Simulate stochastic processes (Markov chains, random walks, SDEs, MCMC) w/ convergence diagnostics, variance reduction, viz. Use → sample paths for est/predict/viz, analytical intractable, Monte Carlo needing convergence guarantees, validate analytical vs empirical, sample complex posteriors via MCMC.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add pjt222/agent-almanac --skill simulate-stochastic-process --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Simulate Stochastic Process?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pjt222-simulate-stochastic-process-7fd7318d)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: simulate-stochastic-process
locale: caveman-ultra
source_locale: en
source_commit: 82c77053
fence_basis_commit: 82c77053
translator: "Julius Brussee homage — caveman"
translation_date: "2026-05-03"
description: >
Simulate stochastic processes (Markov chains, random walks, SDEs, MCMC)
w/ convergence diagnostics, variance reduction, viz. Use → sample paths
for est/predict/viz, analytical intractable, Monte Carlo needing
convergence guarantees, validate analytical vs empirical, sample complex
posteriors via MCMC.
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob
metadata:
author: Philipp Thoss
version: "1.0"
domain: stochastic-processes
complexity: advanced
language: multi
tags: stochastic, simulation, mcmc, convergence, monte-carlo
---
# Simulate Stochastic Process
Sample paths from stochastic processes — discrete Markov, continuous-time, SDEs, MCMC samplers — w/ convergence diagnostics, variance reduction, trajectory viz.
## Use When
- Generate sample paths for est/predict/viz
- Analytical intractable, sim only feasible
- MC est needing convergence guarantees + uncertainty quant
- Validate analytical (stationary, hitting times) vs empirical
- Sample complex posterior via MCMC
- Prototype stochastic model before full analytical
## In
### Required
| Input | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| `process_type` | string | `"dtmc"`, `"ctmc"`, `"random_walk"`, `"brownian_motion"`, `"sde"`, `"mcmc"` |
| `parameters` | dict | Process-specific (transition matrix, drift/diffusion, target density) |
| `n_paths` | integer | Independent paths to sim |
| `n_steps` | integer | Time steps per path (or total MCMC iters) |
### Optional
| Input | Type | Default | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| `initial_state` | scalar/vector | process-specific | Start state | distribution |
| `dt` | float | 0.01 | Time step → continuous discretization |
| `seed` | integer | random | Reproducibility |
| `burn_in` | integer | `n_steps / 10` | Initial discard (MCMC) |
| `thinning` | integer | 1 | Keep every k-th → reduce autocorr |
| `variance_reduction` | string | `"none"` | `"none"`, `"antithetic"`, `"stratified"`, `"control_variate"` |
| `target_function` | callable | none | Eval along paths → MC est |
## Do
### Step 1: Define Process + Params
1.1. ID process type + gather params:
- **DTMC**: Transition matrix `P` + state space. Validate row-stochastic.
- **CTMC**: Rate matrix `Q`. Rows sum 0, off-diag non-neg.
- **Random walk**: Step distrib (e.g. `{-1, +1}` equal prob), boundaries.
- **Brownian**: Drift `mu`, vol `sigma`, dim `d`.
- **SDE (Ito)**: Drift `a(x,t)`, diffusion `b(x,t)`.
- **MCMC**: Target log-density, proposal (RW Metropolis, HMC, Gibbs).
1.2. Validate consistency:
- Matrix dims match state space size
- SDE coefs satisfy growth + Lipschitz (informal min) for solver
- MCMC proposal well-defined for target support
1.3. Set seed → reproducibility.
**Got:** Fully spec'd model w/ validated params + reproducible RNG state.
**If err:** Inconsistent params (e.g. non-stochastic matrix) → correct first. Pathological SDE coefs → diff discretization scheme.
