Fit cognitive drift-diffusion models (Ratcliff DDM) to reaction time and accuracy data with parameter estimation (drift rate, boundary separation, non-decision time), model comparison, and parameter recovery validation. Use when modeling binary decision-making with reaction time data, estimating cognitive parameters from experimental data, comparing sequential sampling model variants, or decomposing speed-accuracy tradeoff effects into latent cognitive components.
Scanned 9/3/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add pjt222/agent-almanac --skill fit-drift-diffusion-model --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Fit Drift Diffusion Model?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pjt222-fit-drift-diffusion-model-37cde84d)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: fit-drift-diffusion-model
locale: wenyan-ultra
source_locale: en
source_commit: 82c77053
translator: "Julius Brussee homage — caveman"
translation_date: "2026-04-24"
description: >
Fit cognitive drift-diffusion models (Ratcliff DDM) to reaction time and
accuracy data with parameter estimation (drift rate, boundary separation,
non-decision time), model comparison, and parameter recovery validation.
Use when modeling binary decision-making with reaction time data, estimating
cognitive parameters from experimental data, comparing sequential sampling
model variants, or decomposing speed-accuracy tradeoff effects into
latent cognitive components.
license: MIT
allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Grep Glob
metadata:
author: Philipp Thoss
version: "1.0"
domain: diffusion
complexity: advanced
language: multi
tags: diffusion, ddm, drift-diffusion, cognitive, reaction-time, estimation
---
# 擬 DDM
自反應時與正確率估 DDM 參、以分位估擬、較候變、以參復模擬驗估質。
## 用
- 以反應時模二擇決
- 自實數估認參(漂率、界隔、非決時)
- 較決任之序抽模變
- 驗 DDM 擬管復已知參值
- 解速正權衡為潛認素
## 入
- **必**:含各試之正/誤標之反應時數
- **必**:各試之受者與條件識
- **必**:DDM 變擇(基 3 參、全 7 參、或層)
- **可**:貝葉估之先(默:弱告)
- **可**:參復之模數(默:100)
- **可**:RT 濾界秒(默:0.1 至 5.0)
## 行
### 一:備反應時數
清並格原行數以擬 DDM。
1. 載數並察受 ID、條件、RT、正確欄:
```python
import pandas as pd
data = pd.read_csv("behavioral_data.csv")
required_columns = ["subject_id", "condition", "rt", "accuracy"]
assert all(col in data.columns for col in required_columns), \
f"Missing columns: {set(required_columns) - set(data.columns)}"
```
2. 以可設界濾離群 RT:
```python
rt_lower = 0.1 # seconds
rt_upper = 5.0 # seconds
n_before = len(data)
data = data[(data["rt"] >= rt_lower) & (data["rt"] <= rt_upper)]
n_removed = n_before - len(data)
print(f"Removed {n_removed} trials ({100*n_removed/n_before:.1f}%) outside [{rt_lower}, {rt_upper}]s")
```
3. 各受與條件計摘統:
```python
summary = data.groupby(["subject_id", "condition"]).agg(
n_trials=("rt", "count"),
mean_rt=("rt", "mean"),
accuracy=("accuracy", "mean")
).reset_index()
print(summary.describe())
```
4. 驗最少試數(DDM 需足數於各格):
```python
min_trials = summary["n_trials"].min()
assert min_trials >= 40, f"Minimum trials per cell is {min_trials}; need at least 40 for stable estimation"
```
得:已清數文無 RT 離群,各受-條件格至少 40 試,正確率於 0.50 與 0.99 間。
敗:試過少→考合條件或去缺數過者。正確頂(>0.99)或底(<0.55)→DDM 或不可識;察任難。
### 二:擇 DDM 變
依研問擇模繁。
1. 定候模變:
```python
model_variants = {
"basic": {
"params": ["v", "a", "t"],
"description": "Drift rate, boundary separation, non-decision time",
"free_params": 3
},
"full": {
"params": ["v", "a", "t", "z", "sv", "sz", "st"],
"description": "Basic + starting point bias, cross-trial variability",
"free_params": 7
},
"hddm": {
"params": ["v", "a", "t", "z"],
"description": "Hierarchical with group-level and subject-level parameters",
"free_params": "4 per subject + 8 group-level"
}
}
```
2. 依數性擇:
