Use when running claudikins-kernel:ship, preparing PRs, writing changelogs, deciding merge strategy, or handling CI failures — enforces GRFP-style iterative approval, code integrity validation, and human-gated merges
Scanned 8/30/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add povvo/claudikins-kernel --skill shipping-methodology --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Shipping Methodology?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/povvo-shipping-methodology)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: shipping-methodology
description: Use when running claudikins-kernel:ship, preparing PRs, writing changelogs, deciding merge strategy, or handling CI failures — enforces GRFP-style iterative approval, code integrity validation, and human-gated merges
allowed-tools:
- Read
- Grep
- Glob
- Bash
- Edit
- AskUserQuestion
- Skill
- mcp__plugin_claudikins-tool-executor_tool-executor__search_tools
- mcp__plugin_claudikins-tool-executor_tool-executor__get_tool_schema
- mcp__plugin_claudikins-tool-executor_tool-executor__execute_code
---
# Shipping Methodology
## When to use this skill
Use this skill when you need to:
- Run the `claudikins-kernel:ship` command
- Prepare commit messages and PR descriptions
- Update changelogs and documentation
- Decide merge strategy (squash vs preserve)
- Handle CI failures or merge conflicts
- Validate code integrity before shipping
## Core Philosophy
> "Ship with confidence, not hope." - Shipping philosophy
Shipping is the final gate. Apply GRFP-style iterative workflow to every stage.
### The Five Principles
1. **Gate check first** - claudikins-kernel:verify must have passed. No exceptions.
2. **Code integrity** - Ship exactly what was verified. No sneaky changes.
3. **GRFP everywhere** - Section-by-section approval at every stage.
4. **Human decides** - No auto-merging. Human approves final merge.
5. **Clean up after** - Delete branches, update docs, celebrate.
## The Five Stages
### Stage 1: Pre-Ship Review
Show what's being shipped. Human confirms ready.
| Check | What to Show |
| ------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- |
| Verification status | All phases PASS from claudikins-kernel:verify |
| Branches to merge | List all execute/task-\* branches |
| Evidence summary | Screenshots, curl responses from catastrophiser |
| Code delta | Lines added/removed, files changed |
**Checkpoint:**
```
Ready to ship?
Verified: ✓ All checks passed
Branches: 3 branches to merge
Changes: +450 / -120 lines
[Continue] [Back to Verify] [Abort]
```
### Stage 2: Commit Strategy
Draft commit message(s). Human approves.
**Decision:**
```
How should we commit?
[Squash into single commit] [Preserve commit history]
```
**Squash (recommended for features):**
- Single clean commit on main
- Clear feature boundary
- Easier to revert if needed
**Preserve (for large multi-part work):**
- Keeps granular history
- Better for debugging
- Use for multi-feature batches
**Checkpoint:**
```
Commit message:
feat(auth): Add authentication middleware
- JWT token validation
- Role-based access control
- Session management
Closes #42
[Accept] [Revise] [Back]
```
### Stage 3: Documentation (git-perfectionist)
Update README, CHANGELOG, version. GRFP-style.
**git-perfectionist uses github-readme plugin:**
1. Deep-dive on current docs
2. Identify gaps from changes
3. Pen-wielding for updates
4. Section-by-section approval
**Files to update:**
| File | What to Update |
| ------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------- |
| README.md | Features, usage, installation if changed |
| CHANGELOG.md | Add entry in Keep a Changelog format |
| package.json / Cargo.toml / pyproject.toml | Version bump if needed |
**Checkpoint:**
```
Documentation updates:
README.md:
- Added: Authentication section
- Updated: Installation (new deps)
CHANGELOG.md:
- Added: v1.2.0 entry
Version: 1.1.0 → 1.2.0 (minor)
[Accept] [Revise] [Skip]
```
### Stage 4: PR Creation
Draft PR title and body. Section-by-section approval.
**PR Title Pattern:**
```
feat(scope): Short description
```
**PR Body Structure:**
```markdown
## Summary
[2-3 bullet points of what changed]
## Changes
[Detailed breakdown]
## Testing
[How it was verified]
## Screenshots
[If applicable]
```
**Checkpoint:**
```
PR ready to create:
Title: feat(auth): Add authentication middleware
Body:
## Summary
- Added JWT token validation
- Implemented role-based access control
...
