Volumetric segmentation of pediatric brain gliomas using multi-institutional MRI data. It probes a model's ability to accurately delineate tumor sub-regions (enhancing tumor, peritumoral edema, necrotic/cystic core) in 3D MRI scans. Use when the user wants to benchmark on BraTS-PEDs 2023, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Dice Score.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill brats-peds-2023-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Brats Peds 2023 Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-brats-peds-2023-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: brats-peds-2023-eval
description: Volumetric segmentation of pediatric brain gliomas using multi-institutional MRI data. It probes a model's ability to accurately delineate tumor sub-regions (enhancing tumor, peritumoral edema, necrotic/cystic core) in 3D MRI scans. Use when the user wants to benchmark on BraTS-PEDs 2023, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports Dice Score.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2407.08855
bibtex_key: fathikazerooni2024bratspeds
confidence: medium
---
# brats-peds-2023-eval
> BraTS-PEDs: Results of the Multi-Consortium International Pediatric Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge 2023 — Fathi Kazerooni et al. (2024) (arXiv:2407.08855, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Volumetric segmentation of pediatric brain gliomas using multi-institutional MRI data. It probes a model's ability to accurately delineate tumor sub-regions (enhancing tumor, peritumoral edema, necrotic/cystic core) in 3D MRI scans.
## Datasets
- **BraTS-PEDs 2023** — total ?; splits: train (-1), val (-1), test (-1)
## Metrics
- `Dice Score` **(primary)** — range: [0, 1]
- 2 * |A ∩ B| / (|A| + |B|), measuring voxel-wise overlap between prediction and ground truth for each tumor sub-region.
- `Hausdorff Distance 95% (HD95)` — range: mm
- 95th percentile of the maximum surface distance between prediction and ground truth boundaries, measuring spatial boundary accuracy.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Multi-sequence 3D volumetric MRI scans (T1, T1ce, T2, FLAIR) with corresponding tumor segmentation masks.
**Output**: 3D segmentation mask predicting tumor sub-regions (enhancing tumor, peritumoral edema, necrotic/cystic core).
## Scoring recipe
```python
import numpy as np
def dice_score(pred, gt):
intersection = np.sum(pred * gt)
return 2.0 * intersection / (np.sum(pred) + np.sum(gt))
def hd95(pred, gt):
from scipy.spatial.distance import cdist
surfaces_pred = np.array(np.where(pred > 0)).T
surfaces_gt = np.array(np.where(gt > 0)).T
if len(surfaces_pred) == 0 or len(surfaces_gt) == 0:
return float('inf')
dists = cdist(surfaces_pred, surfaces_gt)
return np.percentile(dists, 95)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Confusing pediatric BraTS-PEDs with adult BraTS datasets, which have different tumor distributions and scanner protocols.
- Failing to preprocess MRI sequences (e.g., N4 bias field correction, normalization) consistently across institutions, leading to domain shift.
- Evaluating on 2D slices instead of full 3D volumes, which violates the challenge's volumetric metric requirements.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> The challenge establishes standardized evaluation metrics including the Dice Score across diverse clinical datasets, enabling reproducible, scalable volumetric analysis critical for clinical trial response assessment in pediatric neuro-oncology.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{fathikazerooni2024bratspeds,
title={BraTS-PEDs: Results of the Multi-Consortium International Pediatric Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge 2023},
author={Fathi Kazerooni et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2407.08855}
}
```
- arXiv: 2407.08855
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!