Drafting a security agreement for a whole business securitization where the collateral includes operating contracts, intellectual property, deposit accounts, and equipment, requiring layered cash management mechanics, perfection steps for each collateral type, and identification of pre-existing lien and consent issues before closing.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add sunyifeisb-art/legalwork --skill draft-security-agreement --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Draft Security Agreement?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sunyifeisb-art-draft-security-agreement)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: draft-security-agreement-whole-business
task_id: structured-finance-securitization/draft-security-agreement
description: Drafting a security agreement for a whole business securitization where the collateral includes operating contracts, intellectual property, deposit accounts, and equipment, requiring layered cash management mechanics, perfection steps for each collateral type, and identification of pre-existing lien and consent issues before closing.
activates_for: [planner, solver, checker]
---
# Skill: Draft Security Agreement for Whole Business Securitization Collateral Perfection
## 1. Subject-matter triage
- Treat the assignment as primary-document drafting, not a memo exercise: produce the security agreement first, then any ancillary notes only if needed.
- Read the deal documents for the asset perimeter, account structure, lien status, and consent dependencies before drafting operative provisions.
- Identify whether the collateral package is broad-form “substantially all assets” or if carveouts, excluded property, or special-purpose accounts require tighter drafting.
- If multiple asset classes or account types appear, map each one before drafting to avoid leaving any perfection step or control mechanic implicit.
## 2. Failure modes the skill is correcting
- Drafting a generic security grant that fails to track the transaction’s operating assets, proceeds, and collateral-specific perfection mechanics.
- Collapsing separate cash-management regimes into one vague sweep concept and thereby obscuring trigger levels, activation timing, and operational consequences.
- Omitting how security is perfected in deposit accounts, general intangibles, equipment, and registered intellectual property under the governing UCC framework.
- Ignoring anti-assignment language in operating contracts or other restrictive covenants that must be addressed for a security interest to be effective.
- Failing to surface pre-existing liens, fixture issues, or equipment encumbrances that must be released, bonded, or expressly tolerated as permitted liens.
- Leaving control agreements, special-purpose accounts, or collection-account designations as informal drafting notes instead of operative closing deliverables.
- Stating insurance covenants in generic terms without tying coverage scope, limits, and notice obligations to the collateral and the transaction structure.
- Drafting conclusions about lien validity or perfection without naming the statutory or contractual authority that supports the position.
## 3. Legal frameworks / domain conventions that apply
- Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code governs the security interest in most personal-property collateral, including general intangibles, equipment, inventory, and proceeds; perfection mechanics vary by collateral type.
- Deposit accounts are typically perfected by control rather than by filing alone; control agreements are usually treated as closing deliverables for accounts that matter to the cash waterfall.
- Registered intellectual property may require financing-statement coverage plus separate recording steps in the applicable federal or registry system; non-registered IP and know-how are handled as general intangibles.
- Anti-assignment restrictions in operating contracts and similar agreements may be limited by UCC and applicable non-UCC overrides; the drafting should state the intended effect without overclaiming.
- Cash trapping and rapid amortization are distinct cash-management states and should be drafted as separate regimes with clear triggers, duration, and consequences.
- Special-purpose, escrow, tax, reserve, or collection accounts should be described separately so the secured party’s rights and the grantor’s use limitations are not implied by a general account grant.
- Fixtures and equipment can be affected by real-property liens or lessor interests; the security agreement should distinguish property owned outright from property subject to another party’s superior rights.
- Insurance undertakings should identify required coverages, minimum limits, lenders’ loss payee or additional insured status where appropriate, and notice of lapse or material change.
- When the transaction documents identify conditions precedent, treat them as operative closing mechanics in the security agreement or related closing deliverables.
- Cite the controlling authority for each legal proposition used, such as UCC Article 9 provisions, applicable anti-assignment override rules, and any transaction-specific contractual consent framework.
## 4. Analytical scaffolds
1. Collateral inventory: build the grant around each collateral class actually used in the transaction — operating contracts, IP, deposit accounts, equipment, inventory, general intangibles, instruments, chattel paper, documents, fixtures if applicable, and proceeds.
2. Perfection path by collateral type: for each class, specify the method of attachment/perfection, any needed filing or recording, and any closing deliverable that makes perfection effective.
3. Contract-rights analysis: flag provisions restricting assignment, sublicensing, or pledge; preserve the security grant while respecting statutory or contractual limits on enforcement.
4. Cash-management architecture: draft separate mechanics for ordinary control, cash trapping, and rapid amortization, with distinct triggers and a clear handoff between regimes.
5. Deposit-account control: identify every account needing a control agreement, and align the account description with the waterfall, reserve mechanics, and any use restrictions.
6. IP treatment: separate registered rights from unregistered rights and know-how, and match the collateral description to the correct filing or recordation route.
7. Lien review: convert diligence findings into drafting outcomes — release, subordination, permitted-lien carveout, or closing condition.
8. Fixture and equipment issues: test whether any item is subject to landlord, lessor, or mortgage-related claims, and draft the grant and exclusions accordingly.
9. Insurance package: align required coverages and notice mechanics to the collateral base, transaction risk profile, and any named secured-party interests.
10. Closing mechanics: turn all necessary releases, consents, control agreements, and recordations into express closing conditions or operative covenants.
11. Authority support: when stating a perfection or enforceability proposition, identify the governing UCC section, federal recording rule, or other controlling authority in the drafting note or clause reference.
12. Drafting discipline: keep the operative agreement tight, but use schedules for asset lists, account lists, IP lists, and identified lien issues so the main document stays modular.
## 5. Vertical / structural / temporal relationships
- If cash trapping is triggered first and performance later deteriorates further, the transition to rapid amortization must be expressly sequenced so there is no gap in sweep authority or waterfall operation.
- If a deposit account is both controlled and subject to restricted use, the control terms must preserve the restriction rather than granting unrestricted dominion.
- If a consent is needed for pledge effectiveness or enforcement, place it in the closing mechanics rather than assuming a boilerplate grant cures the issue.
- If a lien affects both equipment and fixtures, address the two property types separately because the governing perfection and priority analysis may differ.
- If an asset appears in more than one schedule or deliverable, use the same naming convention across the agreement, schedules, and closing checklist to avoid mismatch.
## 6. Output structure conventions
- Draft the security agreement as a complete operative document with defined terms, grant of security interest, representations, covenants, perfection and further assurances, cash-management provisions, insurance, remedies, and miscellaneous terms.
- Use schedules for collateral inventories, intellectual property listings, account listings, and identified liens or consent items; do not bury these in the body.
- Include a closing-conditions section or closing checklist integrated into the agreement if the transaction documents require pre-closing releases, control agreements, or recordations.
- Add a drafting-notes or issue-tracking appendix only if needed to flag unresolved diligence items, with each item tied to its legal consequence and recommended resolution.
- Keep the file output as the requested `security-agreement.docx`, and ensure the document contains operative clauses rather than a summary of what should be drafted.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!