Evaluates the domain-adaptive post-training of multimodal large language models on biomedical visual question answering tasks, measuring how well models generalize to specialized medical domains using both open and closed evaluation splits. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SLAKE, PathVQA, VQA-RAD, PMC-VQA, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
Scanned 9/11/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add qhjqhj00/research-skills-pool --skill biomed-vqa-eval --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Biomed Vqa Eval?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/qhjqhj00-biomed-vqa-eval)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: biomed-vqa-eval
description: Evaluates the domain-adaptive post-training of multimodal large language models on biomedical visual question answering tasks, measuring how well models generalize to specialized medical domains using both open and closed evaluation splits. Use when the user wants to benchmark on SLAKE, PathVQA, VQA-RAD, PMC-VQA, or asks about evaluating this task. Reports accuracy.
metadata:
skill_kind: dataset_eval
source_arxiv: 2411.19930
bibtex_key: cheng2024domainadaptiveposttraining
confidence: medium
---
# biomed-vqa-eval
> On Domain-Adaptive Post-Training for Multimodal Large Language Models — Cheng et al. (2024) (arXiv:2411.19930, 2024)
## What this evaluates
Evaluates the domain-adaptive post-training of multimodal large language models on biomedical visual question answering tasks, measuring how well models generalize to specialized medical domains using both open and closed evaluation splits.
## Datasets
- **SLAKE** — total ?; splits: open (-1), closed (-1)
- **PathVQA** — total ?; splits: open (-1), closed (-1)
- **VQA-RAD** — total ?; splits: open (-1), closed (-1)
- **PMC-VQA** — total ?; splits: open (-1), closed (-1)
## Metrics
- `accuracy` **(primary)** — range: percent
- Standard VQA accuracy: percentage of predicted answers that exactly match or semantically align with the ground-truth answers. Reported as percentage scores in Table 2.
## Input / output format
**Input**: Image paired with a question (instruction) in a conversational format.
**Output**: Text answer (precise or informative response) generated by the model.
## Scoring recipe
```python
def compute_accuracy(predictions, gold):
correct = 0
for pred, gold_ans in zip(predictions, gold):
if normalize(pred) in [normalize(g) for g in gold_ans]:
correct += 1
return (correct / len(predictions)) * 100
```
## Common pitfalls
- Confusing the 'open' and 'closed' evaluation splits, which have different data distributions and baseline scores.
- Failing to account for potential data contamination when using synthetic domain-adaptive training data that may overlap with test sets.
## Evidence (verbatim from paper)
> Table 2: Biomedicine Task Performance of general MLLMs and MLLMs after domain-adaptive post-training. The image-caption sources for AdaMLLM from PMC^Raw and AdaMLLM from PMC^Refined are PMC^Raw and PMC^Refined, respectively.
## Citation
```bibtex
@misc{cheng2024domainadaptiveposttraining,
title={On Domain-Adaptive Post-Training for Multimodal Large Language Models},
author={Cheng et al. (2024)},
year={2024},
note={arXiv:2411.19930}
}
```
- arXiv: 2411.19930
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!