A decision board for evidence-based calls — the human adjudicates, the agent runs the errands. Three layers (sources → ideas → output) in plain markdown, synced on the human's command, projected onto a visual canvas. Use for vendor/tool selection, literature reviews, due diligence, competitive analysis, or any contested call that must stand on traceable evidence — triggers like "file these papers", "put this on the board", "assemble the design", "how do we decide this".
Scanned 8/30/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add tigerless-labs/design-harness --skill design-harness --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Design Harness?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/tigerless-labs-design-harness)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: design-harness
description: A decision board for evidence-based calls — the human adjudicates, the agent runs the errands. Three layers (sources → ideas → output) in plain markdown, synced on the human's command, projected onto a visual canvas. Use for vendor/tool selection, literature reviews, due diligence, competitive analysis, or any contested call that must stand on traceable evidence — triggers like "file these papers", "put this on the board", "assemble the design", "how do we decide this".
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Bash(python3 ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/*)
metadata:
author: tigerless-labs
repository: https://github.com/tigerless-labs/design-harness
---
# design-harness — the human adjudicates, the agent runs errands
Markdown is the **single source of truth**; the canvas HTML, every layer index, and the
location registry are projections, rebuildable at any time. Judgment comes only from the
human; you lay out options and evidence and run the errands — never adjudicate in the
human's place.
## Structure
### Workspace layout
```
<workspace>/
├── target.md the human's acceptance criteria; source of the output form
├── logs.md append-only change ledger (see "Disciplines · Ledger")
├── index.md workspace entry point
├── sources/<type>/*.md ① evidence: one source, one card
├── ideas/*.md ② judgments (archive/ holds archived cards)
├── output/… ③ assembly; internal structure set by the chosen output form
└── board/*.md free surface: one file, one board
```
A host may hold many workspaces under any directory names; the sole registry is
`.design-harness/config.json` at the host root — discovery trusts the registry, never
the directory name.
Every layer also carries an `index.md`, grouped under tag headings (`## TAG: one line on
why they belong together`), unclassified cards flat at the end after a `---` divider and
an *unclassified* marker. Search goes through the indexes; there is no classification
layer.
### Three layers + the free surface
1. **sources/ — evidence.** One source, one card, filed under `sources/<type>/`. The
agent ingests and grades freely, and invents the type directories itself — no preset
list; name them after what the source is (papers, github, podcasts, …), adding
directories as needed. The directory name projects verbatim as the card's badge on
the canvas.
2. **ideas/ — judgments.** **Judgment comes only from the human**: decision judgments the
human voices in conversation are transcribed into idea cards automatically, and the
human can simply ask for a card to be added; the agent transcribes, never invents.
Two states: live (the file exists) and archived (moved into `ideas/archive/`, never
deleted). A new idea repeating an old card's judgment merges automatically; a
conflicting one puts both on the board for the human to pick.
3. **output/ — assembly, the convergent layer.** **First assembly is human-initiated**;
its form comes from [references/output-forms/](references/output-forms/system-design.md)
and the human's `target.md`. Ideas diverge, output converges: output changes only on
the human's word (see "Workflow · Sync").
One free surface besides: **board/** — the human's own boards, one markdown file per
board (comparison matrices, theme grids, any scratch reasoning). **No schema, no
required fields** — this freedom belongs to the human; edit only when asked ("lay these
three sources out as a comparison").
### Card schema and templates
- A card = **frontmatter + title + summary**. No fixed sections; references are inline
links in the summary.
- `ideas/` cards (including `archive/`): frontmatter **requires `id` and `type`**;
`tags` and `conflicts` optional (see "Exactly three structured facts"). No status
field — the file's existence is the live state, sitting under `archive/` is the
archived state.
- `sources/` cards: frontmatter optional; when present only `tags` is read.
- `board/` documents: **no schema**. The board is **terminal**: it may reference any
layer, but sources/ideas/output must never reference the board — distill a board's
conclusions into idea cards.
idea card template:
```markdown
---
id: <kebab-slug, matching the filename>
type: idea
tags: [<at most one; omit the whole line>]
conflicts: [<ids of prior cards this judgment contends with; omit when none>]
---
# <the judgment in one sentence>
<Summary: what the judgment says and why; the evidence and prior cards it stands on as
inline links.>
```
source card template:
```markdown
---
tags: [<at most one; the whole frontmatter may be omitted>]
---
# <source name + one-line characterization>
<Core content + relevance to this project; the original provenance (arXiv/URL/date/
authors) as inline links.>
```
target template:
```markdown
# target — acceptance criteria for the output
## Purpose
(One paragraph: what this workspace decides, for whom, and where the boundaries are.)
## Current requirements
- (One checkable requirement per line.)
## Fulfilment map
- (Requirement → output file mapping, updated with each assembly.)
