Build a funding strategy that combines non-dilutive and dilutive funding in the right order, and manage runway.
Scanned 9/6/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add Pilot2Service/AI-Business-Designer --skill funding-pathway-design --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Funding Pathway Design?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/pilot2service-funding-pathway-design)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: funding-pathway-design
description: "Build a funding strategy that combines non-dilutive and dilutive funding in the right order, and manage runway."
---
# Funding Pathway Design
## Purpose
Build a funding strategy that combines non-dilutive and dilutive funding in
the right order, and manage runway.
## Based on
the owner's published commercialisation guide (owner, 2025). Chapter "How
Spin-outs Are Funded?" (pp. 34-45) — the handbook's longest chapter.
- EIC Accelerator, EIC Pathfinder/Transition, SBIR/STTR (USA), Eurostars,
national PoC funds
- EIC Impact Report 2025: over €1bn invested in 272 companies, over €3 of
private capital mobilised per €1 of EIC funding
- University venture funds (e.g. Oxford Science Enterprises, Stanford's
StartX)
- Tax incentives: UK EIS/SEIS, France JEI
## Method
1. Map non-dilutive sources first: proof-of-concept funds (your own
organisation, NSF I-Corps, Innovate UK, ERC PoC, EIC Pathfinder/Transition),
national commercialisation programmes (NSERC I2I, CRCP, etc.).
2. Map larger public programmes for the scale-up stage: EIC Accelerator
(grant + equity, up to €2.5M grant + €15M equity), SBIR/STTR phases,
regional equivalents.
3. Once technical/commercial proof exists, move to dilutive funding: angel
investors → the university's own venture fund (if one exists) → VC
(Series A, B...).
4. Choose investors carefully: look for a track record in your sector/deep
tech; be wary of inexperienced investors who can stall a deal with
non-standard terms.
5. Consider international and specialised funding sources (impact investors,
foundations) if the innovation has a social or environmental dimension.
6. Note tax incentives (e.g. UK EIS/SEIS, France JEI) — they lower the
investor's risk and make it easier to raise money.
7. Manage runway deliberately: track burn rate, start the next round in time,
spend money on value-creating things (validated IP, prototypes, approvals,
customer traction) — not on offices or other non-critical costs.
8. Build the funding pathway in stages, for example: v0 seed money for a
prototype → v1 incorporation + PoC grant + angel → v2 EIC/SBIR-phase
funding → v3 Series A on the back of proven progress.
9. Build relationships with funders and investors BEFORE you need money —
early engagement significantly strengthens an application/pitch.
## Gotchas
- The non-dilutive-before-dilutive ordering (steps 1-3) is a sequencing
principle, not optional colour — approaching angels or VCs before
exhausting proof-of-concept/non-dilutive sources dilutes equity earlier
than necessary for validation work grants could have funded instead.
- Step 3's move to dilutive funding is gated on "once technical/commercial
proof exists" — pitching investors before that proof exists is a common
way applications get rejected or come back with worse terms.
- Runway management (step 7) explicitly names spending on offices or other
non-critical costs as the failure mode to avoid — a well-funded round
can still fail the "spend on value-creating things" test if burn goes to
overhead instead of IP, prototypes, approvals, or customer traction.
- Investor selection isn't just about check size: step 4 warns that an
inexperienced investor (no track record in the sector/deep tech) can
stall a deal with non-standard terms — track record matters as much as
the amount offered.
- Figures like the EIC Accelerator's "up to €2.5M grant + €15M equity" are
the programme's terms at time of writing, not guaranteed constants — this
skill explicitly does not guarantee current programme availability or
terms (see "What this skill does NOT do"), so verify directly with the
funder before relying on a specific number.
## What this skill does NOT do
- Does not calculate a precise ROI/NPV model for you — see
`business-case-and-analysis:roi-npv-sensitivity-model`.
- Does not give investment advice.
- Does not guarantee the availability or terms of a specific funding
programme — programmes change, check current details directly with the
funder.
## Continue from here
- Next in this pack: `../commercialisation-journey-roadmap/SKILL.md` —
Structure the entire commercialisation journey into five stages and build
an actionable roadmap that ties stage gates to agile iteration.
- Related skill in another pack:
`../../../../business-case-and-analysis/skills/roi-npv-sensitivity-model/SKILL.md`
- Pack's shared guardrails: `../../CLAUDE.md`
- Overview of the full journey: `../commercialisation-journey-roadmap/SKILL.md`
## References
- `../../references/case-studies.md` — 7 spin-out examples from different
industries and regions
- `../../references/terminology.md` — the handbook's glossary
- `../../references/sources.md` — the handbook's own source references
- `../../CLAUDE.md` — the pack's shared guardrails
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!