| Criterion | Basic (3-param) | Full (7-param) | Hierarchical |
|---|---|---|---|
| Trials per cell | 40-100 | 200+ | 40+ (pooled) |
| Subjects | Any | Any | 10+ |
| Research goal | Group effects | Individual fits | Both levels |
| Error RT shape | Symmetric | Asymmetric | Either |
3. 設所擇變:
```python
selected_variant = "basic" # adjust based on criteria above
model_config = model_variants[selected_variant]
print(f"Selected: {selected_variant} ({model_config['free_params']} free parameters)")
print(f"Parameters: {', '.join(model_config['params'])}")
```
得:變已擇並有依試數、受數、研問之理。
敗:變間不確→自基始,唯殘診示系誤擬(如誤 RT 分不匹)時加繁。
### 三:估參
以極似或貝葉擬 DDM。
1. MLE 擬用 `fast-dm` 或 Python `pyddm`:
```python
import pyddm
model = pyddm.Model(
drift=pyddm.DriftConstant(drift=pyddm.Fittable(minval=0, maxval=5)),
bound=pyddm.BoundConstant(B=pyddm.Fittable(minval=0.3, maxval=3.0)),
nondecision=pyddm.NonDecisionConstant(t=pyddm.Fittable(minval=0.1, maxval=0.5)),
overlay=pyddm.OverlayNonDecision(nondectime=pyddm.Fittable(minval=0.1, maxval=0.5)),
T_dur=5.0,
dt=0.001,
dx=0.001
)
```
2. 貝葉估用 HDDM:
```python
import hddm
hddm_model = hddm.HDDM(data, depends_on={"v": "condition"})
hddm_model.find_starting_values()
hddm_model.sample(5000, burn=1000, thin=2, dbname="traces.db", db="pickle")
```
3. 取並存估參:
```python
params = hddm_model.get_group_estimates()
print("Group-level parameter estimates:")
for param_name, stats in params.items():
print(f" {param_name}: {stats['mean']:.3f} [{stats['2.5q']:.3f}, {stats['97.5q']:.3f}]")
```
4. 察收斂(僅貝葉):
```python
from kabuki.analyze import gelman_rubin
convergence = gelman_rubin(hddm_model)
max_rhat = max(convergence.values())
print(f"Max Gelman-Rubin R-hat: {max_rhat:.3f}")
assert max_rhat < 1.1, f"Chains have not converged (R-hat = {max_rhat:.3f})"
```
得:參估含標誤或信區。貝葉:諸參 Gelman-Rubin R-hat < 1.1。漂率常 0.5-4.0、界 0.5-2.5、非決時 0.15-0.50s。
敗:估不收→試:(a) 緊參界,(b) 經網搜佳始值,(c) 長鏈多燒。MLE 碰界值→模或誤設。
### 四:估擬
以分位診較預測與察 RT 分。
1. 自擬模生預 RT 分位:
```python
import numpy as np
quantiles = [0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9]
predicted_rts = model.simulate(n_trials=10000)
pred_quantiles = np.quantile(predicted_rts[predicted_rts > 0], quantiles) # correct
pred_quantiles_err = np.quantile(np.abs(predicted_rts[predicted_rts < 0]), quantiles) # error
```
2. 算察 RT 分位:
```python
obs_correct = data[data["accuracy"] == 1]["rt"]
obs_error = data[data["accuracy"] == 0]["rt"]
obs_quantiles = np.quantile(obs_correct, quantiles)
obs_quantiles_err = np.quantile(obs_error, quantiles) if len(obs_error) > 10 else None
```
3. 造分位-概圖(QP 圖):
```python
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
fig, ax = plt.subplots(1, 1, figsize=(8, 6))
ax.scatter(obs_quantiles, quantiles, marker="o", label="Observed (correct)")
ax.scatter(pred_quantiles, quantiles, marker="x", label="Predicted (correct)")
if obs_quantiles_err is not None:
ax.scatter(obs_quantiles_err, quantiles, marker="o", facecolors="none", label="Observed (error)")
ax.scatter(pred_quantiles_err, quantiles, marker="x", label="Predicted (error)")
ax.set_xlabel("RT (s)")
ax.set_ylabel("Quantile")
ax.legend()
ax.set_title("Quantile-Probability Plot")
fig.savefig("qp_plot.png", dpi=150)
```
4. 算擬統(分位箱 chi 方):
```python
from scipy.stats import chisquare
observed_proportions = np.diff(np.concatenate([[0], quantiles, [1]]))
predicted_proportions = np.diff(np.concatenate([[0], quantiles, [1]]))
chi2, p_value = chisquare(observed_proportions, predicted_proportions)
print(f"Chi-square fit: chi2={chi2:.3f}, p={p_value:.3f}")
```
得:QP 圖示預分位近察分位於正與誤 RT。chi 方試非顯(p > 0.05),擬足。
敗:模系漏快或慢分位→考加跨試變參(sv、st)。誤 RT 形誤→加起變(sz)。以擴模重擬。
### 五:較模
以信準於候 DDM 變間擇。
1. 擬各候模並集擬統:
