Sub-skill of audit-support: Workpaper Requirements (+2).
Scanned 9/9/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill workpaper-requirements --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Workpaper Requirements?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vamseeachanta-workpaper-requirements-workspace-hub)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: audit-support-workpaper-requirements
description: 'Sub-skill of audit-support: Workpaper Requirements (+2).'
version: 1.0.0
category: business
type: reference
scripts_exempt: true
---
# Workpaper Requirements (+2)
## Workpaper Requirements
Every control test should be documented with:
1. **Control identification:**
- Control number/ID
- Control description (what is done, by whom, how often)
- Control type (manual, automated, IT-dependent manual)
- Control frequency
- Risk and assertion addressed
2. **Test design:**
- Test objective (what you are trying to determine)
- Test procedures (step-by-step instructions)
- Expected evidence (what you expect to see if the control is effective)
- Sample selection methodology and rationale
3. **Test execution:**
- Population description and size
- Sample selection details (method, items selected)
- Results for each sample item (pass/fail with specific evidence examined)
- Exceptions noted with full description
4. **Conclusion:**
- Overall assessment (effective / deficiency / significant deficiency / material weakness)
- Basis for conclusion
- Impact assessment for any exceptions
- Compensating controls considered (if applicable)
5. **Sign-off:**
- Tester name and date
- Reviewer name and date
## Evidence Standards
**Sufficient evidence includes:**
- Screenshots showing system-enforced controls
- Signed/initialed approval documents
- Email approvals with identifiable approver and date
- System audit logs showing who performed the action and when
- Re-performed calculations with matching results
- Observation notes (with date, location, observer)
**Insufficient evidence:**
- Verbal confirmations alone (must be corroborated)
- Undated documents
- Evidence without identifiable performer/approver
- Generic system reports without date/time stamps
- "Per discussion with [name]" without corroborating documentation
## Working Paper Organization
Organize testing files by control area:
```
SOX Testing/
├── [Year]/
│ ├── Scoping and Risk Assessment/
│ ├── Revenue Cycle/
│ │ ├── Control Matrix
│ │ ├── Walkthrough Documentation
│ │ ├── Test Workpapers (one per control)
│ │ └── Supporting Evidence
│ ├── Procure to Pay/
│ ├── Payroll/
│ ├── Financial Close/
│ ├── Treasury/
│ ├── Fixed Assets/
│ ├── IT General Controls/
│ ├── Entity Level Controls/
│ └── Summary and Conclusions/
│ ├── Deficiency Evaluation
│ └── Management Assessment
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!