Evaluates multimodal drug-target interaction prediction and zero-shot retrieval capabilities across multiple benchmark datasets and cold-start scenarios. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Activation, Yamanishi_08, Hetionet, Inhibition, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AUPR.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill gram-dti-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Gram Dti Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-gram-dti-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: gram-dti-eval
description: Evaluates multimodal drug-target interaction prediction and zero-shot retrieval capabilities across multiple benchmark datasets and cold-start scenarios. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Activation, Yamanishi_08, Hetionet, Inhibition, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports AUPR.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2509.21971
bibtex_key: jiang2025gramdti
confidence: high
---
# gram-dti-eval
> GRAM-DTI: adaptive multimodal representation learning for drug target interaction prediction — Feng Jiang et al. (2025) (arXiv:2509.21971, 2025)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates multimodal drug-target interaction prediction and zero-shot retrieval capabilities across multiple benchmark datasets and cold-start scenarios.
## Datasets
- **Activation** — total 1913; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
- **Yamanishi_08** — total 5127; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
- **Hetionet** — total 49942; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
- **Inhibition** — total 21055; splits: train (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `AUPR` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Area Under the Precision-Recall Curve. Computed by integrating precision over recall thresholds across all predicted probabilities.
- `AUROC` — range: [0, 1]
- Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve. Computed by integrating the true positive rate over the false positive rate across all classification thresholds.
- `Recall@K` — range: [0, 1]
- Proportion of relevant items retrieved within the top-K results. Calculated as the number of true positives in the top-K ranked candidates divided by the total number of true positives.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Multimodal representations of drug-target pairs: SMILES strings, text descriptions, HTA annotations, and protein sequences. For retrieval, single drug or protein queries.
**Output**: Binary interaction probability for DTI/MoA tasks; ranked candidate lists for retrieval tasks.
## Scoring recipe
```python
# DTI/MoA Prediction
preds = model.predict(pair)
auprc = average_precision_score(y_true, preds)
auroc = roc_auc_score(y_true, preds)
# Zero-shot Retrieval
scores = cosine_similarity(query_emb, candidate_embs)
top_k_indices = argsort(scores, descending=True)[:K]
recall_at_k = sum(1 for idx in top_k_indices if y_true[idx]) / len(y_true)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Negative samples are generated at a 1:10 ratio with positives, which differs from standard balanced or 1:1 sampling protocols.
- Cold-start splits enforce strict entity-level separation (drug or protein) to prevent data leakage, requiring careful fold construction.
- Cross-validation fold counts differ by task: 10-fold for DTI datasets and 5-fold for MoA datasets.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The performance is measured using standard metrics, including Recall@K (R@1, R@10, R@100), which indicate the proportion of relevant items retrieved within the top-K results.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{jiang2025gramdti,
title={GRAM-DTI: adaptive multimodal representation learning for drug target interaction prediction},
author={Feng Jiang et al. (2025)},
year={2025},
note={arXiv:2509.21971}
}
```
- arXiv: 2509.21971
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!