Evaluates named entity recognition capabilities on biomedical and social media text. It probes the model's ability to identify and classify domain-specific entities (e.g., diseases, drugs, vaccines) in both informal tweets and formal scientific abstracts under fully-supervised and few-shot learning conditions. Use when the user wants to benchmark on METS-CoV, BioRED, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Micro F1.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill mets-cov-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Mets Cov Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-mets-cov-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: mets-cov-eval
description: Evaluates named entity recognition capabilities on biomedical and social media text. It probes the model's ability to identify and classify domain-specific entities (e.g., diseases, drugs, vaccines) in both informal tweets and formal scientific abstracts under fully-supervised and few-shot learning conditions. Use when the user wants to benchmark on METS-CoV, BioRED, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Micro F1.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2510.04001
bibtex_key: zhang2025named
confidence: high
---
# mets-cov-eval
> Named Entity Recognition in COVID-19 tweets with Entity Knowledge Augmentation — Zhang et al. (2025) (arXiv:2510.04001, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates named entity recognition capabilities on biomedical and social media text. It probes the model's ability to identify and classify domain-specific entities (e.g., diseases, drugs, vaccines) in both informal tweets and formal scientific abstracts under fully-supervised and few-shot learning conditions.
## Datasets
- **METS-CoV** — total 7000; splits: test (-1)
- **BioRED** — total 600; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `Micro F1` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Harmonic mean of precision and recall calculated globally across all entity types. Precision = TP / (TP + FP), Recall = TP / (TP + FN), Micro F1 = 2 * (Precision * Recall) / (Precision + Recall).
## Input / output format
**Input**: Raw text instances (tweets or PubMed abstracts) with implicit or explicit entity boundaries to be predicted.
**Output**: Predicted entity spans with corresponding labels (e.g., BIO-tagged sequence or list of (start, end, type) tuples).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_micro_f1(preds, golds):
tp = fp = fn = 0
for p, g in zip(preds, golds):
tp += len(set(p) & set(g))
fp += len(set(p) - set(g))
fn += len(set(g) - set(p))
prec = tp / (tp + fp) if (tp + fp) > 0 else 0.0
rec = tp / (tp + fn) if (tp + fn) > 0 else 0.0
return 2 * prec * rec / (prec + rec) if (prec + rec) > 0 else 0.0
```
## Common pitfalls
- Micro F1 aggregates across all entity types, which can mask poor performance on rare or domain-specific classes like 'vaccine' or 'chemical entity'.
- Few-shot settings use fixed k-shot splits (5, 10, 20) without specifying random seeds, leading to potential variance in reported scores.
- The paper reports per-entity-type F1 in tables but only highlights the average/micro F1 in text, which may obscure class imbalance effects.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Micro F1 scores are used as our evaluation metrics. We set up 5-shot, 10-shot, and 20-shot settings for few-shot experiments.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{zhang2025named,
title={Named Entity Recognition in COVID-19 tweets with Entity Knowledge Augmentation},
author={Zhang et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2510.04001}
}
```
- arXiv: 2510.04001
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!