Skip to content
Back to skills

Funding Pathway Design

ASecurity

Build a funding strategy that combines non-dilutive and dilutive funding in the right order, and manage runway.

  • 2 stars
  • 0 votes
  • 0 copies
  • 0 views
  • Added September 6, 2026
ai-agentsgorailsapi

Works with

  • api

Security analysis

A100/100

Scanned September 6, 2026

npx -y skills add Pilot2Service/AI-Business-Designer --skill funding-pathway-design --agent claude-code

Installs into .claude/skills of the current project.

Are you the author of Funding Pathway Design?

Add the live security badge to your README. It updates with every re-scan.

Security grade badge for Funding Pathway Design
[![Security: A — Skills Directory](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/api/skills/pilot2service-funding-pathway-design/badge)](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pilot2service-funding-pathway-design)

More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page. Keep it an A: scan every change in CI with Pro.

Download with Pro
SKILL.md
---
name: funding-pathway-design
description: "Build a funding strategy that combines non-dilutive and dilutive funding in the right order, and manage runway."
---

# Funding Pathway Design

## Purpose

Build a funding strategy that combines non-dilutive and dilutive funding in
the right order, and manage runway.

## Based on

the owner's published commercialisation guide (owner, 2025). Chapter "How
Spin-outs Are Funded?" (pp. 34-45) — the handbook's longest chapter.

- EIC Accelerator, EIC Pathfinder/Transition, SBIR/STTR (USA), Eurostars,
  national PoC funds
- EIC Impact Report 2025: over €1bn invested in 272 companies, over €3 of
  private capital mobilised per €1 of EIC funding
- University venture funds (e.g. Oxford Science Enterprises, Stanford's
  StartX)
- Tax incentives: UK EIS/SEIS, France JEI

## Method

1. Map non-dilutive sources first: proof-of-concept funds (your own
   organisation, NSF I-Corps, Innovate UK, ERC PoC, EIC Pathfinder/Transition),
   national commercialisation programmes (NSERC I2I, CRCP, etc.).
2. Map larger public programmes for the scale-up stage: EIC Accelerator
   (grant + equity, up to €2.5M grant + €15M equity), SBIR/STTR phases,
   regional equivalents.
3. Once technical/commercial proof exists, move to dilutive funding: angel
   investors → the university's own venture fund (if one exists) → VC
   (Series A, B...).
4. Choose investors carefully: look for a track record in your sector/deep
   tech; be wary of inexperienced investors who can stall a deal with
   non-standard terms.
5. Consider international and specialised funding sources (impact investors,
   foundations) if the innovation has a social or environmental dimension.
6. Note tax incentives (e.g. UK EIS/SEIS, France JEI) — they lower the
   investor's risk and make it easier to raise money.
7. Manage runway deliberately: track burn rate, start the next round in time,
   spend money on value-creating things (validated IP, prototypes, approvals,
   customer traction) — not on offices or other non-critical costs.
8. Build the funding pathway in stages, for example: v0 seed money for a
   prototype → v1 incorporation + PoC grant + angel → v2 EIC/SBIR-phase
   funding → v3 Series A on the back of proven progress.
9. Build relationships with funders and investors BEFORE you need money —
   early engagement significantly strengthens an application/pitch.

## Gotchas

- The non-dilutive-before-dilutive ordering (steps 1-3) is a sequencing
  principle, not optional colour — approaching angels or VCs before
  exhausting proof-of-concept/non-dilutive sources dilutes equity earlier
  than necessary for validation work grants could have funded instead.
- Step 3's move to dilutive funding is gated on "once technical/commercial
  proof exists" — pitching investors before that proof exists is a common
  way applications get rejected or come back with worse terms.
- Runway management (step 7) explicitly names spending on offices or other
  non-critical costs as the failure mode to avoid — a well-funded round
  can still fail the "spend on value-creating things" test if burn goes to
  overhead instead of IP, prototypes, approvals, or customer traction.
- Investor selection isn't just about check size: step 4 warns that an
  inexperienced investor (no track record in the sector/deep tech) can
  stall a deal with non-standard terms — track record matters as much as
  the amount offered.
- Figures like the EIC Accelerator's "up to €2.5M grant + €15M equity" are
  the programme's terms at time of writing, not guaranteed constants — this
  skill explicitly does not guarantee current programme availability or
  terms (see "What this skill does NOT do"), so verify directly with the
  funder before relying on a specific number.

## What this skill does NOT do

- Does not calculate a precise ROI/NPV model for you — see
  `business-case-and-analysis:roi-npv-sensitivity-model`.
- Does not give investment advice.
- Does not guarantee the availability or terms of a specific funding
  programme — programmes change, check current details directly with the
  funder.

## Continue from here

- Next in this pack: `../commercialisation-journey-roadmap/SKILL.md` —
  Structure the entire commercialisation journey into five stages and build
  an actionable roadmap that ties stage gates to agile iteration.
- Related skill in another pack:
  `../../../../business-case-and-analysis/skills/roi-npv-sensitivity-model/SKILL.md`
- Pack's shared guardrails: `../../CLAUDE.md`
- Overview of the full journey: `../commercialisation-journey-roadmap/SKILL.md`

## References

- `../../references/case-studies.md` — 7 spin-out examples from different
  industries and regions
- `../../references/terminology.md` — the handbook's glossary
- `../../references/sources.md` — the handbook's own source references
- `../../CLAUDE.md` — the pack's shared guardrails

Attribution

Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.

Comments

Loading comments…

Newsletter

Get the weekly list of safe new skills, and the ones we pulled.