### Step 2: Select Sim Method
2.1. Choose algo per type:
| Process | Method | Key Property |
|---|---|---|
| DTMC | Direct sampling from transition row | Exact |
| CTMC | Gillespie algorithm (SSA) | Exact, event-driven |
| CTMC (approx.) | Tau-leaping | Approximate, faster for high rates |
| Random walk | Direct sampling of increments | Exact |
| Brownian motion | Cumulative sum of Gaussian increments | Exact for fixed `dt` |
| SDE (general) | Euler-Maruyama | Order 0.5 strong, order 1.0 weak |
| SDE (higher order) | Milstein | Order 1.0 strong (scalar noise) |
| SDE (stiff) | Implicit Euler-Maruyama | Stable for stiff drift |
| MCMC (general) | Metropolis-Hastings | Asymptotically exact |
| MCMC (gradient) | Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) | Better mixing for high dimensions |
| MCMC (conditional) | Gibbs sampler | Exact conditionals when available |
2.2. SDE → `dt` small enough for stability. Heuristic: start `dt = 0.01`, halve until results stabilize.
2.3. MCMC → tune proposal scale → acceptance ~:
- 23.4% → high-dim RW Metropolis
- 57.4% → 1D targets
- 65-90% → HMC (depends on trajectory length)
2.4. Variance reduction config:
- **Antithetic**: Each path w/ `Z` → also sim w/ `-Z`
- **Stratified**: Partition prob space, sample within strata
- **Control variates**: Correlated quantity w/ known E → reduces var
**Got:** Algo matched to type w/ tuning params.
**If err:** Unstable (Euler-Maruyama diverging) → implicit method | reduce `dt`.
### Step 3: Implement + Run
3.1. Allocate storage `n_paths` × `n_steps` (or dynamic for event-driven Gillespie).
3.2. Per path `i = 1, ..., n_paths`:
**DTMC / Random Walk:**
- `x[0] = initial_state`
- For `t = 1..n_steps`: sample `x[t]` from transition given `x[t-1]`
**CTMC (Gillespie):**
- `x[0] = initial_state`, `time = 0`
- While `time < T_max`:
- Total rate `lambda = -Q[x, x]`
- Holding time `tau ~ Exp(lambda)`
- Next state from probs `Q[x, j] / lambda` for `j != x`
- `time += tau`, record
**SDE (Euler-Maruyama):**
- `x[0] = initial_state`
- For `t = 1..n_steps`:
- `dW = sqrt(dt) * N(0, I)` (Wiener)
- `x[t] = x[t-1] + a(x[t-1], t*dt) * dt + b(x[t-1], t*dt) * dW`
**MCMC (Metropolis-Hastings):**
- `x[0] = initial_state`
- For `t = 1..n_steps`:
- Propose `x' ~ q(x' | x[t-1])`
- `alpha = min(1, p(x') * q(x[t-1]|x') / (p(x[t-1]) * q(x'|x[t-1])))`
- Accept w/ prob `alpha`: `x[t] = x'` if accepted, else `x[t-1]`
- Record decision
3.3. `target_function` provided → eval at each state, store.
3.4. Apply thinning: keep every `thinning`-th.
3.5. Discard `burn_in` from start (MCMC).
**Got:** `n_paths` complete trajectories in mem, optional fn evals. MCMC acceptance in target range.
**If err:** NaN/Inf → reduce `dt` (SDE) | check params. MCMC accept ~0% | ~100% → adjust proposal scale.
### Step 4: Convergence Diagnostics
4.1. **Trace plots**: per-component over time, subset paths. Visual check stationarity (no trends, stable var).
4.2. **Gelman-Rubin (R-hat)** for multi-chain MCMC:
- Within-chain `W`, between-chain `B`
- `R_hat = sqrt((n-1)/n + B/(n*W))`
- `R_hat < 1.01` (strict) | `< 1.1` (lenient) → convergence
4.3. **Effective sample size (ESS)**:
- Estimate autocorr at increasing lags
- `ESS = n_samples / (1 + 2 * sum(autocorr))`
- Rule: `ESS > 400` for reliable posterior summaries
4.4. **Geweke**: cmp mean first 10% vs last 50%. Z-score in [-2, 2] → convergence.
4.5. **Non-MCMC**: time-avg stats (mean, var) stabilize as path length ↑. Plot running averages.