```
### Exactly three structured facts
1. **References** — inline markdown links in the card body. Forward only: a link points
at the evidence or prior cards this card stands on, never at supporters. "Who cites
me" is a projection-derived backlink, never written down. **Acyclic**: mutual
references mean the two cards should merge, or one edge is a mistakenly written
backlink — delete it.
2. **Tags** — single level, **at most one per card**, optional. A card that truly
belongs to two tags is two cards: split it. No tag just means unclassified. Tags may
be proposed by the human or assigned by the agent.
3. **Conflict** — the optional `conflicts: [<other card's id>]` in the **newer** card's
frontmatter, declaring a judgment conflict with prior cards (written on the new card
only, acyclic, same direction as references). The field lives exactly as long as the
conflict: the human's adjudication removes it — archive the loser and the edge
vanishes with the card; rewrite in place and the entry is deleted. The indexes'
pending-conflict annotations derive from this field.
Everything else — backlinks, distances, coordinates, clusters, index groupings — is
derived and never enters the truth.
### Rendering contract — the engine's minimum
Everything projection needs. **This section is the engine; everything else in this file
is methodology**, freely reconfigurable per schema — one engine serves many thin
schemas, a new scenario is a new schema configuration rather than a new engine; the
contract binds files, and the CLI is only the first host.
- Four layer names: `sources/` and `ideas/` become canvas nodes, `output/` and `board/`
become document panels. Paths containing an `archive/` segment are excluded;
`index.md` is excluded.
- Files are UTF-8 markdown.
- Frontmatter is optional; when present it must close (`---` … `---`).
Everything else degrades without breaking: no H1 → show the filename stem; no tag → the
*unclassified* group; any source type directory → the name projects verbatim;
unresolvable link → no edge. Silent data loss is a validator error, never waved through:
markdown under an unknown top-level directory, or frontmatter opened but never closed,
is INVALID.
### Canvas — the only projection surface
The canvas is the human's main thinking surface and **only a projection** — it holds no
facts and accepts no writes that bypass markdown. It doubles as the sharing surface:
every card links back to its evidence, so handing someone the board hands them the
reasoning behind the design. There is exactly one canvas — the
unified canvas ([template](canvas/template.html); its interaction contract lives in the
workspace's canvas module doc) — and exactly one builder: the rules (truth-driven,
edges = in-card references, layout derived from references + tags) are built in, and
the workspace path is the only required input. Conflict edges render **red** — a
template-base default every style pack inherits and may override.
Visual style is pure CSS, living entirely in the `canvas/styles/` style pack; the
template carries a single `/*__CSS__*/` slot and no CSS of its own. The default build
embeds the whole pack plus the top-right toolbar switcher — the human reskins live there
(every open starts from the pin-and-paper native look); you only hint at the switcher
once. `--css canvas/styles/<slug>/canvas.css` pins one style with no switcher — to name
a slug, read [canvas/styles/selection-index.json](canvas/styles/selection-index.json),
never bulk-read the whole pack. Never fork the template or the builder for looks; when a
style's `design.md` changes, recompile its `canvas.css` in the same change — the spec is
the truth (the pack validator checks the dual palettes and bans external reach).
## Workflow
0. **Discover the workspace** (the first step on every trigger). Order: a path the human
gives > the `.design-harness/config.json` registry > the default
`docs/design-harness/`. More than one candidate, or zero: ask — **never initialize a
new workspace silently** (init in the wrong place forks the truth). The canvas path
follows the same rule: whichever of the two locations the registry is missing —
the workspace, or the `"canvas"` key — is asked as an option picker, one prompt when
both are missing; canvas options are `docs/canvas.html` (keeps zero-workflow GitHub
Pages open: that mode serves only `/` or `/docs`) and beside-the-workspace; record
the choice under the registry's `"canvas"` key. Only
the bootstrap writes the registry; on finding a workspace the registry missed, re-run
the bootstrap to record it. A fresh bootstrap ends by asking the human for the target
(purpose and acceptance criteria, in the human's words) — transcribe the answer into
`target.md`, never invent one; the human may defer. Scripts run at the host project root (`<skill-dir>` is
wherever this skill is installed):
```bash
python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/discover_workspace.py # prints which workspace resolves
python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/init_workspace.py <workspace> # bootstrap: skeleton + registry + both validators
```
1. **Ingest evidence**: file source cards, grade, anchor to provenance; source
disagreements go on the board as-is.
2. **Transcribe judgments**: judgments the human voices in conversation transcribe into
idea cards automatically; same-judgment cards merge automatically, conflicts go on
the board for the human to pick; derive references and tag classification (one
pass — both are relationship reads).
3. **Sync (on the human's command, never automatic)**: idea → output re-derivation runs
only when the human orders it — apply directly with a one-line receipt, a diff first
for large changes; re-derive the affected elements, never rewrite the whole document.
