Screen incoming NDAs using a 10-point evaluation checklist with GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification
Scanned 9/9/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add vamseeachanta/workspace-hub --skill nda-triage --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Nda Triage?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/vamseeachanta-nda-triage-workspace-hub)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: nda-triage
description: "Screen incoming NDAs using a 10-point evaluation checklist with GREEN/YELLOW/RED classification"
type: reference
version: 1.0.0
category: business
last_updated: 2026-02-03
source: https://github.com/anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
related_skills:
- contract-review
- compliance
- canned-responses
- legal-risk-assessment
- meeting-briefing
capabilities: []
requires: []
see_also: []
tags: []
---
# NDA Triage Skill
This document outlines a systematic framework for screening incoming Non-Disclosure Agreements within an in-house legal environment.
## Core Structure
The skill uses a 10-point evaluation checklist covering agreement structure, confidential information definitions, receiving party obligations, standard carveouts, permitted disclosures, term duration, return/destruction provisions, remedies, problematic provisions, and governing law.
## Classification System
**GREEN (Standard Approval)**: Agreements meeting all standard criteria proceed through delegation of authority without counsel involvement.
**YELLOW (Counsel Review)**: Documents with minor deviations -- such as broader than preferred but not unreasonable definitions or slightly extended timeframes -- require focused legal review for potential redlines.
**RED (Significant Issues)**: Agreements containing problematic elements like missing critical carveouts, non-compete provisions, or overbroad definitions require full legal assessment before any execution.
## Key Principle
The framework emphasizes that this assistance does not provide legal advice and all analysis should be reviewed by qualified legal professionals before reliance.
The document provides specific guidance on common issues like overbroad definitions, missing independent development carveouts, and improper non-solicitation provisions, offering standard positions and redlining approaches for each scenario.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!