Harden GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and similar pipelines against supply-chain attacks, secret exfiltration, and pwn-request abuse. Use when authoring or reviewing workflow files, adding a third-party action, image, or script, wiring cloud or registry credentials into CI, or triaging a suspected pipeline compromise.
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add ShieldNet-360/secure-vibe --skill cicd-security --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Cicd Security?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/shieldnet-360-cicd-security)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: cicd-security
description: "Harden GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and similar pipelines against supply-chain attacks, secret exfiltration, and pwn-request abuse. Use when authoring or reviewing workflow files, adding a third-party action, image, or script, wiring cloud or registry credentials into CI, or triaging a suspected pipeline compromise."
---
<!-- Native skill bundle for agent-skills (cross-tool convention). Generated by `secure-vibe dev regenerate`. -->
<!-- Do not edit by hand; the source of truth is skills/cicd-security/SKILL.md. -->
# CI/CD Pipeline Security
Harden GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and similar pipelines against supply-chain attacks, secret exfiltration, and pwn-request abuse. Use when authoring or reviewing workflow files, adding a third-party action, image, or script, wiring cloud or registry credentials into CI, or triaging a suspected pipeline compromise.
## ALWAYS
- Pin every third-party GitHub Action by **commit SHA** (full 40-char), never by a floating tag (`@v1`, `@main`, `@latest`) — tags can be re-pushed. The tj-actions/changed-files March 2025 incident exfiltrated secrets from 23,000+ repositories specifically because consumers used floating tags. Same applies to GitLab CI `include:` references and reusable workflows. Renovate / Dependabot can keep the SHA pins fresh.
- Declare `permissions:` at the workflow or job level and default to `contents: read` only. Grant additional scopes (`id-token: write`, `packages: write`, etc.) job-by-job, never workflow-wide.
- Use **OIDC** (`id-token: write` + cloud provider trust policy) for short-lived cloud credentials. Never store long-lived AWS / GCP / Azure keys as GitHub Secrets.
- Treat `pull_request_target`, `workflow_run`, and any `pull_request` job that uses `actions/checkout` with `ref: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.ref }}` as **trusted-context-on-untrusted-code** — the "pwn request" pattern documented by GitHub Security Lab. Either don't run them, or run with no secrets and no write tokens. A fork's GitLab merge-request pipeline is the same shape — it runs the fork's own `.gitlab-ci.yml` on your runners: isolate them, expose no protected variables.
- Echo every untrusted expression (`${{ github.event.* }}`) through an environment variable first; never interpolate it directly into `run:` body — that's the canonical GitHub Actions script-injection sink. The GitLab sink has the same shape: `$CI_*` / `$TRIGGER_*` interpolated into `bash -c` or `eval`, where merge-request metadata carries the shell metacharacters.
- Sign release artifacts (Sigstore / cosign) and publish SLSA provenance attestations. Verify provenance in any consumer pipeline that pulls the artifact.
- Pin `runs-on` to a dated runner image (`ubuntu-24.04`), not a floating label (`ubuntu-latest`) — the label moves underneath you. On GitLab, use ephemeral Docker-executor runners with `privileged: false`; a shared shell runner with `privileged: true` gives a compromised job root on the host. An egress firewall on runners handling secrets (StepSecurity Harden-Runner or equivalent) is defense-in-depth on top of that, not a substitute.
- Require a human reviewer on a dependency-bump PR when `supply-chain-security` raises a **trust-boundary** change — a maintainer or ownership change, a new or changed install hook, a registry or source transition, a provenance regression. Gate on that signal, not on the version number: a patch release that changes maintainer warrants more review than a major bump that does not.
- Consult `supply-chain-security` before any dependency install step (`npm install`, `pip install`, `docker pull`) — in CI it is untrusted code execution on a runner holding your credentials. It owns install-script risk (`postinstall`, `setup.py`, `build.rs`) and registry pinning; `container-security` names the command that fixes the lockfile half (`npm ci`, `--frozen-lockfile`) rather than adding flags to `npm install`.
## NEVER
- `curl | bash` (or `wget -O- | sh`) any installer script in CI. The 2021 Codecov bash-uploader compromise exfiltrated env vars to an attacker for ~10 weeks because thousands of pipelines ran `bash <(curl https://codecov.io/bash)`. Always download, checksum, then execute.
- Echo secrets to logs, even on failure. Use `::add-mask::` for any computed-at-runtime secret, and double-check with the GitHub workflow-log search.
- Cache mutable state (e.g. `~/.npm`, `~/.cargo`, `~/.gradle`) keyed only on `os`. A cache hit cross-job is a cross-tenant attack surface — key on a lockfile hash and scope to the workflow ref.
- Trust artifact downloads from arbitrary workflow runs without verifying the source workflow + commit SHA. Build-cache poisoning works through unscoped artifact reuse.
- Store secrets in repository variables (`vars.*`) — they are plaintext to anyone with read access. Only `secrets.*` are gated by the secret scanning + scope rules. GitLab's equivalent: a CI/CD variable without `protected: true` + `masked: true` is exposed to every feature-branch pipeline.
## KNOWN FALSE POSITIVES
- First-party actions in the same organization that you mirror or fork in-house may legitimately be pinned by tag if the org enforces signed tags + branch-protection on the action repo.
- Public-data pipelines that handle no secrets and produce no signed artifact (e.g. nightly link-checkers) don't need OIDC or SLSA provenance, and may use floating tags without practical impact.
- `pull_request_target` is legitimate for label / triage bots that only call the GitHub API with the minimal scopes needed, do not check out PR code, and don't expose secrets in env.
## Reference files
Read these only when the task calls for them.
- `references/verifying-findings.md`
Scanned 9/6/2026
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!