Evaluates multimodal fusion models for robust brain tumor typing by integrating MRI, histopathology, and diagnostic text under variable modality availability conditions. The benchmark probes a model's ability to perform fine-grained hierarchical classification across six glioma subtypes when some modalities are missing or degraded. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CoRe-BT, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill corebt-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Corebt Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-corebt-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: corebt-eval
description: Evaluates multimodal fusion models for robust brain tumor typing by integrating MRI, histopathology, and diagnostic text under variable modality availability conditions. The benchmark probes a model's ability to perform fine-grained hierarchical classification across six glioma subtypes when some modalities are missing or degraded. Use when the user wants to benchmark on CoRe-BT, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2603.03618
bibtex_key: herasrivera2026corebt
confidence: medium
---
# corebt-eval
> CoRe-BT: A Multimodal Radiology-Pathology-Text Benchmark for Robust Brain Tumor Typing — Heras Rivera et al. (2026) (arXiv:2603.03618, 2026)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates multimodal fusion models for robust brain tumor typing by integrating MRI, histopathology, and diagnostic text under variable modality availability conditions. The benchmark probes a model's ability to perform fine-grained hierarchical classification across six glioma subtypes when some modalities are missing or degraded.
## Datasets
- **CoRe-BT** — total 310; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- Standard classification accuracy measuring the proportion of correctly predicted glioma subtypes out of total patients. Exact metric variant (e.g., macro-F1) is not specified in the provided text.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Per patient: 3D MRI volumes, whole-slide histopathology images (processed into 256x256 tiles), and diagnostic text.
**Output**: Hierarchical tumor classification label across six glioma subtypes.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_accuracy(predictions, gold_labels):
correct = sum(1 for p, g in zip(predictions, gold_labels) if p == g)
return correct / len(gold_labels)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Missing-modality robustness is a core evaluation condition, but specific missingness protocols, randomization seeds, or split configurations are not detailed in the provided text.
- Hierarchical labeling implies multi-level classification, but the exact evaluation hierarchy and how subtypes are mapped to labels are not specified.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The dataset includes 310 patients with expert-annotated tumor masks and pathologist-validated hierarchical labels across six glioma subtypes, enabling evaluation of multimodal fusion under missing-modality conditions. Baseline experiments demonstrate that multimodal models outperform MRI-only baselines, especially in distinguishing rare glioma subtypes.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{herasrivera2026corebt,
title={CoRe-BT: A Multimodal Radiology-Pathology-Text Benchmark for Robust Brain Tumor Typing},
author={Heras Rivera et al. (2026)},
year={2026},
note={arXiv:2603.03618}
}
```
- arXiv: 2603.03618
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!