[Create PR] [Revise] [Back]
```
### Stage 5: Final Merge
CI passes. Human approves. Merge and cleanup.
**CI Status Check:**
```
CI Status: ⏳ Running...
[Wait for CI] [View logs] [Merge anyway]
```
**On CI pass:**
```
CI Status: ✓ All checks passed
Ready to merge PR #42 to main?
[Merge] [Request review first] [Cancel]
```
**After merge:**
- Delete feature branches (unless --no-delete-branch)
- Update ship-state.json
- Celebrate
**Final output:**
```
Done! Shipped to main.
PR #42 merged ✓
Branches cleaned up ✓
Version: 1.1.0 → 1.2.0
Nice work!
```
## Rationalizations to Resist
Agents under pressure find excuses. These are all violations:
| Excuse | Reality |
| ------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------ |
| "Verify passed yesterday, close enough" | Stale verification = no verification. Re-run claudikins-kernel:verify. |
| "Just a tiny fix after verify, no big deal" | Any change after verify invalidates it. Re-run claudikins-kernel:verify. |
| "CI is flaky, I'll merge anyway" | Flaky CI hides real failures. Fix or explicitly skip with caveat. |
| "It's just a typo, skip the PR" | All changes go through PR. No exceptions. |
| "Both reviewers passed, auto-merge is fine" | Human approves final merge. Always. |
| "I'll update the changelog later" | Changelog is part of shipping. Do it now. |
| "Force push is fine, it's my branch" | Never force push to protected branches. Ever. |
| "Skip docs, nobody reads them" | Docs are part of shipping. GRFP them. |
| "The gate check is too strict" | The gate exists for a reason. Pass it properly. |
**All of these mean: Follow the methodology. Shortcuts create incidents.**
## Red Flags — STOP and Reassess
If you're thinking any of these, you're about to violate the methodology:
- "Let me just push this one change..."
- "Verify is probably still valid"
- "CI will pass next time"
- "I'll do the PR properly next time"
- "Auto-merge saves time"
- "Docs can wait"
- "Force push will fix it"
- "The human already approved something similar"
**All of these mean: STOP. Gate check exists. Human decides. Follow the stages.**
## Gate Check Pattern (CRITICAL)
The ship-init.sh hook enforces the claudikins-kernel:verify gate with code integrity validation.
### Required Checks
```bash
# 1. Verify state exists
if [ ! -f "$VERIFY_STATE" ]; then
echo "ERROR: claudikins-kernel:verify has not been run"
exit 2
fi
# 2. Unlock flag is set
UNLOCK=$(jq -r '.unlock_ship // false' "$VERIFY_STATE")
if [ "$UNLOCK" != "true" ]; then
echo "ERROR: claudikins-kernel:verify did not pass or was not approved"
exit 2
fi
```
### Code Integrity (C-5, C-7)
Ensure we ship exactly what was verified:
```bash
# C-5: Commit hash validation
VERIFY_COMMIT=$(jq -r '.verified_commit_sha' "$VERIFY_STATE")
CURRENT_COMMIT=$(git rev-parse HEAD)
if [ "$VERIFY_COMMIT" != "$CURRENT_COMMIT" ]; then
echo "ERROR: Code changed since verification"
exit 2
fi
# C-7: File manifest validation
VERIFIED_MANIFEST=$(jq -r '.verified_manifest' "$VERIFY_STATE")
CURRENT_MANIFEST=$(sha256sum "$MANIFEST_FILE" | cut -d' ' -f1)
if [ "$VERIFIED_MANIFEST" != "$CURRENT_MANIFEST" ]; then
echo "ERROR: Source files changed after verification"
exit 2
fi
```
**If integrity check fails:**
```
Code has changed since verification.
Verified commit: abc123
Current commit: def456
[Re-run claudikins-kernel:verify] [Abort]
```
## Commit Message Patterns
### Feature
```
feat(scope): Short description
- Bullet point of what changed
- Another change
Closes #123
```
### Bug Fix
```
fix(scope): Short description
Root cause: What was wrong
Fix: What we did
Fixes #456
```
### Breaking Change
```
feat(scope)!: Short description
BREAKING CHANGE: What breaks and migration path
- Change 1
- Change 2
```
### Chore (no user-facing change)
```
chore(scope): Short description
- Internal refactor
- Dependency update
```
See [commit-message-patterns.md](references/commit-message-patterns.md) for full guide.
