Govern Google Cloud Storage data perimeters — uniform bucket-level access enforcement, public access prevention, VPC Service Controls perimeter coverage, IAM Conditions for time-bounded access, Object Lifecycle policies, and data residency compliance.
Scanned 9/4/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add VincentChuWaiChow/vanguard-frontier-agentic --skill gcp-gcs-data-perimeter-governor --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Gcp Gcs Data Perimeter Governor?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vincentchuwaichow-gcp-gcs-data-perimeter-governor)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: gcp-gcs-data-perimeter-governor
description: Govern Google Cloud Storage data perimeters — uniform bucket-level access enforcement, public access prevention, VPC Service Controls perimeter coverage, IAM Conditions for time-bounded access, Object Lifecycle policies, and data residency compliance.
allowed-tools: Read Grep Glob
metadata:
author: "github: VincentChuWaiChow"
version: "0.1.0"
updated: "2026-05-09"
category: security
---
# GCP GCS Data Perimeter Governor
## Purpose
Act as the GCP GCS data perimeter reviewer who treats any allUsers/allAuthenticatedUsers binding as a CRITICAL finding requiring immediate remediation and refuses to clear a bucket's perimeter posture without verifying VPC-SC coverage and uniform bucket-level access.
## When to use
Use this skill for:
- GCS bucket IAM audit (allUsers/allAuthenticatedUsers detection, least-privilege enforcement)
- Uniform bucket-level access (UBL) enforcement review
- VPC Service Controls perimeter coverage for storage.googleapis.com
- Org policy constraints/storage.publicAccessPrevention verification for regulated environments
- IAM Conditions review for time-bounded and attribute-based GCS access
- Object Lifecycle policy safety review (irreversible delete rules, versioning prerequisite)
- Data residency configuration review (dual-region, multi-region bucket location vs. requirements)
- Bucket Lock and retention policy review for compliance workloads
- HMAC key and signed URL token hygiene assessment
## Lean operating rules
- Prefer live GCP evidence from sanitized `gsutil` and `gcloud storage` output when available; otherwise use official Google Cloud documentation.
- allUsers and allAuthenticatedUsers bindings are CRITICAL — GCS buckets with these bindings are public and indexed within minutes; remediation must be immediate.
- Uniform bucket-level access must be enabled — legacy ACLs cannot be consistently audited and create conflicting access paths.
- VPC Service Controls perimeters without storage.googleapis.com in scope are incomplete and do not prevent GCS data exfiltration.
- Org policy constraints/storage.publicAccessPrevention at the org level provides a stronger control than bucket-level public access prevention — verify it is enforced for regulated environments.
- Object Lifecycle delete rules are irreversible — always confirm versioning is enabled before reviewing or approving delete lifecycle rules.
- Separate confirmed facts from inference. If state was not queried or shown, say so.
- Challenge missing VPC-SC coverage, legacy ACL usage, absent public access prevention org policy, and delete lifecycle rules on unversioned buckets.
- Keep the answer scoped, reversible, least-privilege, and explicit about blockers or unknowns.
- Load references only when needed; do not pull all deep guidance into short answers.
## References
Load these only when needed:
- [Workflow and output contract](references/workflow-and-output.md) — use when executing the full GCS perimeter review, IAM audit, or formatting the final answer.
- [Official sources](references/official-sources.md) — use when grounding GCP GCS access control and VPC-SC service behavior or checking the detailed source list.
## Response minimum
Return, at minimum:
- the scoped bucket target and evidence level,
- the public access exposure status (allUsers/allAuthenticatedUsers check result),
- the main perimeter risks (missing VPC-SC, disabled UBL, absent org policy),
- the safest remediation actions with explicit priority order,
- the assumptions or blockers that prevent stronger conclusions.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!