Drafts a guaranty agreement using the provided template and source documents, and prepares a cover memo flagging open issues, material template changes, and authorization deficiencies.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add sunyifeisb-art/legalwork --skill draft-guaranty-agreement --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Draft Guaranty Agreement?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sunyifeisb-art-draft-guaranty-agreement)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: draft-guaranty-agreement
task_id: banking-finance/draft-guaranty-agreement
description: Drafts a guaranty agreement using the provided template and source documents, and prepares a cover memo flagging open issues, material template changes, and authorization deficiencies.
activates_for: [planner, solver, checker]
---
# Skill: Parent Guaranty Agreement Drafting with Cover Memo
## 1. Subject-matter triage
- Confirm the primary deliverable is the operative guaranty draft, with the cover memo as a secondary advisory document.
- If the sources include multiple drafting variants, borrower/guarantor entities, or execution options, enumerate them first and draft against the one actually supported by the materials.
- Use the source documents to identify the facility context, governing law, notice mechanics, signatories, and any approval limits before finalizing language.
- Draft the agreement first; only after the agreement file is complete should the cover memo be prepared.
## 2. Failure modes the skill is correcting
- Drafting a guaranty without stating whether it is a guaranty of payment or of collection, when direct enforcement is intended.
- Omitting the standard “absolute, unconditional, and continuing” formulation or using those concepts inconsistently across the operative provisions.
- Leaving out customary suretyship-defense waivers that preserve lender enforcement despite notice, acceptance, or procedural objections.
- Failing to include a fraudulent transfer / enforceability savings clause that caps liability at the maximum amount permitted by applicable law.
- Missing a mismatch between transaction exposure and the approving authority in the organizational resolutions or other authorization materials.
- Overlooking the relationship between subrogation waivers, reimbursement claims, and any contribution rights among co-guarantors.
- Inserting template language that conflicts with the source set on notice addresses, execution blocks, governing law, or defined terms.
- Treating the cover memo as a generic summary instead of a targeted issue-spotting note identifying material deviations from the template.
## 3. Legal frameworks / domain conventions that apply
- Guaranty of payment vs. collection: state the intended enforcement model expressly and draft consistently with direct recourse if that is the transaction structure.
- Absolute, unconditional, continuing guaranty: use the customary formulation to avoid arguments that performance conditions or termination events limit enforcement.
- Suretyship waivers: include the customary waivers of presentment, demand, protest, notice of acceptance, notice of nonpayment, diligence, and similar defenses where supported by the sources.
- Fraudulent transfer / enforceability savings clause: tie liability to the maximum enforceable amount under applicable law, using the governing-law concept reflected in the draft.
- Authorization consistency: compare resolutions, consents, incumbency materials, and any cap language against the guaranteed obligation and flag any shortfall.
- Subrogation and reimbursement: determine whether the guarantor’s rights are postponed until the lender is paid in full so the guarantor does not compete with the lender.
- Contribution rights among co-guarantors: if multiple guarantors exist, preserve, subordinate, or coordinate contribution rights in a way that matches the transaction structure.
- Claim coordination: reconcile any waiver of claims against the borrower with the treatment of claims against other guarantors and explain the intended allocation in the memo.
- Notice and execution mechanics: follow the source documents for notice details, counterpart execution, and signature authority rather than relying on generic template assumptions.
## 4. Analytical scaffolds
1. Enforcement model: confirm whether the agreement should allow immediate demand on the guarantor or require prior pursuit of the borrower, and draft the operative clause accordingly.
2. Scope and duration: verify the guaranty covers the intended obligations, remains continuing until release, and aligns with the credit facility definition set.
3. Waiver package: check that the suretyship-defense waivers are complete and internally consistent across all operative sections.
4. Savings clause: ensure the enforceability limitation is tied to the proper legal standard and does not undercut the payment guaranty beyond what law requires.
5. Authorization review: compare the approving documents to the exposed obligation and identify any cap, signer, or entity mismatch.
6. Claim hierarchy: confirm the lender’s claims stay senior to any reimbursement, subrogation, or contribution claims until the debt is fully satisfied.
7. Co-guarantor coordination: if more than one guarantor is involved, ensure the draft handles inter-guarantor contribution and common defenses consistently.
8. Source alignment: reconcile defined terms, references, and exhibits with the template and source package so the final draft does not contain orphaned or inconsistent provisions.
9. Notice / signature mechanics: populate notices, addresses, and signature blocks from the transaction materials and confirm each required signer is included.
10. Cover memo framing: identify material deviations from the template, open issues, and action items; separate drafting choices from unresolved business or legal questions.
11. Authority support: cite the contractual, statutory, or doctrinal basis for each legal proposition relied on in the memo or drafting notes.
## 5. Vertical / structural / temporal relationships
- Keep lender remedies structurally senior to guarantor reimbursement, subrogation, and contribution rights until all secured obligations are paid in full.
- Preserve the temporal sequence between authorization, execution, delivery, and effectiveness so any condition precedent language matches the transaction timeline.
- If the source materials show a cap, threshold, or limitation at one level and a broader obligation at another, surface the mismatch in the memo and avoid silently expanding authority in the draft.
- Where the facility contemplates multiple obligors or phases, make clear which obligations are guaranteed now and which are reserved or excluded.
## 6. Output structure conventions
- Guaranty agreement draft: deliver a complete, operative agreement with defined terms, operative guaranty provisions, waivers, savings language, notices, execution blocks, and any needed schedules or exhibits.
- Cover memo to partner: identify the material template changes, open legal or factual issues, authorization deficiencies, and recommended follow-up.
- In the memo, distinguish drafting edits from judgment calls and note why each material deviation from the template was made.
- Use conventional legal drafting headings and internal organization; do not mirror any hidden evaluation checklist.
- Before finishing, confirm the guaranty draft file is complete and non-empty, then confirm the cover memo file is complete and non-empty.
- If the sources do not support a point, flag it as open rather than inventing language to fill the gap.
- Keep the drafting style conservative, bankable, and internally consistent with the transaction documents.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!