Drafts an intercreditor agreement from source documents, using bracketed drafting notes for unresolved points and producing a closing issues memo that flags open issues and possible resolutions.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add sunyifeisb-art/legalwork --skill draft-intercreditor-agreement --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Draft Intercreditor Agreement?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sunyifeisb-art-draft-intercreditor-agreement)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: draft-intercreditor-agreement
task_id: banking-finance/draft-intercreditor-agreement
description: Drafts an intercreditor agreement from source documents, using bracketed drafting notes for unresolved points and producing a closing issues memo that flags open issues and possible resolutions.
activates_for: [planner, solver, checker]
---
# Skill: First Lien / Second Lien Intercreditor Agreement Drafting (First-Lien Favorable)
## 1. Subject-matter triage
- Identify the governing debt stack, collateral package, and enforcement hierarchy before drafting any operative text.
- Determine whether the source set gives the same enforcement authority to one collateral agent or splits authority among different agents; resolve agency mechanics explicitly.
- Separate provisions that are truly settled from those needing bracketed drafting notes; do not guess on economics, lien priority, or enforcement sequencing when the sources are incomplete.
- Treat the agreement as the primary deliverable and the closing issues memo as secondary support; the draft must exist as a complete, operative file before any memo is finalized.
## 2. Failure modes the skill is correcting
- Drafting a standstill period without limiting recycling, which lets the first lien waive and reimpose the standstill repeatedly.
- Defining DIP capacity too broadly, so the cap effectively swallows interest, fees, or other obligations instead of staying tied to principal.
- Writing automatic lien release mechanics so broadly that a first-lien enforcement path can be used to strip junior lien value in a restructuring.
- Using an absolute waiver of adequate protection cash payments without a savings clause, creating enforceability risk.
- Omitting an all-or-nothing purchase option structure, exercise window, or correct payoff mechanics.
- Leaving amendment restrictions asymmetric or incomplete, especially on maturity, rates, collateral, commitments, maintenance covenants, and mandatory prepayments.
- Failing to preserve permitted refinancing flexibility while protecting the junior lien from a more burdensome replacement structure.
- Hiding unresolved conflicts in prose instead of flagging them with bracketed notes and a closing issues memo.
## 3. Legal frameworks / domain conventions that apply
- Standstill and remedies: the junior lender’s enforcement restrictions should be time-bound, subject to a recycling limit, and aligned with the source debt documents and applicable collateral enforcement mechanics.
- DIP financing: the first lien may be permitted to support debtor-in-possession financing up to a stated principal cap, with any broader formulation flagged as ambiguous and potentially overinclusive.
- Automatic release and lien subordination: release mechanics should be limited to the intended enforcement context and should not be drafted so broadly that they facilitate value-stripping transactions beyond the bargain.
- Adequate protection: any waiver of cash adequate protection should include a savings clause for enforceability and, where appropriate, preserve non-waivable statutory rights under bankruptcy law.
- Purchase option: the junior purchase right should be framed as an all-or-nothing election within a defined period, with price mechanics tied to the governing debt and payoff amounts.
- Amendment restrictions: the intercreditor should restrict both sides from amending material economics or structural protections without the required consent thresholds.
- Refinancing: replacement first-lien debt should be permitted only if it does not become materially more burdensome to the junior lien than the original first-lien package.
- Collateral priority: the agreement should address revolver/term-loan ordering, protective advances, and any priority exceptions disclosed in the source materials.
- Authority source: if the credit documents allocate collateral enforcement authority differently, the intercreditor must specify which representative acts for enforcement, release, and consent mechanics.
## 4. Analytical scaffolds
- Start with a clause-by-clause inventory of the source instructions and mark each point as settled, bracketed, or conflicted.
- Draft first-lien-favorable operative language, then layer in junior-protection exceptions only where the source documents or market convention require them.
- For each open point, add a bracketed drafting note that states the conflict, the proposed resolution, and the transactional consequence if left unresolved.
- When the source set admits multiple parties, tranches, time periods, or priority mechanics, enumerate the relevant variants before drafting the final clause so no category is collapsed into a generic placeholder.
- For each legal proposition embedded in the draft or memo, anchor the text to the controlling authority available from the source documents or generally recognized bankruptcy, contract, and secured-lending practice.
- Stress-test the draft for internal consistency across standstill, purchase option, automatic release, refinancing, amendment consent, and enforcement agency provisions.
- Close every identified issue with the practical consequence for the transaction and a specific drafting approach for resolution.
## 5. Vertical / structural / temporal relationships
- Map priority vertically: first-lien claims, junior-lien claims, protective advances, DIP support, and enforcement proceeds.
- Map enforcement temporally: notice, standstill, permitted actions during standstill, expiration, reinstatement limits, and post-default remedies.
- Map restructuring outcomes: refinancing, release, sale, foreclosure, bankruptcy, and purchase option trigger events.
- Map amendment timing: pre-closing drafting issues, post-closing consent events, and event-driven restrictions that are triggered by amendments to underlying debt documents.
- Where multiple tranches or agents exist, identify which document controls each step of the waterfall and which representative has authority to act.
## 6. Output structure conventions
- Produce the intercreditor agreement as the primary deliverable in complete, operative form.
- Use bracketed drafting notes for unresolved issues, including the conflict, proposed drafting path, and any fallback.
- Do not leave placeholders where operative language is available from the source set.
- Include a closing issues memo that is concise but complete, with each issue paired to a proposed resolution and practical consequence.
- If the source set contains competing formulations, preserve the first-lien-favorable choice in the draft and call out the alternative in brackets rather than silently harmonizing it.
- The memo should end with explicit recommended actions, naming the responsible party and the timing anchor for follow-up.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!