Evaluates a model's ability to perform unsupervised domain adaptation for brain tumor segmentation, specifically transferring segmentation capabilities from T1-weighted MRI scans to T2-weighted MRI scans without target labels. Use when the user wants to benchmark on BraTS'19, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports DSC.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill brats-t1t2-seg-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Brats T1t2 Seg Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-brats-t1t2-seg-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: brats-t1t2-seg-eval
description: Evaluates a model's ability to perform unsupervised domain adaptation for brain tumor segmentation, specifically transferring segmentation capabilities from T1-weighted MRI scans to T2-weighted MRI scans without target labels. Use when the user wants to benchmark on BraTS'19, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports DSC.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2105.07715
bibtex_key: he2021crossmodality
confidence: high
---
# brats-t1t2-seg-eval
> Cross-Modality Brain Tumor Segmentation via Bidirectional Global-to-Local Unsupervised Domain Adaptation — He et al. (2021) (arXiv:2105.07715, 2021)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates a model's ability to perform unsupervised domain adaptation for brain tumor segmentation, specifically transferring segmentation capabilities from T1-weighted MRI scans to T2-weighted MRI scans without target labels.
## Datasets
- **BraTS'19** — total ?; splits: test (-1)
## Metrics
- `DSC` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Dice Similarity Coefficient. Computed per class (WT, TC, ET) as 2|P∩G|/(|P|+|G|), then averaged across classes. Reported as a percentage.
- `HD95` — range: mm
- 95th percentile of the Hausdorff Distance between predicted and ground-truth segmentation boundaries. Measured in millimeters to reduce sensitivity to outliers.
## Input / output format
**Input**: 3D MRI volume (T1-weighted for source domain, T2-weighted for target domain).
**Output**: 3D segmentation mask with three classes: Whole Tumor (WT), Tumor Core (TC), Enhancing Tumor (ET).
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_dsc(pred, gt):
intersection = np.sum(pred * gt)
return 2.0 * intersection / (np.sum(pred) + np.sum(gt))
def compute_hd95(pred, gt, spacing=1.0):
from scipy.ndimage import distance_transform_edt
dist_pred = distance_transform_edt(1 - pred) * spacing
dist_gt = distance_transform_edt(1 - gt) * spacing
boundary_dists = np.concatenate([dist_pred[pred==1], dist_gt[gt==1]])
return np.percentile(boundary_dists, 95)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Metrics are computed separately for three tumor sub-regions (WT, TC, ET) before averaging.
- HD95 uses the 95th percentile to mitigate extreme boundary errors common in medical segmentation.
- Evaluation assumes no target-domain labels are used during training (unsupervised domain adaptation).
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> TABLE I: Comparison our model with the state-of-the-art methods in DSC (%) for the task of T1 to T2. The best results are highlighted in bold. TABLE II: Performance comparison with the state-of-the-art methods in HD95 (mm) for the task of T1 to T2.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{he2021crossmodality,
title={Cross-Modality Brain Tumor Segmentation via Bidirectional Global-to-Local Unsupervised Domain Adaptation},
author={He et al. (2021)},
year={2021},
note={arXiv:2105.07715}
}
```
- arXiv: 2105.07715
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!