This evaluation probes a model's ability to forecast and reconstruct the dynamics of partially observed, chaotic geophysical systems. It specifically tests short-term prediction accuracy and long-term topological stability (boundedness) under both in-distribution and out-of-attractor initial conditions. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Lorenz-63, Lorenz-96, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports RMSE.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill bounded-nbeddyn-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Bounded Nbeddyn Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-bounded-nbeddyn-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: bounded-nbeddyn-eval
description: This evaluation probes a model's ability to forecast and reconstruct the dynamics of partially observed, chaotic geophysical systems. It specifically tests short-term prediction accuracy and long-term topological stability (boundedness) under both in-distribution and out-of-attractor initial conditions. Use when the user wants to benchmark on Lorenz-63, Lorenz-96, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports RMSE.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2202.05750
bibtex_key: ouala2022bounded
confidence: high
---
# bounded-nbeddyn-eval
> Bounded nonlinear forecasts of partially observed geophysical systems with physics-constrained deep learning — Said Ouala et al. (arXiv:2202.05750, 2022)
## What this evaluates
This evaluation probes a model's ability to forecast and reconstruct the dynamics of partially observed, chaotic geophysical systems. It specifically tests short-term prediction accuracy and long-term topological stability (boundedness) under both in-distribution and out-of-attractor initial conditions.
## Datasets
- **Lorenz-63** — total 5000; splits: train (4000), test (1000); repo https://github.com/CIA-Oceanix/Bounded-NbedDyn
- **Lorenz-96** — total 5000; splits: train (4000), test (1000); repo https://github.com/CIA-Oceanix/Bounded-NbedDyn
## Metrics
- `RMSE` **(primary)** — range: other
- Root mean square error between predicted and ground-truth state variables over the test set.
- `Largest Lyapunov Exponent` — range: other
- Computed from a long-term simulation (10,000 time steps) of the predicted trajectory to measure chaotic divergence and topological fidelity.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Sequential partial observations of the system (e.g., first variable for Lorenz-63, first 20 states for Lorenz-96) sampled at dt=0.01. Benchmarks also use delay-embedding representations of these observations.
**Output**: Forecasted state sequences for the full system (or observed subset) over future time steps, evaluated at t0+dt and t0+4dt for short-term, and up to 10,000 steps for long-term stability.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_rmse(pred, true):
return np.sqrt(np.mean((pred - true) ** 2))
def compute_lyapunov(traj, dt=0.01, steps=10000):
# Compute largest Lyapunov exponent using standard algorithm (e.g., Rosenstein)
# on the first `steps` time steps of the predicted trajectory
return lyapunov_exponent(traj[:steps], dt)
```
## Common pitfalls
- Unconstrained models often diverge to infinity when tested with initial conditions outside the training attractor, making long-term metrics undefined.
- Benchmark baselines (SR, RNN, Latent-ODE) are highly sensitive to delay-embedding hyperparameters (lag tau, dimension d_E), which must be carefully tuned via mutual information or false nearest neighbors.
- The Lyapunov exponent requires a sufficiently long simulation (10,000 steps) and is only meaningful if the trajectory remains bounded.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> We evaluate in Table 1 the short-term forecast as well as the topological structure of the simulated limit-sets (illustrated for instance through the largest Lyapunov exponent). Regarding the short-term forecast, both versions of the NbedDyn model outperform benchmarked state-of-the-art techniques in terms of root mean square error (RMSE).
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{ouala2022bounded,
title={Bounded nonlinear forecasts of partially observed geophysical systems with physics-constrained deep learning},
author={Said Ouala et al.},
year={2022},
note={arXiv:2202.05750}
}
```
- arXiv: 2202.05750
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!