Draft Estate Accounting Report

---
name: draft-estate-accounting-report
task_id: trusts-estates-private-client/draft-estate-accounting-report
description: Drafting a first and final judicial accounting for a surrogate’s court submission requires reconciling the fiduciary’s summary against underlying financial records, classifying receipts and disbursements into the proper accounting schedules, computing any fiduciary compensation under the applicable statutory framework, and explaining investment performance and distribution calculations in a manner consistent with the governing estate administration rules.
activates_for: [planner, solver, checker]
---

# Skill: Draft Formal Judicial Accounting Report (First and Final Account) for Surrogate's Court Submission

## 1. Subject-matter triage

Determine the account period, the governing decedent’s estate administration framework, and whether the file contains one account or multiple periods that must be carried forward. Identify all asset classes, all sources of receipts, all disbursements, and all distributions before drafting any schedule.

Treat the fiduciary’s summary as a lead document, not the controlling record. Reconcile it against bank statements, brokerage records, closing statements, invoices, canceled checks, tax records, and distribution support. If the source set includes multiple account periods, intermediary filings, or alternative summaries, enumerate them first and then reconcile each period separately.

## 2. Failure modes the skill is correcting

- Using the fiduciary’s summary as the sole source without reconciling it to underlying statements and transaction records
- Misclassifying sale proceeds, recurring earnings, claims payments, administration expenses, or distributions into the wrong schedule
- Omitting items that appear in source records but not in the fiduciary summary
- Failing to explain why an item is principal, income, gain/loss, expense, or distribution under the accounting rules
- Accepting fiduciary compensation without testing it against the governing statutory or court-approved method and without disclosing waiver or deviation
- Omitting support for investment decisions, retention choices, or losses where the account reflects unusual portfolio activity
- Producing a distribution schedule that does not match the dispositive scheme or that double-counts specific property
- Leaving discrepancies identified but unresolved rather than quantified and tied back to source documents

## 3. Legal frameworks / domain conventions that apply

- Judicial accounting form: state the accounting period precisely; use the conventional schedules for principal received, income received, losses/decreases, disbursements, and distributions; and present a final balance that can be traced through the account
- Estate valuation and basis: use the estate’s date-of-death valuation framework as the starting point for post-death gains and losses
- Principal vs. income: classify receipts according to the legal character of the asset and the timing of receipt; sale proceeds are not income absent a specific accounting basis
- Real property and investment transactions: separate closing proceeds, carrying costs, and recurring earnings into their correct accounting treatment
- Fiduciary compensation: apply the governing statutory compensation framework and disclose any waiver, reduction, or agreement affecting the amount
- Prudence standard: evaluate investment decisions under the applicable fiduciary prudence rule and explain material losses or concentration decisions in the narrative
- Specific gifts and interim distributions: record them once in the schedule that reflects their legal character and avoid duplication in residuary computations
- Accrual allocation: allocate interest and similar items between pre-death and post-death periods according to the governing accounting rules
- Governing authority: cite the controlling estate accounting, fiduciary compensation, and prudent-investor authorities relied on in the narrative and schedules; do not state a legal conclusion without naming the rule that supports it

## 4. Analytical scaffolds

1. Enumerate the accounting periods, accounts, and transaction categories before analysis if more than one is present
2. Reconcile the fiduciary summary against every underlying source document and isolate all mismatches, omissions, and duplicate items
3. Classify each receipt, disbursement, gain, loss, and distribution into the correct schedule and explain the legal basis for the classification
4. Compute gains or losses from the proper valuation baseline and confirm whether each item belongs in principal or income
5. Calculate fiduciary compensation under the governing method, compare it to the amount actually taken, and disclose any waiver, reduction, or adjustment
6. Assess any investment losses, unusual trades, or retention decisions under the applicable prudence standard and explain the narrative consequence
7. Build the proposed final distribution from the net accounting result after debts, expenses, specific distributions, and administration costs are satisfied
8. For each identified discrepancy, state the source document conflict, the amount or scale implicated, the affected schedule, and the practical consequence for the account

## 5. Vertical / structural / temporal relationships

The accounting runs from date of death through the filing date, unless the file contains an earlier interim account that must be rolled forward. Opening balances, interim distributions, and prior approvals must be carried into the final account so the ending balance ties across all schedules.

Track vertical dependencies across the account: receipts feed principal or income schedules; those schedules feed losses, disbursements, and distributions; and those items feed the residuary computation. A distribution cannot be shown before the account establishes the assets available for distribution.

Where the source set contains multiple beneficiaries, multiple property types, or multiple transaction dates, keep each line item tied to its own source document and period. Do not collapse distinct items into a single blended narrative when the accounting requires separate treatment.

## 6. Output structure conventions

- Draft a complete judicial accounting document with operative schedules, not a narrative summary of what the schedules would contain
- Use conventional account headings and numbering so each line item can be traced from source document to schedule to final balance
- Include explanatory narrative for significant receipts, unusual disbursements, sales, investment activity, compensation, and distributions
- Include a discrepancies memo that identifies each mismatch between the fiduciary summary and source records, quantifies the item where possible, cites the conflicting sources, and explains the resolution
- Include a proposed final distribution table that shows each beneficiary’s entitlement under the dispositive scheme and the resulting residue
- State the controlling legal authorities used for compensation, accounting treatment, and fiduciary prudence in the narrative or notes where those rules are applied
- Write the deliverable so it is ready for court submission and internally consistent across schedules, narratives, and the discrepancies memo