[omh] Hermes adaptation for durable research-goal execution. Use when the user says: autoresearch-goal, research goal, durable research, critic research.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add rlaope/oh-my-hermes --skill omh-autoresearch-goal --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Omh Autoresearch Goal?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/rlaope-omh-autoresearch-goal)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: "omh-autoresearch-goal"
description: "[omh] Hermes adaptation for durable research-goal execution. Use when the user says: autoresearch-goal, research goal, durable research, critic research."
metadata:
hermes:
tags: [workflow, oh-my-hermes, research]
category: research
phase: durable-research
role: researcher
quality_tier: validator-gated
---
# Autoresearch Goal
This is a Hermes-native `autoresearch-goal` workflow skill.
## Why This Exists
`autoresearch-goal` exists to keep `research` work explicit, evidence-backed, and inside the Hermes/executor boundary instead of relying on ad hoc chat narration.
## Do Not Use When
- The request is casual chat, a status-only acknowledgement, or another workflow has stronger routing evidence.
- The user needs implementation, review, CI, merge, or external publishing evidence that has not been delegated or observed.
## Examples
Good example:
- Prompt: autoresearch-goal: keep researching AI agent memory practices until the evidence gaps are closed or logged.
- Expected behavior: Run a durable research loop with critic checks, source gaps, and a stop or checkpoint condition.
- Why: The request is research that needs persistence and review, not a one-shot brief.
Bad example:
- Prompt: autoresearch-goal: treat casual chat or unaccepted work as if this workflow already produced verified results.
- Expected behavior: Ask a clarification question or route to a narrower workflow instead of forcing `autoresearch-goal`.
- Why: The request lacks the required inputs or would overclaim work that Hermes did not observe.
## Completion Checklist
- The research question, source boundaries, recency assumptions, and confidence level are named.
- Observed sources, inference, synthesis, and unresolved retrieval gaps are separated.
- Follow-up planning or handoff uses the research summary without calling it execution evidence.
## Recovery Notes
- If sources cannot be accessed, state the retrieval gap and use only observed local context.
- If evidence is thin or one-sided, lower confidence and ask for a narrower source boundary.
## Workflow Lane
- Current lane: **Research and company ops** (`source-finder`, `web-research`, `research`, `best-practice-research`, `autoresearch-goal`, `model-optimization`, `inference-serving`, `research-brief`, `+16 more`) - research, signals, ops, and briefings.
- If intent belongs to another lane, hand back to `oh-my-hermes` or name the adjacent workflow.
- Shared product, routing, compatibility, and evidence rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`.
## Use When
Use for validator-gated research that needs durable artifacts.
Strong routing signals: `autoresearch-goal`, `research goal`, `durable research`, `critic research`
## Catalog Metadata
Category: `research`
Phase: `durable-research`
Hermes role: `researcher`
Quality tier: `validator-gated`
Reasoning demand: `standard`
Quality bar:
- Define validator criteria before gathering evidence.
- Run each cycle as evidence-gap closure: name the open gaps the cycle targets, then stop at the validator criteria or the declared iteration budget, whichever comes first.
- Keep durable research artifacts separate from coding execution evidence.
- Stop with next questions or a source-backed synthesis when validation is incomplete.
Handoff policy:
Keep durable research in Hermes-managed artifacts; do not convert to executor handoff unless the research produces an accepted coding task.
Required inputs:
- research objective
- validator criteria
- source boundaries
Expected outputs:
- research artifact
- validator result
- next questions
Artifact expectations:
- durable research ledger or checklist
Safety rules:
- Do not imply hidden Hermes runtime behavior.
- Use the smallest verification that can prove the claim.
## Runtime Evidence
Preferred harness for this skill: `research`.
```sh
omh runtime record --skill autoresearch-goal --harness research --status started
```
Record observed delegation results; otherwise return `not_available` or `not_observed`.
Prepared OMH routing is not execution, review, CI, merge-readiness, or merge evidence.
- Treat wrapper memory/context summaries as advisory local context, not proof of opaque Hermes memory reads or changes.
Preserve workflow intent and stop conditions; verify before claiming completion.
Use Hermes-native subagent/delegation features when available: native subagents -> Hermes delegation when available, otherwise sequential lanes.
Shared product, compatibility, topology, memory, harness, and execution rules: `omh-routing/references/skill-common-rail.md`. Load it when applicable; otherwise name an unavailable capability.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!