Reads docker-compose, env files, ORM configs, and connection strings to map current infrastructure. Flags missing layers (cache, queue, analytics) based on observed access patterns. Outputs a structured infrastructure manifest.
Scanned 6/12/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add SethGammon/Citadel --skill infra-audit --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Infra Audit?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/sethgammon-infra-audit)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: infra-audit
license: MIT
description: >-
Reads docker-compose, env files, ORM configs, and connection strings to map
current infrastructure. Flags missing layers (cache, queue, analytics) based
on observed access patterns. Outputs a structured infrastructure manifest.
user-invocable: true
auto-trigger: false
trigger_keywords:
- infra
- infrastructure
- what databases
- what systems
- docker-compose
- infra audit
- map infrastructure
- what does this connect to
last-updated: 2026-03-29
---
# /infra-audit -- Infrastructure Auditor
## When to Use
- Before adding a new database, cache, or queue to a project
- When onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase and need to understand its infra
- Before planning a workspace campaign that spans multiple services
- When someone asks "what systems does this project talk to?"
**Do not use when:**
- The user already knows the infra and just wants to wire something up (use `/architect`)
- The question is about code architecture, not infrastructure (use `/research`)
## Protocol
### Step 1: DISCOVER
Scan the project for infrastructure configuration files. Check each category:
**Container orchestration:**
- `docker-compose.yml`, `docker-compose.*.yml`
- `Dockerfile`, `*.dockerfile`
- `k8s/`, `kubernetes/`, `helm/`, `charts/`
**Environment and secrets:**
- `.env`, `.env.*`, `.env.example`, `.env.local`
- `*.env` files in config directories
**Database and ORM:**
- Prisma: `prisma/schema.prisma`
- Drizzle: `drizzle.config.ts`, `drizzle/`
- TypeORM: `ormconfig.*`, `data-source.ts`
- Sequelize: `.sequelizerc`, `config/database.*`
- Knex: `knexfile.*`
- SQLAlchemy: `alembic.ini`, `alembic/`
- Django: `settings.py` (DATABASES section)
- Rails: `config/database.yml`
- Go: look for `pgx`, `gorm`, `sqlx` in go.mod
**Message queues and event streaming:**
- Redis: connection strings, `ioredis`, `redis` in package.json/requirements.txt/go.mod
- RabbitMQ: `amqplib`, `pika`, `amqp` imports
- Kafka: `kafkajs`, `confluent-kafka`, `sarama` imports
- NATS: `nats`, `nats.go` imports
- SQS/SNS: `@aws-sdk/client-sqs`, `boto3` sqs references
**Cache:**
- Redis (dual-use -- note if used as cache vs. pub/sub vs. primary store)
- Memcached: `memcached`, `pylibmc` imports
**Search:**
- Elasticsearch: `@elastic/elasticsearch`, `elasticsearch-py`
- Meilisearch, Typesense, Algolia client libraries
**Object storage:**
- S3: `@aws-sdk/client-s3`, `boto3` s3 references
- MinIO, GCS, Azure Blob client libraries
**External APIs:**
- Stripe, Twilio, SendGrid, Auth0, Firebase, Supabase client libraries
- Any `NEXT_PUBLIC_*` or `VITE_*` env vars pointing to external services
**CI/CD:**
- `.github/workflows/`, `.gitlab-ci.yml`, `Jenkinsfile`, `bitbucket-pipelines.yml`
For each discovered item, record:
- **What**: the system (e.g., "PostgreSQL 15")
- **Where**: config file path and line
- **How**: connection method (direct, pooled, ORM, SDK)
- **Role**: primary store, cache, queue, search, auth, etc.