## CHANGELOG Format
Follow Keep a Changelog format:
```markdown
## [Unreleased]
## [1.2.0] - 2026-01-17
### Added
- Authentication middleware with JWT support (#42)
### Changed
- Updated error messages for clarity
### Fixed
- Token refresh race condition (#38)
## [1.1.0] - 2026-01-10
...
```
See [changelog-merge-strategy.md](references/changelog-merge-strategy.md) for merging entries.
## External Service Failures
### GitHub API Failure (E-6, E-7, E-8)
```
PR creation failed.
Error: GitHub API returned 503
Retry 1/3...
```
**Pattern:** Max 3 retries with exponential backoff.
**If persistent:**
```
GitHub API unavailable after 3 retries.
[Try again] [Save as draft PR] [Manual merge]
```
Save state with `pending_merge: true` for recovery.
### CI Failure
```
CI failed.
Failed checks:
- lint: 2 errors
- test: 1 failure
[View logs] [Fix and retry] [Skip CI] [Abort]
```
See [ci-failure-handling.md](references/ci-failure-handling.md) for recovery patterns.
## Force Push Protection (S-23)
Never force push to protected branches.
```bash
# Check if target is protected
PROTECTED_BRANCHES="main master release"
if echo "$PROTECTED_BRANCHES" | grep -q "$TARGET"; then
if [ "$FORCE" = "true" ]; then
echo "ERROR: Cannot force push to $TARGET"
exit 2
fi
fi
```
See [force-push-protection.md](references/force-push-protection.md) for safeguards.
## Breaking Change Detection (S-24)
Detect breaking changes before shipping:
| Signal | Indicates |
| -------------------------- | -------------------- |
| Removed public function | Breaking |
| Changed function signature | Breaking |
| Removed config option | Breaking |
| Changed default behaviour | Potentially breaking |
**If breaking change detected:**
```
Breaking change detected!
- Removed: authenticate() function
- Changed: login() now requires email
This requires a MAJOR version bump.
[Acknowledge and continue] [Abort]
```
See [breaking-change-detection.md](references/breaking-change-detection.md) for detection patterns.
## Anti-Patterns
**Don't do these:**
- Shipping without claudikins-kernel:verify passing
- Modifying code after verification
- Force pushing to main/master
- Auto-merging without human approval
- Skipping documentation updates
- Ignoring CI failures
- Using vague commit messages ("fix stuff")
- Forgetting to delete feature branches
## State Tracking
### ship-state.json
```json
{
"session_id": "ship-2026-01-17-1130",
"verify_session_id": "verify-2026-01-17-1100",
"target": "main",
"phases": {
"pre_ship_review": { "status": "APPROVED" },
"commit_strategy": { "status": "APPROVED", "strategy": "squash" },
"documentation": {
"status": "APPROVED",
"files_updated": ["README.md", "CHANGELOG.md"]
},
"pr_creation": { "status": "CREATED", "pr_number": 42 },
"merge": { "status": "MERGED", "sha": "abc123" }
},
"cleanup": {
"branches_deleted": ["execute/task-1-auth", "execute/task-2-routes"]
},
"shipped_at": "2026-01-17T11:46:00Z"
}
```
## References
Full documentation in this skill's references/ folder:
- [commit-message-patterns.md](references/commit-message-patterns.md) - Full commit message guide
- [grfp-checklist.md](references/grfp-checklist.md) - GRFP integration checklist
- [pr-creation-strategy.md](references/pr-creation-strategy.md) - PR body templates
- [deployment-checklist.md](references/deployment-checklist.md) - Pre-deploy checks
- [gate-failure-recovery.md](references/gate-failure-recovery.md) - Recovering from gate failures (S-19)
- [ci-failure-handling.md](references/ci-failure-handling.md) - Handling CI pipeline failures (S-20)
- [message-generation-fallback.md](references/message-generation-fallback.md) - When commit message generation fails (S-21)
- [changelog-merge-strategy.md](references/changelog-merge-strategy.md) - Merging CHANGELOG entries (S-22)
- [force-push-protection.md](references/force-push-protection.md) - Preventing accidental force pushes (S-23)
- [breaking-change-detection.md](references/breaking-change-detection.md) - Detecting breaking changes (S-24)
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!