[omh] Hermes backend workflow: prepare server, API, and data-layer contracts — auth boundary, error paths, response shape, and schema/migration discipline — before implementation. Use when the user says: backend, back-end, back end, backend skill, server side, server-side, api design, api contract.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill omh-backend --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Omh Backend?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/rlaope-omh-backend)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: "omh-backend"
description: "[omh] Hermes backend workflow: prepare server, API, and data-layer contracts — auth boundary, error paths, response shape, and schema/migration discipline — before implementation. Use when the user says: backend, back-end, back end, backend skill, server side, server-side, api design, api contract."
metadata:
hermes:
tags: [workflow, oh-my-hermes, planning]
category: planning
phase: backend-design
role: planner
quality_tier: backend-contract-gated
---
# Backend
This is a Hermes-native `backend` workflow skill.
## Why This Exists
`backend` gives OMH a first-class server-side workflow so Hermes can prepare auth boundaries, error paths, response shapes, and migration order without becoming the hidden runtime that executes them.
## Do Not Use When
- The request is about web UI, layout, or a design system; use `frontend`.
- The request is a security posture or threat review rather than a service design; use `security-safety-review`.
- The request is to run or judge the verification of an already-built service; use `verification-gate`.
- The request is a Rust-language change whose risk is compiler, ownership, or `unsafe` discipline; use `rust`.
## Examples
Good example:
- Prompt: Design a REST API with a Postgres schema and migrations for the billing service.
- Expected behavior: Prepare backend_service_contract/v1, auth_boundary_map/v1, error_path_table/v1, response_shape_contract/v1, and schema_migration_plan/v1, then hand off with the per-stack reference named.
- Why: The request is server-side design across an endpoint surface and its storage, before any code exists.
Bad example:
- Prompt: The migration is written, so mark the schema as migrated and the API as live.
- Expected behavior: Mark migration application, integration runs, and deployment as not_observed and name the smallest observed proof for each.
- Why: A prepared migration plan is not an applied migration, and a contract is not a running service.
## Completion Checklist
- The surface, its callers, and each caller's trust level are named.
- The auth_boundary_map/v1 states where trust changes and which check enforces it on every path.
- The error_path_table/v1 covers each failure mode with status, body shape, retryability, and redaction rule.
- The response_shape_contract/v1 is consistent across endpoints rather than per-endpoint improvisation.
- Storage changes carry an expand/backfill/switch/contract order with a rollback point per step.
- The handoff names the executor, the stack, and the per-stack reference to load first.
- Implementation, migrations, integration runs, and deployment stay observed-only.
## Recovery Notes
- If the stack or datastore is unknown, prepare the contract stack-neutral and name the stack as the one blocking input.
- If the auth model cannot be established, stop at the auth boundary gap instead of designing endpoints that assume a trust level.
## Workflow Lane
- Current lane: **Coding handoff** (`idea-to-deploy`, `llm-app-dev`, `cto-loop`, `deploy-and-monitor`, `code-review`, `build-failure-triage`, `verification-gate`, `security-safety-review`, `+13 more`) - coding owners, handoffs, review, CI, and merge evidence.
- If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to `oh-my-hermes` or name the adjacent workflow.
- Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`.
## Use When
Use when Hermes should shape a server, API, or data-layer change before implementation: authentication boundary, contract error paths, response consistency, schema and migration discipline, and the per-stack reference the executor loads first.
Strong routing signals: `backend`, `back-end`, `back end`, `backend skill`, `server side`, `server-side`, `api design`, `api contract`, `rest api`, `graphql api`, `grpc service`, `endpoint design`, `auth boundary`, `authentication flow`, `authorization rules`, `idempotency key`, `pagination contract`, `database schema`, `postgres schema`, `schema migration`, `db migration`, `orm mapping`, `connection pool`, `message queue`, `webhook handler`, `バックエンド`, `エンドポイント設計`, `認証フロー`, `スキーマ移行`, `백엔드`, `서버 개발`, `서버 api`, `api 설계`, `인증 흐름`, `권한 체크`, `디비 스키마`, `db 스키마`, `스키마 마이그레이션`, `엔드포인트 설계`, `后端`, `後端`, `接口设计`, `认证流程`, `数据库迁移`
## Catalog Metadata
Category: `planning`
Phase: `backend-design`
Hermes role: `planner`
Quality tier: `backend-contract-gated`
Reasoning demand: `standard`
Quality bar:
- Name the surface, its callers, and their trust level before any endpoint or table is designed.
- Load `references/service-contract.md` and fill the auth boundary, error-path table, and response-shape rules from it rather than improvising a per-endpoint shape.
- When the change touches storage, load `references/schema-migration.md` and order the migration as expand, backfill, switch, contract, with the rollback point named per step.
- Hold the `api` product-family expectations — authentication boundary, contract error paths, response consistency — as the standing bar for every prepared endpoint.
- Name the per-stack reference the executor must read first; the stack is a routing input, not a detail discovered mid-implementation.
- Keep implementation, migration application, integration runs, load testing, and deployment as observed-only evidence.
Handoff policy:
Keep the service contract, auth boundary, error-path table, and migration plan in Hermes. Record code changes, running servers, applied migrations, integration runs, and load results only from executor or wrapper observed evidence.
Required inputs:
- the service, endpoint, or data surface being changed
- callers and their trust level (public, partner, internal, machine)
- language, framework, and datastore when known
- authentication and authorization model in force
- existing schema and migration tooling
- backward-compatibility and rollout constraints
- observed integration or load evidence for completion claims
Expected outputs:
- backend_service_contract/v1
- auth_boundary_map/v1
- error_path_table/v1
- response_shape_contract/v1
- schema_migration_plan/v1 when the change touches storage
- backend_implementation_handoff/v1
- observed_integration_evidence/v1 when observed
Artifact expectations:
- backend_service_contract/v1 names each endpoint or job, its caller class, request and response shapes, and its idempotency and pagination rules
- auth_boundary_map/v1 states where an untrusted caller becomes a trusted one, and which check runs on each path
- error_path_table/v1 pairs every failure mode with its status/code, body shape, retryability, and log/redaction rule
- response_shape_contract/v1 keeps success and error envelopes consistent across the surface instead of per-endpoint improvisation
- schema_migration_plan/v1 orders expand, backfill, switch, and contract steps with the rollback point for each
- integration runs, applied migrations, load numbers, and deployment only when observed
Safety rules:
- Do not claim implementation, a running service, an applied migration, a passing integration suite, or a deployment from a prepared backend contract.
- Require the auth boundary before endpoint work: an endpoint whose caller trust level is unnamed is not ready for handoff.
- Require the error-path table before the happy path is called complete; an unlisted failure mode is a gap, not a default.
- Treat a destructive or non-reversible migration step as a blocker until an explicit rollback point and backfill order exist.
- Never place secrets, tokens, or connection strings in the contract, examples, or handoff text.
- Do not call databases, HTTP services, LLM, or network endpoints from OMH core.
## Runtime Evidence
Preferred harness for this skill: `coding-handling`.
```sh
omh runtime record --skill backend --harness coding-handling --status started
```
Record observed delegation results; otherwise return `not_available` or `not_observed`.
Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.
- Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes.
Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion.
Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.
Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`. Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!