### Step 2: TRACE CONNECTIONS
For each discovered system, trace how the application connects:
1. Find connection strings in env files or config
2. Find the client initialization code (imports, `new Client()`, `createPool()`)
3. Identify which modules/services use this connection
4. Note connection pooling, retry logic, health checks if present
Build a connection graph:
```
App --> [pool: 10] --> PostgreSQL (primary store)
App --> [ioredis] --> Redis (cache + pub/sub)
App --> [SDK] --> Stripe (payments)
```
### Step 3: ANALYZE PATTERNS
Based on what's connected and how it's used, identify:
**Access patterns:**
- Read-heavy vs. write-heavy (look at query patterns in ORM usage)
- Real-time vs. batch (WebSocket/SSE presence, cron jobs)
- Request/response vs. event-driven (queue usage, webhook handlers)
**Missing layers** (flag only when evidence supports the need):
| Signal | Likely Missing | Evidence Required |
|---|---|---|
| Repeated identical DB queries in hot paths | Cache layer (Redis/Memcached) | Same query in 3+ request handlers |
| `setTimeout`/`setInterval` for deferred work | Job queue (Bull/BullMQ/Celery) | Processing that doesn't need to block the response |
| Full-text search via `LIKE '%term%'` | Search engine (Elasticsearch/Meilisearch) | Text search on >10K rows |
| Large file uploads stored in DB or local disk | Object storage (S3/MinIO) | Binary columns or `fs.writeFile` for user content |
| Analytics queries on production tables | Analytics DB (Snowflake/BigQuery/ClickHouse) | Aggregation queries mixed with OLTP |
| Multiple services sharing one DB | Event bus or API gateway | 2+ repos writing to same schema |
| No connection pooling | Connection pooler (PgBouncer) | Direct connections in serverless/high-concurrency |
**Do not flag something as missing unless the evidence is in the code.**
### Step 4: WRITE MANIFEST
Output the infrastructure manifest to `.planning/infra-manifest.md`:
```markdown
# Infrastructure Manifest
> Generated: {ISO date}
> Project: {project name from package.json or repo name}
## Current Systems
### {System Name} -- {Role}
- **Type**: {database|cache|queue|search|storage|auth|payments|...}
- **Product**: {PostgreSQL 15|Redis 7|Stripe SDK|...}
- **Config**: `{file path}`
- **Connection**: {method -- pooled, direct, SDK, ORM}
- **Used by**: {modules/services that import the client}
(repeat for each system)
## Connection Graph
{ASCII diagram of connections -- use /ascii-diagram conventions}
## Access Patterns
- {Pattern 1}: {evidence}
- {Pattern 2}: {evidence}
## Opportunities
### {Opportunity Title}
- **Signal**: {what in the code suggests this}
- **System**: {what would address it -- e.g., "Redis as cache layer"}
- **Impact**: {what improves -- latency, scalability, separation of concerns}
- **Effort**: low | medium | high
(repeat for each opportunity)
## Multi-Repo Considerations
{If the project references other repos, APIs, or shared databases, note them here.
This section feeds directly into /workspace if the user wants to act on opportunities
that span repos.}
```
### Step 5: RETURN
Present a summary to the user:
- How many systems found
- The connection graph (inline, not just in the file)
- Top opportunities ranked by signal strength
- Whether any opportunities would require multi-repo coordination (suggest `/workspace`)
## Fringe Cases
- **No docker-compose or env files**: Scan for hardcoded connection strings in source code.
Many projects connect without formal config files. Check `src/`, `lib/`, `config/` for
connection patterns. Note the absence of externalized config as a finding.
- **Monorepo with multiple services**: Treat each service directory as a separate scan target.
Produce one manifest with sections per service. Note shared databases across services.
- **`.planning/` does not exist**: Create it before writing the manifest.
- **No infrastructure found**: Report that the project appears to be client-only or has no
external dependencies. This is a valid finding, not an error.
- **Secrets in env files**: Never include actual secret values in the manifest. Record the
variable name and which system it connects to, not the value.
## Contextual Gates
**Disclosure:** "Auditing infrastructure configuration. No files modified."
**Reversibility:** green — read-only audit; only writes `.planning/infra-manifest.md`; undo with `rm .planning/infra-manifest.md`.
**Trust gates:**
- Any: full audit, manifest generation, opportunity analysis.
## Quality Gates
- [ ] Every discovered system has: type, product, config path, connection method
- [ ] Connection graph covers all discovered systems
- [ ] Opportunities cite specific code evidence (file:line), not speculation
- [ ] No secret values appear in the manifest
- [ ] Manifest written to `.planning/infra-manifest.md`
- [ ] Multi-repo considerations section populated if cross-repo signals exist
## Exit Protocol
```
---HANDOFF---
- Scanned {N} config files, found {M} external systems
- Key systems: {list top 3-4}
- Top opportunity: {highest-signal opportunity}
- Multi-repo scope: {yes/no -- if yes, suggest /workspace}
- Reversibility: green — delete .planning/infra-manifest.md to undo
---
```
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!