Draft Amendment To Credit Agreement

---
name: draft-amendment-to-credit-agreement
task_id: banking-finance/draft-amendment-to-credit-agreement
description: Drafts a credit agreement amendment in standard market form incorporating an additional financing tranche or other covenant changes, and prepares an issues memo flagging cross-document inconsistencies and unresolved points.
activates_for: [planner, solver, checker]
---

# Skill: Credit Agreement Amendment Drafting — Standard Form with Issues Memo

## 1. Subject-matter triage (only if applicable)
- Confirm whether the assignment is a pure amendment, an amendment-and-restatement, or an amendment that also adds a new tranche, reprices debt, extends maturity, or changes covenants.
- Identify all source documents up front: the operative credit agreement, every prior amendment, any term sheet, side emails, notice letters, schedules, and exhibits that affect economics or mechanics.
- Determine whether there is one integrated borrower group and lender group or multiple affected cohorts whose rights change differently; do not treat a mixed-consent transaction as a single-bucket edit.
- If the source set contains competing drafts or inconsistent business terms, preserve the operative deal points in the amendment and isolate the conflicts in the issues memo rather than silently harmonizing them.

## 2. Failure modes the skill is correcting
- Drafting amendment text without the core structural elements needed for a credit agreement amendment, such as recitals, definitions, amendment article, effectiveness conditions, representations, and signature blocks.
- Failing to reconcile existing amortization schedules, maturity mechanics, or prepayment provisions with a new, extended, or repriced tranche.
- Omitting a mechanism to address non-consenting lenders when the amendment creates different lender classes or different treatment.
- Leaving unresolved economic or legal points as blank spaces instead of using bracketed alternatives and clear fallback options.
- Producing an issues memo that merely lists conflicts without ranking them, tying them to the source documents, or stating the transaction consequence.
- Drafting a memo without concrete next steps, responsible parties, or timing guidance.

## 3. Legal frameworks / domain conventions that apply
- Use standard LSTA-style amendment architecture: recitals, defined terms, operative amendment provisions, effectiveness conditions, releases or waivers if needed, reaffirmation language, miscellaneous provisions, and signature blocks.
- Recitals should accurately identify the operative agreement and prior amendments; mismatched dates, titles, or amendment history can create interpretation problems.
- Amendment mechanics should specify exactly which sections are being revised, added, or deleted, and should preserve untouched provisions by negative implication only where the drafting is unambiguous.
- If a new tranche or amended tranche is added, coordinate margin, benchmark floor, amortization, maturity, optional prepayment, mandatory prepayment, and yield-protection mechanics so the economics are internally consistent.
- If covenant relief is granted, define the relief period precisely and state whether thresholds, baskets, or step-ups reset, freeze, or transition over time.
- If addbacks or financial definition changes are introduced, include the support or certification mechanics that the deal requires for testing and delivery.
- If the transaction changes lender economics across cohorts, consider consent thresholds, deemed consent mechanics, replacement lender concepts, assignment mechanics, and any restrictions on holdouts.
- Use bracketed alternatives for unresolved deal points, and avoid pretending open business terms are final.
- For the issues memo, each item should identify the conflict, explain the interaction among documents, and state why it matters to execution, enforcement, or closing.

## 4. Analytical scaffolds
1. Map the source set: operative agreement, each amendment, business terms, and ancillary communications.
2. Reconstruct the deal path: what is changing, why it is changing, and which provisions must move together.
3. Reconcile definitions and mechanics: terms, schedules, covenants, pricing, maturities, prepayments, and conditions precedent.
4. Draft the amendment in operative form: recitals, defined terms, section-by-section edits, conditions, reaffirmations, and signatures.
5. Flag open points with brackets: preserve negotiation choices without embedding false certainty.
6. Review for document harmonization: confirm the amendment aligns with referenced schedules, notices, fee letters, and any summary of terms.
7. Prepare the issues memo as a separate advisory document: rank issues, explain the inconsistency, identify the source documents involved, and recommend the next step.
8. Where the source documents provide dates, amounts, thresholds, cohorts, or term dates, state them consistently across the amendment and memo; do not invent missing business terms.
9. When the source set contains multiple affected parties, terms, or time periods, enumerate them before analysis and address each distinctly rather than collapsing them into one generalized treatment.
10. For every issue raised in the memo, state the severity level using a fixed ordinal scale defined at the top, then close with the governing source conflict, the practical consequence, and a recommended fix.

## 5. Vertical / structural / temporal relationships (only if applicable)
- Track how the amendment changes downstream documents and mechanics: schedules, notices, lender consents, payoff calculations, waterfall provisions, and any linked conditions precedent.
- Check whether the amendment’s effectiveness is conditional on delivery of executed counterparts, lien releases, officer certificates, legal opinions, bring-downs, or evidence of authority.
- Confirm that the signature pages match the parties whose rights are being changed and that any lender consents are captured by the correct cohort.
- If any deadline, reset date, or measurement date appears in more than one document, reconcile them expressly and flag any mismatch.
- If one document contemplates a new obligation and another assumes the old structure, surface that mismatch as a closing issue rather than normalizing it away.

## 6. Output structure conventions
- Produce the amendment as a clean, market-standard draft with operative clauses, not a note or summary of proposed edits.
- Use clear bracketed placeholders only where the business deal is unresolved or the source documents conflict.
- Keep defined terms consistent with the operative credit agreement unless the amendment expressly changes them.
- Draft the issues memo as a separate, organized advisory document with: a short severity legend, numbered issues, a concise explanation of each conflict, the source documents implicated, the practical impact, and a recommended resolution or next step.
- In each memo issue, tie the point to the relevant source provisions or market convention by name and section where possible, rather than using abstract commentary.
- End the memo with a concise Recommended Actions section that assigns each action to a role and a timing anchor tied to signing, syndication, closing, or another deal milestone.
- Before finishing, verify that the primary deliverable file is the amendment draft and that the issues memo is secondary; both should be complete, internally consistent, and non-empty.