Review a Spec Kitty work package through the runtime review surface and approve or reject with structured feedback.
Scanned 9/2/2026
Install to Claude Code
Skills Directorynpx -y skills add Priivacy-ai/spec-kitty --skill spk-run-review-wp --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Spk Run Review Wp?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/priivacy-ai-spk-run-review-wp)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: spk-run-review-wp
description: "Review a Spec Kitty work package through the runtime review surface and approve or reject with structured feedback."
---
# spk-run-review-wp
Use this skill when the user asks to review a WP, approve/reject work, or
operate the review workflow surface.
## Flow
1. Claim or select the WP from the runtime/review output.
2. Compare implementation against WP scope, spec, plan, and acceptance checks.
3. Approve only when behavior and verification satisfy the WP.
4. Reject with concrete, actionable feedback and affected files or commands.
5. Let `spk-run-implement-review` continue the loop.
## Recording the verdict
Capture the approve/reject decision through the deterministic event-log seam described in
`spk-run-verdict-capture` — the `review_result` event in `status.events.jsonl` is the sole
authority (the `review-cycle-N.md` render is non-authoritative). In practice:
`spec-kitty agent tasks move-task <WP> --to approved` to approve, or `--to planned
--review-feedback-file <f>` to reject. Never hand-edit the `.md` render to change a verdict.
## Legacy Alias
For detailed review command behavior, use `spec-kitty-runtime-review` when
available.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', ...
Ultra-compressed communication mode. Cuts token usage ~75% by speaking like caveman while keeping full technical accuracy. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra, wenyan-lite, wenyan-full, wenyan-ultra. Use when user says "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or invokes /caveman. Also auto-triggers when token efficiency is requested.
Routes multi-tool workflows through MCP servers for large datasets and pipelines. Use when Bash tool overhead is limiting throughput on data-heavy tasks.
**Complete production-ready guide for Google Gemini embeddings API** This skill provides comprehensive coverage of the `gemini-embedding-001` model for generating text embeddings, including SDK usage, REST API patterns, batch processing, RAG integration with Cloudflare Vectorize, and advanced use cases like semantic search and document clustering. ---
Interview, source-challenge, verify, save, and ADR-gate fuzzy coding requests into Codex-ready implementation specs. Use when a feature, bugfix, refactor, migration, repo-wide change, or architecture task needs user-verified requirements, source-backed decisions, durable architecture decisions, acceptance criteria, validation commands, rollout notes, saved spec/ADR files, and a Codex execution prompt. Do not use when already fully specified or when the user wants direct implementation now.