4.6. Summary table:
| Diagnostic | Value | Threshold | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| R-hat (max) | ... | < 1.01 | ... |
| ESS (min) | ... | > 400 | ... |
| Geweke z (max abs) | ... | < 2.0 | ... |
| Acceptance rate | ... | 0.15-0.50 | ... |
**Got:** All diagnostics pass thresholds. Trace shows stable, well-mixing chains.
**If err:** R-hat > 1.1 → run longer | improve proposal. ESS very low → ↑ thinning | better sampler (HMC). Geweke fails → extend burn-in.
### Step 5: Summary Stats + CIs
5.1. Per quantity (state occupancy, fn E, hitting times):
- Point est = sample mean across paths (post burn-in + thin)
- SE via ESS: `SE = SD / sqrt(ESS)`
5.2. Build CIs:
- Normal approx: `est +/- z_{alpha/2} * SE`
- Skewed → percentile bootstrap | batch means
5.3. Variance reduction → VRF:
- `VRF = Var(naive) / Var(reduced)`
- Report effective speedup
5.4. MC integration: report est, SE, 95% CI, ESS, # fn evals.
5.5. Distribution est:
- Empirical quantiles (median, 2.5th, 97.5th)
- KDE for continuous
5.6. Tabulate all w/ uncertainties.
**Got:** Point ests + SEs + CIs. Variance reduction (if applied) → VRF > 1.
**If err:** CIs too wide → ↑ `n_paths` | `n_steps`. Var reduction worsens (VRF < 1) → disable; control variate | antithetic mismatched.
### Step 6: Visualize
6.1. **Trajectory plots**: 5-20 paths over time. Use transparency for overlap.
6.2. **Ensemble stats**: overlay mean + pointwise 95% CI bands across paths.
6.3. **Marginal distributions**: at selected times, hist | density estimates of state across paths.
6.4. **Stationary cmp**: analytical avail → overlay on empirical hist (final time slice).
6.5. **Autocorr plots** (MCMC): ACF per component, reasonable lag.
6.6. **Diagnostic dashboard**: trace + ACF + running mean + marginal density → multi-panel.
6.7. Save figures vector (PDF/SVG) + raster (PNG) → docs.
**Got:** Pub-quality figures showing trajectory, distributional convergence, diagnostics. Analytical (where avail) matches empirical.
**If err:** Viz reveals non-stationarity | unexpected multimodality → revisit Steps 1-2 (param/method err). Cluttered plots → reduce paths shown | bigger figure.
## Check
- All trajectories in valid state space (no out-of-bounds, no NaN/Inf)
- DTMC/CTMC: empirical stationary → analytical (within MC err)
- SDE: halving `dt` doesn't qualitatively change → convergence order
- MCMC: R-hat < 1.01, ESS > 400, Geweke z in [-2, 2]
- CI widths shrink ∝ `1/sqrt(n_paths)` (CLT)
- Variance reduction → VRF > 1 (improves not worsens)
- Reproducibility: same seed → identical results
## Traps
- **Insufficient burn-in (MCMC)**: Poor initial state → long burn-in before samples represent target. Inspect trace + diagnostics, don't guess.
- **Euler-Maruyama instability (stiff SDE)**: Large drift gradients → explicit can diverge. Implicit | adaptive step.
- **Strong vs weak convergence (SDE)**: Strong = pathwise err (individual trajectories); weak = distributional (expectations). Euler-Maruyama: weak 1.0, strong 0.5.
- **PRNG quality**: Long sims → low-quality RNGs → correlated samples. Mersenne Twister | PCG | Xoshiro. Verify independence.
- **Ignore autocorr (MCMC)**: Treating autocorr samples as independent underestimates uncertainty. Use ESS, not raw count.
- **Antithetic for non-monotone fns**: Reduces var only for monotone fn of underlying uniforms. Non-monotone → can ↑ var.
- **Mem for large sims**: All time steps of many long paths → mem exhaust. Online stats (running mean, var) when full trajectories not needed for viz.
## →
- [Model Markov Chain](../model-markov-chain/SKILL.md) — transition matrices + analytical sims validate
- [Fit Hidden Markov Model](../fit-hidden-markov-model/SKILL.md) — sim from fitted HMMs → posterior predictive checking + synthetic data
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!