```python
model_results = {}
for variant_name in ["basic", "full"]:
fitted_model = fit_ddm(data, variant=variant_name)
model_results[variant_name] = {
"log_likelihood": fitted_model.log_likelihood,
"n_params": fitted_model.n_free_params,
"bic": fitted_model.bic,
"aic": fitted_model.aic
}
```
2. 算並較 BIC 值:
```python
print("Model Comparison (BIC):")
print(f"{'Model':<15} {'LL':>10} {'k':>5} {'BIC':>12} {'delta_BIC':>12}")
print("-" * 55)
best_bic = min(r["bic"] for r in model_results.values())
for name, result in sorted(model_results.items(), key=lambda x: x[1]["bic"]):
delta = result["bic"] - best_bic
print(f"{name:<15} {result['log_likelihood']:>10.1f} {result['n_params']:>5} "
f"{result['bic']:>12.1f} {delta:>12.1f}")
```
3. 以標引釋 BIC 差:
BIC difference interpretation (Kass & Raftery, 1995):
- 0-2: Not worth mentioning
- 2-6: Positive evidence
- 6-10: Strong evidence
- `>10`: Very strong evidence
4. 貝葉模用 DIC 或 WAIC:
```python
dic = hddm_model.dic
print(f"DIC: {dic:.1f}")
```
得:模間明勝者 BIC 差 > 6,或差 < 2 時有理留簡模之決。
敗:模不可分(BIC 差 < 2)→偏簡模(省)。全模以大邊勝→確基模非因數議誤設。
### 六:以參復模擬驗
驗估管自模擬數復已知參值。
1. 定真參網:
```python
true_params = {
"v": [0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0],
"a": [0.6, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0],
"t": [0.2, 0.3, 0.4]
}
```
2. 各合模擬數並重估:
```python
from itertools import product
recovery_results = []
n_simulated_trials = 500 # match empirical trial count
for v_true, a_true, t_true in product(true_params["v"], true_params["a"], true_params["t"]):
simulated_data = simulate_ddm(v=v_true, a=a_true, t=t_true, n=n_simulated_trials)
fitted = fit_ddm(simulated_data, variant="basic")
recovery_results.append({
"v_true": v_true, "v_est": fitted.params["v"],
"a_true": a_true, "a_est": fitted.params["a"],
"t_true": t_true, "t_est": fitted.params["t"]
})
```
3. 算復統:
```python
recovery_df = pd.DataFrame(recovery_results)
for param in ["v", "a", "t"]:
correlation = recovery_df[f"{param}_true"].corr(recovery_df[f"{param}_est"])
bias = (recovery_df[f"{param}_est"] - recovery_df[f"{param}_true"]).mean()
rmse = np.sqrt(((recovery_df[f"{param}_est"] - recovery_df[f"{param}_true"])**2).mean())
print(f"{param}: r={correlation:.3f}, bias={bias:.4f}, RMSE={rmse:.4f}")
```
4. 生復散圖:
```python
fig, axes = plt.subplots(1, 3, figsize=(15, 5))
for idx, param in enumerate(["v", "a", "t"]):
ax = axes[idx]
ax.scatter(recovery_df[f"{param}_true"], recovery_df[f"{param}_est"], alpha=0.5)
lims = [recovery_df[f"{param}_true"].min(), recovery_df[f"{param}_true"].max()]
ax.plot(lims, lims, "k--", label="Identity")
ax.set_xlabel(f"True {param}")
ax.set_ylabel(f"Estimated {param}")
ax.set_title(f"Recovery: {param} (r={recovery_df[f'{param}_true'].corr(recovery_df[f'{param}_est']):.3f})")
ax.legend()
fig.tight_layout()
fig.savefig("parameter_recovery.png", dpi=150)
```
得:諸參復相關 r > 0.85、偏近零(參域 < 5%)、RMSE 於用可接域。
敗:某參低復常意:(a) 試不足——增 n_simulated_trials;(b) 參權衡——漂與界可權衡;固一以試可復性;(c) 似然面平——考再參化或貝葉估以告先。
## 驗
- [ ] 入數含正類 RT 與正確欄
- [ ] 離群濾去 <10% 試
- [ ] 各受-條件格至少 40 試
- [ ] 參估於理域(v: 0-5、a: 0.3-3.0、t: 0.1-0.6)
- [ ] 收斷過(貝葉 R-hat < 1.1、MLE 梯近零)
- [ ] QP 圖示預分位距察分位 50ms 內
- [ ] 模較生明排或有理簡決
- [ ] 諸自參復相關逾 r = 0.85
- [ ] 復偏 <5% 參域
## 忌
- **試不足**:DDM 估飢數。<40 試/格致估不穩、復劣。擬前必驗試數
- **忽誤 RT**:DDM 聯模正與誤 RT 分。棄誤試失界與起之信
- **不濾速猜**:<100ms RT 或為污(預應)。含則歪非決時估
- **混 DDM 變**:基模設無跨試變。若誤 RT 系快於正→需全模含 sv 與 sz 參
- **全模過擬**:7 參 DDM 可於稀數過擬。DDM 模擇用 BIC(罰繁)非 AIC
- **略參復**:無復驗不能別估偏與真實驗效。釋條件差前必行復
## 參
- `analyze-diffusion-dynamics` - DDM 下擴散程之數析
- `implement-diffusion-network` - 共前向程框之生擴散模
- `design-experiment` - 集 DDM 質數之實驗設
- `write-testthat-tests` - 於 R 試參估管
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!