Evaluates a model's ability to perform 3D semantic segmentation on multi-parametric MRI scans of brain tumours. It probes the algorithm's capacity to distinguish and delineate multiple tumour sub-regions (edema, enhancing, non-enhancing) under high clinical variability in scanner hardware and acquisition protocols. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Task01_BrainTumour, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports semantic segmentation accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill task01-braintumour-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Task01 Braintumour Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-task01-braintumour-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: task01-braintumour-eval
description: Evaluates a model's ability to perform 3D semantic segmentation on multi-parametric MRI scans of brain tumours. It probes the algorithm's capacity to distinguish and delineate multiple tumour sub-regions (edema, enhancing, non-enhancing) under high clinical variability in scanner hardware and acquisition protocols. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Task01_BrainTumour, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports semantic segmentation accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 1902.09063
bibtex_key: simpson2019msd
confidence: high
---
# task01-braintumour-eval
> A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithms — Amber L. Simpson et al. (arXiv:1902.09063, 2019)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates a model's ability to perform 3D semantic segmentation on multi-parametric MRI scans of brain tumours. It probes the algorithm's capacity to distinguish and delineate multiple tumour sub-regions (edema, enhancing, non-enhancing) under high clinical variability in scanner hardware and acquisition protocols.
## Datasets
- **Task01_BrainTumour** — total 750; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `semantic segmentation accuracy` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Standard volumetric overlap metric, typically Dice coefficient: 2|A∩B|/(|A|+|B|), where A and B are the predicted and ground-truth segmentation masks. Measures voxel-wise overlap between predicted and expert-annotated tumour sub-regions.
## Input / output format
**Input**: 3D multi-parametric MRI volumes (T1, T1-Gd, T2, T2-FLAIR) in NIfTI format, co-registered to SRI24 atlas space, resampled to 1mm³ isotropic voxels, and skull-stripped.
**Output**: 3D segmentation mask in NIfTI format with discrete labels for each tumour sub-region (edema, enhancing, non-enhancing).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_dice(pred_mask, gold_mask):
intersection = np.sum(pred_mask * gold_mask)
union = np.sum(pred_mask) + np.sum(gold_mask)
return 2.0 * intersection / union if union > 0 else 0.0
# Compute per-sub-region, then average across sub-regions and subjects.
```
## Common pitfalls
- Images are rotated 180 degrees in the axial plane to correct misformatted headers; models must assume RAS coordinate frame.
- Multi-modal input required (4 sequences per scan); failing to concatenate or process all modalities degrades performance.
- Highly variable acquisition protocols across 19 institutions and 1T-3T scanners; models trained on single-site data often fail to generalize.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The datasets were chosen based on availability and appropriateness for semantic segmentation algorithm development. Gold standard annotations for all tumour sub-regions in all scans were approved by expert board-certified neuradiologists.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{simpson2019msd,
title={A large annotated medical image dataset for the development and evaluation of segmentation algorithms},
author={Amber L. Simpson et al.},
year={2019},
note={arXiv:1902.09063}
}
```
- arXiv: 1902.09063
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!