Skip to content
Back to skills

Calibration Error Estimation

ASecurity

Evaluates the sample complexity and verification cost required to estimate calibration error in AI models under rare-error regimes. It probes whether passive querying or active querying can reliably detect miscalibration and how estimation error scales with sample size and model smoothness. Use when the user has predictions and gold and needs to compute estimation error.

  • 3 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 1 view
  • Added September 11, 2026
researchpythongo

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 11, 2026

npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill calibration-error-estimation --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Calibration Error Estimation?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Calibration Error Estimation
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/qhjqhj00-calibration-error-estimation/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-calibration-error-estimation)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: calibration-error-estimation
description: Evaluates the sample complexity and verification cost required to estimate calibration error in AI models under rare-error regimes. It probes whether passive querying or active querying can reliably detect miscalibration and how estimation error scales with sample size and model smoothness. Use when the user has predictions and gold and needs to compute estimation error.
metadata:
  skill_kind: metric
  source_arxiv: 2604.12951
  bibtex_key: [REDACTED]
  confidence: medium
---

# calibration-error-estimation

> The Verification Tax: Fundamental Limits of AI Auditing in the Rare-Error Regime — Jason Z Wang (arXiv:2604.12951, 2026)

## What this evaluates

Evaluates the sample complexity and verification cost required to estimate calibration error in AI models under rare-error regimes. It probes whether passive querying or active querying can reliably detect miscalibration and how estimation error scales with sample size and model smoothness.

## Datasets

- **Synthetic Calibration Gap** — total ?; splits: test (-1)

## Metrics

- `estimation error` **(primary)** — range: other
  - Absolute difference between the true calibration gap Δ(p) = A sin(2πkp) and the estimated gap, averaged over the probability space.

## Input / output format

**Input**: Probability scores p sampled from Beta((1-ε)/ε, 1) and binary labels Y ~ Bern(p + Δ(p)).

**Output**: Estimated calibration gap or verification query decisions.

## Scoring recipe

```python
def compute_estimation_error(true_gap, estimated_gap):
    return abs(true_gap - estimated_gap)

# true_gap = A * sin(2 * pi * k * p)
# estimated_gap derived from passive/active querying on m samples
```

## Common pitfalls

- Assuming self-evaluation without ground truth yields significant information.
- Overlooking the phase transition at m·ε ≈ 1 where miscalibration becomes fundamentally undetectable.

## Evidence (verbatim from paper)

> Figure 12: Synthetic slope study: estimation error versus sample size for increasing numbers of zero-crossings.

## Citation

```bibtex
@misc{wang2026verificationtax,
  title={The Verification Tax: Fundamental Limits of AI Auditing in the Rare-Error Regime},
  author={Jason Z Wang},
  year={2026},
  note={arXiv:2604.12951}
}
```

- arXiv: 2604.12951

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.