?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Vendor Check
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/wenzhuoxu-vendor-check/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/wenzhuoxu-vendor-check)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: vendor-check
description: Run third-party due diligence on a vendor / supplier / counterparty. Verify legal standing, sanctions / denied-party screening, ESG posture, certificate status, insurance, data-security posture, prior findings, and required agreements (MSA, DPA, SOW, etc.). Use when onboarding a new supplier, switching providers, or qualifying a SaaS vendor that will touch regulated data.
argument-hint: "<vendor name and proposed scope>"
allowed_connectors: [ecfr_search, eurlex_search, "pkulaw_*", flk_npc_search]
rag_collections: [general]
---

# /vendor-check — Third-Party Diligence

Produce the analytical bundle the orchestrator turns into a vendor-onboarding
memo + scoring sheet.

**Not legal advice.** The bundle drives a recommendation; counsel + the
business owner approve onboarding.

## Output Contract (binding)

Same as `/playbook/general_playbook.md` §4 and §5:

````
## Findings
- [self-contained claim, ONE sentence, ≤60 English words, inline pinpoint `[Source, art./§/p.]`] (label: treaty | regulation | case | guidance | local-law | best-practice | risk | drafting)
- ...

## Out of scope
- ...

## Sources
- [source name] — [URL or local path] — supports findings #X[, online-checked: yes/no, pinpoint: confirmed/unavailable]
````

Hard ceiling **≤ 2000 characters**. No scoring tables — orchestrator
authors those at presentation time.

## Inputs

- **Vendor / counterparty** (legal name, jurisdiction, parent / UBO).
- **Proposed scope** (services, data flows, geography, duration, value).
- **Risk posture** of the engagement (low / medium / high) per playbook.

## Generic diligence checklist

1. **Legal standing** — entity exists, in good standing, not in bankruptcy
   / liquidation; UBO disclosed.
2. **Sanctions / denied-party screening** — OFAC / EU / UN / UK / MOFCOM /
   BIS / DDTC; PEP and adverse-media check.
3. **Licensing / certification** — any sector-specific cert required for
   the proposed scope (data security, financial conduct, healthcare,
   environmental, safety).
4. **Insurance** — liability / cyber / E&O / product-liability minima per
   business risk; additional-insured / waiver-of-subrogation availability.
5. **Data-protection posture** — DPA available, sub-processors disclosed,
   cross-border transfer pathway (PIPL / GDPR / SCC / CAC SCC), security
   certifications (ISO 27001 / SOC 2 Type II), encryption + access
   controls.
6. **Financial standing** — solvency check, audited financials if material
   contract, indemnity-coverage capacity.
7. **Anti-corruption / ESG** — code of conduct, modern-slavery statement
   where applicable, climate disclosures where applicable.
8. **Prior findings / litigation** — adverse-media + court / regulator
   records (use `flk_npc_search`, `courtlistener_search`).
9. **Required agreements** — MSA, SOW, DPA, security addendum, audit-rights
   addendum, IP terms, exit-and-transition.

## Workflow

1. Capture inputs + scope.
2. Apply the checklist; surface one Finding per item with a status
   (`confirmed` / `gap` / `risk`) and the required next step.
3. Add risk-band signal (low / medium / high) inline per Finding.
4. Flag any **deal-breaker** items separately as a top Finding.

## Pointers

- Authority hierarchy + citation: `/playbook/general_playbook.md` §0 + §2.
- Universal risk defaults (data, sanctions, regulator disclosure):
  general playbook §6.
- When the **aviation** pack is active, also apply
  `/domains/aviation/overlays/vendor-check.md` for industry-specific
  certification, capability, and data-flow diligence.

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.