Evaluates long-term time series forecasting capabilities of foundation models in both zero-shot (unseen datasets) and in-distribution (fine-tuned) settings across multiple prediction horizons. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ETTh1, ETTh2, ETTm1, ETTm2, Weather, Global Temp, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports MSE.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill time-moe-forecasting-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Time Moe Forecasting Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-time-moe-forecasting-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: time-moe-forecasting-eval
description: Evaluates long-term time series forecasting capabilities of foundation models in both zero-shot (unseen datasets) and in-distribution (fine-tuned) settings across multiple prediction horizons. Use when the user wants to benchmark on ETTh1, ETTh2, ETTm1, ETTm2, Weather, Global Temp, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports MSE.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2409.16040
bibtex_key: shi2024timemoe
confidence: high
---
# time-moe-forecasting-eval
> Time-MoE: Billion-Scale Time Series Foundation Models with Mixture of Experts — Xiaoming Shi et al. (2024) (arXiv:2409.16040, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates long-term time series forecasting capabilities of foundation models in both zero-shot (unseen datasets) and in-distribution (fine-tuned) settings across multiple prediction horizons.
## Datasets
- **ETTh1** — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
- **ETTh2** — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
- **ETTm1** — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
- **ETTm2** — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
- **Weather** — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
- **Global Temp** — total ?; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `MSE` **(primary)** — range: [0, inf)
- Mean Squared Error: average of squared differences between predicted and actual values. Lower is better.
- `MAE` — range: [0, inf)
- Mean Absolute Error: average of absolute differences between predicted and actual values. Lower is better.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Time series sequences of fixed lengths (512, 1024, 2048, or 3072) corresponding to prediction horizons (96, 192, 336, or 720).
**Output**: Forecasted time series values for the specified prediction horizon.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_metrics(pred, true):
mse = np.mean((true - pred) ** 2)
mae = np.mean(np.abs(true - pred))
return {'MSE': mse, 'MAE': mae}
```
## Common pitfalls
- TimesFM is excluded from the Weather dataset evaluation due to pretraining data overlap.
- In-distribution (full-shot) evaluation strictly uses only one fine-tuning epoch.
- Input and output lengths are rigidly paired per horizon (e.g., 512 input for 96-step forecast).
- Reported averages in tables are computed across all six datasets and four horizons.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The evaluation metrics adopt mean square error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE).
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{shi2024timemoe,
title={Time-MoE: Billion-Scale Time Series Foundation Models with Mixture of Experts},
author={Xiaoming Shi et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2409.16040}
}
```
- arXiv: 2409.16040
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!