Evaluates a model's ability to predict IDH mutation status (mutant vs. wild-type) in glioma patients using multi-modal MRI-derived structural brain networks. Use when the user wants to benchmark on TCIA + In-house Cohort, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill idh-mutation-prediction-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Idh Mutation Prediction Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-idh-mutation-prediction-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: idh-mutation-prediction-eval
description: Evaluates a model's ability to predict IDH mutation status (mutant vs. wild-type) in glioma patients using multi-modal MRI-derived structural brain networks. Use when the user wants to benchmark on TCIA + In-house Cohort, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2109.01854
bibtex_key: wei2021idhmutation
confidence: medium
---
# idh-mutation-prediction-eval
> Predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status in glioma using structural brain networks and graph neural networks — Wei et al. (2021) (arXiv:2109.01854, 2021)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates a model's ability to predict IDH mutation status (mutant vs. wild-type) in glioma patients using multi-modal MRI-derived structural brain networks.
## Datasets
- **TCIA + In-house Cohort** — total 372; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Standard binary classification accuracy; exact evaluation metrics are not explicitly listed in the provided text, but binary cross-entropy is used for training.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Graph representation of a patient's structural brain network (90 nodes, 2309 edges) with 12-dimensional latent features per node/edge derived from multi-modal MRI (T1, T1c, T2, FLAIR).
**Output**: Binary label: IDH mutant or IDH wild-type.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def score(predictions, gold):
correct = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold) if p == g)
return correct / len(gold)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Autoencoder features are extracted using a model trained on the same 80% training split, potentially introducing data leakage or overfitting to the training cohort.
- Class imbalance (103 mutant vs 269 wild-type) is addressed via weighted loss rather than resampling, which may bias the model toward the majority class if weights are not carefully tuned.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> This study included the pre-operative multi-modal MRI (pre-contrast T1, post-contrast T1, T2, and FLAIR) of 389 glioma patients. MRI images of 274 patients were downloaded from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) website, whereas 115 patients were available from an in-house cohort. 17 of 389 patients who have missing IDH mutation status or incomplete MRI modalities were excluded. For the included patients, 103 patients are IDH mutant, and 269 are IDH wild-type.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{wei2021idhmutation,
title={Predicting isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation status in glioma using structural brain networks and graph neural networks},
author={Wei et al. (2021)},
year={2021},
note={arXiv:2109.01854}
}
```
- arXiv: 2109.01854

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!