End-to-end recruiting pipeline — JD authoring, resume screening, interview design with scorecard, and calibration / final decision — bilingual (Chinese-English) outputs throughout.
Scanned 9/19/2026
Install to Claude Code
npx -y skills add peter-tu-zynkr/zynkr-skill-builder --skill zynkr-recruiter --agent claude-codeInstalls into .claude/skills of the current project.
Are you the author of Zynkr Recruiter?
Add the live security badge to your README — it updates automatically with every re-scan.
[](https://www.skillsdirectory.com/skills/peter-tu-zynkr-zynkr-recruiter)More formats (shields.io, HTML) on the badges page.
---
name: zynkr-recruiter
sheetId: "7.07"
description: "End-to-end recruiting pipeline — JD authoring, resume screening, interview design with scorecard, and calibration / final decision — bilingual (Chinese-English) outputs throughout."
category: people-talent
project: zynkr-recruiter
platform: claude
status: Done
author: Jane Liao
input: "A hiring need from a hiring manager — anywhere from rough notes to a full JD + resume stack"
process: "Stage 1 JD architecture → Stage 2 resume screening with hybrid weighted scoring → Stage 3 competency-based interview design + scorecard → Stage 4 calibration & final decision recording"
output: "JD draft (YAML), candidate fit scores with HR Decision Summary, bilingual interview kit + scorecard, and a final decision sheet with bilingual candidate communication templates"
synergy: []
type: agent
skills: ["recruiter-jd-architect", "recruiter-resume-screener", "recruiter-interview-question", "recruiter-calibrator"]
house-style: bound
---
# Recruiting Pipeline
```bash
npx skills add https://github.com/peter-tu-zynkr/zynkr-skill-builder --skill zynkr-recruiter
```
Run the full hiring loop — from rough role notes to a calibrated hire/no-hire decision — through four specialized agents. Use this skill at any entry point in the loop; the orchestrator will route to the right agent and pass artifacts forward.
---
## Step 1 — Identify entry point
Ask the user:
```
Where are you in the hiring process?
1. Starting from scratch — only have rough role notes
2. Have a JD — ready to screen candidates
3. Have shortlisted candidates — ready to design interviews
4. Interviews done — ready to calibrate and decide
```
Use the answer to determine the starting stage. Skip earlier stages if their artifacts are already provided.
---
## Step 2 — Stage 1: JD Architecture (subagent)
Display:
```
---------------------------------------------
Stage 1: JD Architecture (The RoleCrafter)
---------------------------------------------
```
Launch the `recruiter-jd-architect` agent (`./agents/recruiter-jd-architect.md`) using the Agent tool.
The agent will collect: role context → daily tasks → success metrics → requirements → reporting line → career level → work mode → optional salary → optional stakeholder alignment.
Output a structured JD in YAML with version label. Store as `JD_BLUEPRINT`.
---
## Step 3 — Stage 2: Resume Screening (subagent)
Display:
```
---------------------------------------------
Stage 2: Resume Screening (Hybrid Weighted Scoring)
---------------------------------------------
```
Ask the user to provide candidate resumes (text or file). Optionally collect 2–3 sentences about company culture and a target shortlist size.
Launch the `recruiter-resume-screener` agent (`./agents/recruiter-resume-screener.md`), passing `JD_BLUEPRINT` and the resumes.
The agent runs three layers of evaluation:
1. **Hard Skill Gate** — caps Relevance if must-have skills missing
2. **Domain Fit Check** — caps Relevance for cross-function mismatches
3. **Hybrid Weighted Scoring** — Relevance / Value / Behavior / Career / Brand with adaptive weights
Threshold = 60. Output: ranked candidates with HR Decision Summary per candidate. Store as `CANDIDATE_PROFILES`.
---
## Step 4 — Stage 3: Interview Question Design + Scorecard (subagent)
Display:
```
---------------------------------------------
Stage 3: Interview Design (Competency + Scorecard)
---------------------------------------------
```
For each shortlisted candidate, launch the `recruiter-interview-question` agent (`./agents/recruiter-interview-question.md`), passing `JD_BLUEPRINT` and the candidate's `Candidate Strength Profile` from Stage 2.
The agent produces:
1. Competency model (5–7 items)
2. Interview round assignment
3. Competency-based question bank (behavioral / situational / technical / culture) with probes and 1–5 anchors
4. Candidate-specific risk questions (6-dimension risk model)
5. Weighted scoring rubric with behavioral anchors
6. Bilingual scorecard ready for HR
Store as `INTERVIEW_KIT_<candidate>`.
**Important:** This agent does NOT score candidates. Scoring happens after interviews, in Stage 4.
---
## Step 5 — Stage 4: Calibration & Decision (subagent)
Display:
```
---------------------------------------------
Stage 4: Calibration & Final Decision
---------------------------------------------
```
After interviews complete, ask the user to provide:
- Interview transcripts (if available)
- Each interviewer's independent scores and notes
- Whether AI should extract evidence only, or also draft calibration summaries
Launch the `recruiter-calibrator` agent (`./agents/recruiter-calibrator.md`), passing `JD_BLUEPRINT`, `INTERVIEW_KIT_<candidate>`, and the interview artifacts.
The agent produces:
1. Behavioral evidence per competency (extracted from transcripts)
2. Pre-calibration review (score discrepancies, contradictions)
3. Calibration meeting discussion guide
4. Final decision sheet (Hire / No Hire / Hold with rationale, risks, mitigations)
5. Bilingual communication templates (internal to recruiter + external to candidate)
Store as `FINAL_DECISION_<candidate>`.
---
## Step 6 — Hand-off and follow-up
Compile per-candidate deliverables:
- JD Blueprint (Stage 1)
- Resume Screening summary (Stage 2)
- Interview kit + scorecard (Stage 3)
- Final decision sheet (Stage 4)
Ask:
```
Next steps:
1. Send candidate communications (internal + external templates)
2. Move shortlisted candidates to onboarding handoff
3. Iterate on a specific stage (e.g., refresh JD, add candidates, redo calibration)
```
---
## Rules
- All deliverables must be bilingual (Chinese-English, side by side)
- Never invent candidate evidence not in the transcript
- Never modify the original scorecard during calibration
- Stage 3 designs questions only; Stage 4 evaluates — keep them separate
- Threshold for shortlist is 60; below threshold, suggest contract or alternative roles instead of forcing hire
## House style
Writing style is **not owned by this file**. The house voice lives in two Google Docs under
`[@] 寫作指南` (`12DBdFz3SK22ie9im_ThFMI7IBRXsTZsV`), read at runtime:
- 《[2.0] Zynkr 通用風格指南 House Voice》 `10bOIQwRm9Pxwgct4hlwCwK_B4Pipai1HqBPZKzyRHSE` —
the universal core, plus the addendum for this surface
- 《[3.2] 禁用詞清單 Forbidden Words》 `1N5sHLP4qzmmhpCGsi6KElxi1z0MFe4QZ0Q_35T10Uyg`
Read both before producing client- or reader-facing text, and scan the draft against 《[3.2]》
before handing it over. If Drive is unreachable, say so in the output rather than proceeding
unchecked. Never re-implement either list inside this file.
Is this your skill, or is something wrong with this listing? Request removal or report an issue. Author removals are honored within 72 hours.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!