A human edit to output is itself an adjudication: back-transcribe it into idea cards
automatically (transcription only). Target changes follow the same discipline as idea
changes. When output lags you may hint once ("output is N ideas behind"), never
twice.
4. **Assemble**: first assembly is human-initiated; the form comes from `target.md` +
the output-forms library — when the human sets a target, recommend a form from the
library; if `target.md` is still blank when assembly is called for, ask for the
target once more before recommending; the first is **system-design** (mermaid diagrams are the markdown body
itself, plus a `modules/` layer, one module per file). Anchor every output claim to
evidence; write principles as bullet lists, one principle per bullet — so each can be
referenced, edited, and ledgered on its own; in the system-design form the diagram
IS the markdown body: mermaid blocks carry `click` declarations into module files.
5. **Project and deliver**: whenever the truth changes, regenerate the touched layers'
indexes, rebuild the canvas, and republish in the same turn; append the ledger.
```bash
python3 <skill-dir>/scripts/build_canvas.py <workspace> -o <temp-dir> [--css …] [--title '…']
```
Without `<workspace>` the tool discovers on its own (registry → default location) and
refuses to act on ambiguity. `-o` takes a directory (the file lands inside as
`canvas.html`) or a `.html` path written as-is. Build targets are the fixed
`canvas.html` beside the workspace — commit it when the workspace lives in git, so
whoever gets the repo gets the board — or a temp dir or artifact for throwaway views;
the builder refuses to write inside the workspace either way. A build is not delivered until the human holds a clickable link. The
product is one fully self-contained HTML file (all dependencies inlined, zero network
requests). **The default delivery is a published HTML link**: publish as an artifact
or the host's hosted pages ([GitHub Pages recipe](references/publish-canvas-github-pages.md))
and hand over that URL; in Claude Code (a local CLI
session) a local link suffices — an absolute `file://…/canvas.html` URL or a local
static server. **Every rebuild reuses the existing link** — mint a new one only when
the human asks. So the link survives the session: record the delivery target — the
HTML output path or the published link — under a `"canvas"` key in the
`.design-harness/config.json` registry, and read it back before building; later
sessions then rebuild the same file and republish the same link.
### Teach in place, never lecture
- First contact (the workspace just bootstrapped, whether the skill fired passively or
on demand): the first move is always to build the workspace, construct the initial
canvas in the same turn, hand over the link, then orient in one sentence — "From now
on every resource we look into files itself, and the decision judgments we talk
through land on the board; you can also just ask me to change things, and tell me
whenever you want the design assembled." Never repeat it.
- The workspace is young, no output yet: leave the assembly seat visibly empty — say
once "output starts on the human's word".
- Ideas look mature: suggest assembly in one sentence; never push twice.
- The human asks for output too early: comply, deliver the honestly thin result, and say
which ideas are missing — never refuse.
- First assembly: state the sync rule in one sentence ("from here output updates only
when you order a sync; edit output directly and I back-transcribe it into ideas").
- Every sync: give a one-line receipt of what was re-derived or back-transcribed.
## Disciplines
- **The never list**: never pick sides, never invent judgments, never archive an idea on
your own, never initiate first assembly on your own, never touch output outside the
human's command.
- **Markdown first**: change the truth first, then rebuild every affected projection
(indexes, canvas HTML) in the same turn; never edit a projection directly. Projections
hold no facts and rebuild wholesale from markdown — committing one (the shared canvas)
never promotes it to truth, and a committed canvas rides in the same change as the
truth edit that made it stale.
- **The ledger**: `logs.md` is append-only and covers both ideas **and** output. Every
change, one line per touched layer:
```
- YYYY-MM-DD · card or doc · action · delta (old → new) · reason
```
Record **the delta itself** — the minimal old → new — not just the action and reason.
When the workspace sits outside git, the ledger is the only way back.
- **Validation**: two validators — `scripts/check_workspace.py` and
`scripts/check_doc_links.py` — run automatically at bootstrap and on every canvas
build: failure exits nonzero, prints the full problem list, and produces no HTML; fix
the truth, then rebuild. When this file's contract changes, the validators change in
the same commit.
## Toolbox
All live in `<skill-dir>/scripts/` and run standalone; command syntax sits at the usage
sites (workflow steps 0 and 5).
- `init_workspace.py` — bootstrap: skeleton (idempotent, never clobbers) + registry
write + runs both validators itself.
- `discover_workspace.py` — read-only discovery, prints which workspace resolves;
ambiguity is reported, never resolved silently.
- `build_canvas.py` — the only canvas build entry; runs both validators as a gate, then
emits the self-contained HTML.
- `check_workspace.py` — schema validation: required frontmatter, single tag, conflicts
targets, forward-only acyclic references, no inbound board references.
- `check_doc_links.py` — link integrity: no dangling links inside the workspace.
- `check_style_pack.py` — style pack validation: dual palettes, no external reach,
tokens aligned to the template.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!