Evaluates large language models' knowledge of hazardous topics in biosecurity, cybersecurity, and chemical security, as well as their general knowledge and fluency. It serves as a proxy for measuring dual-use risk and benchmarking unlearning methods. Use when the user wants to benchmark on WMDP, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WMDP.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill wmdp-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Wmdp Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-wmdp-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: wmdp-eval
description: Evaluates large language models' knowledge of hazardous topics in biosecurity, cybersecurity, and chemical security, as well as their general knowledge and fluency. It serves as a proxy for measuring dual-use risk and benchmarking unlearning methods. Use when the user wants to benchmark on WMDP, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports WMDP.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2403.03218
bibtex_key: li2024wmdp
confidence: high
---
# wmdp-eval
> The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning — Li et al. (2024) (arXiv:2403.03218, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates large language models' knowledge of hazardous topics in biosecurity, cybersecurity, and chemical security, as well as their general knowledge and fluency. It serves as a proxy for measuring dual-use risk and benchmarking unlearning methods.
## Datasets
- **WMDP** — total 3668; splits: test (3668)
## Metrics
- `WMDP` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly answered multiple-choice questions using top-1 logit selection. Lower scores indicate less hazardous knowledge.
- `MMLU` — range: percent
- Percentage of correctly answered multiple-choice questions across college and high school subjects.
- `MT-Bench` — range: other
- Single-evaluation mode scored by GPT-4-0613 as an automated judge.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Zero-shot multiple-choice question prompt with four options (A, B, C, D) and a trailing 'Answer:' token.
**Output**: Model generates the top logit choice (A, B, C, or D).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_accuracy(predictions, gold):
correct = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold) if p == g)
return (correct / len(gold)) * 100
```
## Common pitfalls
- WMDP scores are lower-is-better (indicated by ↓ in tables), unlike standard benchmarks where higher is better.
- MT-Bench evaluation relies on GPT-4 as an automated judge rather than exact-match or human grading.
- The benchmark uses a strict zero-shot format with a fixed prompt template; deviating from the template may alter model behavior.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We use the default lm-evaluation-harness zero-shot format for MMLU and WMDP, taking the top logit between A, B, C, and D as the answer choice. ... Table 2: Comparing base models and unlearning methods on question-answer evaluation (WMDP, MMLU) and fluency (MT-Bench). All WMDP and MMLU scores are percentage points.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{li2024wmdp,
title={The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearning},
author={Li et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2403.03218}
}
```
- arXiv: 2403.03218
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!